Sentences with phrase «political editor reviewed»

The BBC's political editor reviewed PMQs» dominated by references to union boss Len McCluskey and Unite's role in picking Labour candidates bidding to become MPs.

The BBC's political editor reviewed PMQs» dominated by references to union boss Len McCluskey and Unite's role in picking Labour candidates bidding to become MPs.

Not exact matches

Pushing back against «political correctness,» in 1987, Thiel co-founded the Stanford Review, a journal of conservative and libertarian viewpoints, and was its first editor - in - chief.

While at Temple, she was a member of the Temple National Trial team and an editor for the Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review.

Indeed, one of his biographers reports that in the 1950s he even made an attempt to purchase the Catholic magazine Commonweal (through the agency of a National Review contributor, the political theorist James Burnham, whose brother Philip had been Commonweal's editor).

No violations of normal procedure occurred; Sherkat says he «may well have made the same decisions» Wright did, given the reviews; and he dismisses as «ludicrous» any suggestion that the editor was up to anything political.

Mohammad I. Aslam is a Ph.D candidate in Political Science at the Department of Middle - East & Mediterranean Studies, King's College London, and a former Editor at the Montreal Review Journal.

The clashes over energy policies at PMQs were reviewed by BBC deputy political editor James Landale with Conservative MP Alan Duncan, Labour MP Vernon Coaker and Daily Politics presenter Andrew Neil.

Tim Farron told ITV News» Deputy Political Editor Chris Ship said that the party would review the consequences of the policy, adding that leader Nick Clegg shared «the view that this is something that we want to see changed».

The Sun's political editor Tom Newton Dunn was also a guest on the Andrew Marr Show, where he was reviewing the newspapers.

The clashes over women on the Conservative front bench which dominated PMQs are reviewed by the BBC's political editor and the Daily Politics panel.

The impact of the final PMQs before Parliament prorogues and the Queen's Speech are reviewed by the BBC's political editor and MPs.

The clashes over the number of women on the Conservative front bench which dominated PMQs were reviewed by the BBC's political editor and the Daily Politics panel.

The exchanges at PMQs between David Cameron and Harriet Harman are reviewed by the BBC political editor and MPs on the Daily Politics.

Postscript: After I first reviewed this film when it was released in theaters, I received several letters to the editor from folks with a political agenda defending the gangstas in the film, suggesting that they were freedom fighters taking on American imperialism.

And though Hacker and Dreifus, a former Queens College political science professor (and frequent contributor to the New York Review of Books) and a veteran science reporter and editor, respectively, turn in what appears to be a useful essay about the challenges ahead for the CCSS, Peter Cunningham, a former assistant secretary of education, says that Hacker and Dreifus themselves «contribute greatly to the confusion and misinformation surrounding the issue of learning standards.»

All Acting Vs. Writing Advertising Apps For Writers Art Author Collectives Banning Books Blogging Blog Tours Book Cover Design Book Marketing Booksellers Branding Character Development Character - Driven Fiction Christian Erotica Clichés In Writing Co-Authoring Construction Coping With Anxiety Coping With Rejection Letters Copyright Copyright Infringement Copywriting Creating A Business Plan Dealing With Fear Defining Success Depression Developing Setting Drug & / or Alcohol Abuse Editing Vs. Writing Editors Education Entrepreneurial Skills Ethical Issues In Fiction Evoking Emotion Expat Writers Fame Fantasy Finding Inspiration Finding Your Voice Follow Your Dreams For Aspiring Writers For Indie Authors Gender Issues Genre Getting Published Ghostwriting Grief Handling Critique Historical Fiction Horror Stories In Publishing Interdisciplinary Art Karma Lit Killing Off Characters Learning From Mistakes LGBT LGBT Literature Literary Adaptations Literary Journals Lyrics Mailing Lists Marketing Memoir Metaphysical Lit Multicultural Fiction Music Music Vs. Writing Nonfiction Nonfiction To Fiction Nurturing Creativity Packaging Advice Perfectionism Photography Playwriting Plotting Poetry Political Art Pornography Protagonist Development Public Speaking Publishing Religion Research Romance Novels Self - doubt Selfpublishing Setting Goals Social Effects Of Fiction Social Media Social Networking Spiritual Lit Staying Motivated Stereotypes Success Taking Care Of Yourself Taking Risks Target Audience Thrillers Time Management Time Travel Traditional Publishing Trilogy Trust Your Instincts Truth In Fiction Twitter For Writers Typesetting Websites Work / Life Balance Writer Quirks Writer's Block Writers» Conference Writer's Life Writing Advice Writing A Series Writing As Therapy Writing Book Reviews Writing Craft Writing Dialects Writing Erotica Writing For A Living Writing For Children Writing (General) Writing Groups Writing In A Foreign Language Writing Playlists Writing Sequels Writing Vs. Medicine Writing Workshops Writing Yourself Into Your Characters Youth Arts Youth Education

Any author — or publisher, or editor — who gets widely associated with a political viewpoint that generates a lot of passion will inevitably suffer a loss of attractiveness when it comes to getting nominated for awards — or just reader reviews.

Our esteemed panel included Kyle Pope, Editor - in - Chief of Columbia Journalism Review, Naomi Wolf, Author, Political Activist, and Co-Founder of Daily Clout, Walter Mosley, Novelist and Social Commentator, Jeff Jarvis, Director of the Tow - Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism, Ali Gharib, Chief Politics Editor at Mic News, and Sheryl Huggins Salomon, Senior Editor - At - Large at The Root.

Columns and reviews Associate editor Pablo Larios writes a fan letter in praise of the late Guy Davenport; Olivia Laing discussed the enduring relevance of Philip Guston's «Klan» paintings amidst recent racial tensions in the US; Krzysztof Kościuczuk observes how «necropolo,» a new genre of macabre, deadpan music in Poland, reflects current political anxieties; Ben Eastham witnesses a revival of state - of - the - nation novels in his review of Virginie Despentes's book trilogy, «Vernon Subutex»; Andrew Mellor surveys the London Sinfonietta, past and present, as it celebrates its 50th anniversary; and Elvia Wilk asks whether live - action role play can help us overcome social obstacles in the art world.

In addition to contributions by the directors of the Museum Ludwig and ARoS — Yilmaz Dziewior and Erlend G. Høyersten — the authors include Tom Holert, distinguished German art historian, taking an in - depth look at Rosenquist's unique spatiality; Stephan Diederich, curator and specialist at Museum Ludwig, giving a review of the themes in the exhibition; Sarah Bancroft, art historian, curator, and Rosenquist expert who co-curated the 2003 Guggenheim Museum Rosenquist retrospective (and current head of the Rosenquist Foundation and the studio) illuminates Rosenquist's seminal source collages; Tino Grass, German designer and researcher, revealing new perspectives on Rosenquist's historic work F - 111; Isabel Gebhardt, Museum Ludwig conservator, outlining the intensive research efforts and conservation work recently undertaken on Horse Blinders; and Tim Griffin, former editor - in - chief of the esteemed American art journal Artforum, discussing the political potential of Pop art as exemplified by a work James Rosenquist created for one of the magazine's issues.

The evidence for this is in precisely what happens in venues like E&E that have effectively dispensed with substantive peer review for any papers that follow the editor's political line — you end up with a backwater of poorly presented and incoherent contributions that make no impact on the mainstream scientific literature or conversation.

And to further assert that peer review is abandoned precisely in order to let the editor publish papers which support her political position, is even more damaging, not to mention being completely ridiculous.

Yesterday the «the Observer's award - winning Chief Political Commentator» was conspicuously absent from the paper, instead he was replaced by Joanna Biggs, the assistant editor at the London Review of Books.