Not exact matches
Amid the flurry of claims and counter-claims over an old power plant, The Australian Financial Review weighs up the arguments, leaving
aside the
political point - scoring.
«While some of our members have differed in the past on some of the specific issues in the New NY Agenda, the Executive Committee unanimously takes this position because we understand and accept Andrew's
point that this is a pivotal moment in the history of this state, similar to the 1975 New York City fiscal crisis, when leaders in the labor, civic, business and
political arena must put
aside their individual agendas for the good of the entire state.»
As WFP leader Dan Cantor said at the time (fingers crossed, no doubt): «We understand and accept Andrew's
point that this is a pivotal moment in the history of this state, similar to the 1975 New York City fiscal crisis, when leaders in the labor, civic, business and
political arena must put
aside their individual agendas for the good of the entire state.»
Loosely (extremely loosely), the media is hugely left - wing (leaving
aside the
point I agree with that left / right is a highly imprecise and largely meaningful term); and therefore anything the media says about the right - including calling Nazism «right» - is aimed not at some universal truth but at scoring
political points against their opponents.
Single - payer
aside, the more simplified position that the Affordable Care Act has some flaws is likely at the very least a middle
point from which candidates can try to sow consensus among voters of all
political stripes.
This doesn't answer your question, but as an
aside, it's important to understand that your second and third bullet
points are completely incorrect; while it used to be true that Swiss bank accounts often came with «guarantees» of neutrality and privacy, in recent years even the Swiss banks have been caving to
political pressure from many sides (especially US / Obama), with regards to the most extreme cases of criminals.
Putting the
political aspect
aside, I would really like to hear the opinions of the RC regulars, both real scientists and the scientist wannabes (like me), on what date you would pick on a time line and say, «by this
point we knew about the A in AGW and there was very little doubt, even if we had a lot of uncertainty about the amount of warming and interactions between various parts of the environment, and we should have started to take action to reduce our emissions».