Sentences with phrase «political views of the people»

Not exact matches

He said he would be inviting «leading conservatives» and people from all across the political spectrum to talk with him and share their points of view about the issues raised by the Gizmodo story.

Cook called for unity among Apple workers regardless of their political views, and came out against remarks Trump made during a Tuesday press conference equating far - right hate groups with the people protesting them.

More disappointing for people hoping for a window into what to expect from the Trump administration is a lack of details on Ivanka's own life and political views.

«And people in the corn belt, regardless of political views, are protective of how that would affect prices of grain.»

Currently, it's against the law for companies to punish people for political views in only a handful of jurisdictions, but it should be a bedrock of our republic.

Widely available information from commercial data brokers provided people's names, addresses, shopping habits and more, but failed to distinguish on more fine - grained matters of personality that might affect political views.

Facebook declined to comment beyond a previously released statement that it was «just one of many ways people received their information — and was one of the many ways people connected with their leaders, engaged in the political process and shared their views.»

Unlike the previous government, the NDP has intentionally sought to bring together a group of people with diverse and differing political views and expertise to advise on the implementation of Alberta's Climate Change plans.

Hawthorne's view of providence undergirded the political idea that slavery would right itself in due time if people had the patience to wait for it.

Best of all, she suggests that people of faith do themselves and others a disservice when they use the bible selectively to bolster their arguments for specific political views and lifestyle prescriptions, using it «as a blunt weapon», as she puts it.

All these things affect people's political point of view.

One of the glories of science is that people come together to do it who have all sorts of religious beliefs, philosophical views, cultural backgrounds, and political opinions.

The Public Order Act, argues Rod Liddle, source of the first story, «is used... to criminalise people who express inconvenient political views».

Although as an analyst she was radical for her times in her feminist views, she lacked the explicit emphasis of radical feminist therapists today on the therapeutic necessity of empowering people in therapy to change the social - political causes of their personal problems.

too true; you're right, we are holistic people in a holistic world living holistic lives and political theory, religion, ethics, behavior, psychology, these and many others are all so inextricably intertwined with each other that it may be better to think of them as different views of the same object rather than distinct objects that are inter-related (using «object» here, of course, metaphorically)

The person in front of me wanted to share her views on a few political issues which were obviously important to her, namely abortion, gun control, taxes and Obamacare.

Many also address problems tangential to ethics: social structures, political organization and control, economic systems, the ethos and the world view of the people, theological interpretations of moral issues and much more.

In their view, books stressing contingency «offer a way forward, beyond the «old political history» and the new «social and cultural history» by a reunion of process and event,» In other words, what Individual people did — perhaps especially people who filled leading public posts — may be as genuinely significant as the ordinary forces acting upon ordinary people.

Solzhenitsyn attempts to rewrite the Russian people's history from the point of view of those banished from it — the political prisoners and victims of the totalitarian state.

Let me give you some examples of people you could try to develop relationships with: atheists, abortion doctors, homosexuals, pornographers, strippers, prostitutes, drug addicts, alcoholics, people who have different theological views than you do, people with different political views, etc..

He rightly cautions against the excessive politicizing of religion, which has reached the point where people choose their church on the basis of their social or political views.

The task Rawls set for himself was to adumbrate a form of liberalism»» political» liberalism» that could reasonably and in good conscience be embraced by people subscribing to a wide range of reasonable and conflicting «comprehensive views,» including decidedly cognitivist and non-relativist and comprehensive views, such as Catholicism.

The aspirations of subject peoples today for political and spiritual freedom should be viewed with understanding and sympathy by those who prize their own liberties, bought by the effort of their fathers.

In practice, the development of a political identity is only partly conditioned by views on specific issues: it's also an expression of what sort of person one wants to be.

A Christian world and life view furnished the basis for this early political thought, which guided the American people for nearly two centuries and whose crowning lay in the writing of the Constitution of 1787.

substantial, in part because of the political ties of many of its preachers, beginning with their support of a number of conservative causes and candidates in l980, but also because they galvanized strong support from a relatively small group of people who for the first time found a national public articulation of their views.

For someone to strap on a back pack full of explosives and kill hundreds if not thousands of people, the reality of that person is so far removed from «your» world - view and we as a whole, are so far apart, that unfortunately more lives will continue to be needlessly lost in relationship to the theo - political climates and it's twisted religions and ideologies.

It is, however, not so different a view from those of people miles apart from her in political ideology.

«Progress» brought us the secular regimes of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot that persecuted «internal enemies» for religious, political, and intellectual views and killed about 98 Million of their own people.

On the other hand, if we view people as persons - in - community, the socio - political structures will aim to constitute themselves as the kind of society that strengthens and enriches community.

He said: «We're going to need to change by virtue a humanised political debate over exactly what we want to see in our country, that means changing the law, it is also changing the culture so people view abortion as what it is, destruction of an unborn child.»

«Over a number of decades we were political opponents and held very different views on many, many issues but the one thing we were absolutely united on was the principle that our people were better able to govern themselves than any British government.

People precede polity in this Lockean view of civic association by contract and government by consent, and the economic realm precedes the political.

I think a lot of people get hung up on the political views of the members (Abortion... gay marriage... etc) but from what i've seen, they largely are just trying to help people in need from all walks of life.

... Since man enjoys the capacity for a free personal choice in truth... the right to religious freedom should be viewed as innate to the fundamental dignity of every human person... all people are «impelled by nature and also bound by our moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth» (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, 2)... let me express my sincere hope that your expertise in the fields of law, political science, sociology and economics will converge in these days to bring about fresh insights on this important question andthus bear much fruit now and into the future.

This political point of view appeared in its most blatant form in Western civilization in a country known to its people as the «Fatherland.»

Intense questioning and exploration are developmentally appropriate when young people are sorting out their commitments to the many dimensions of their lives — their political views, spirituality, intimacy, work, sexuality.

But of course I recognize that many people who don't share my political views might still support the current school food reform efforts, and I agree that I didn't acknowledge that at all in this post.

A person who's a conservative / Republican politically and atheist faith wise, typically self - identifies far more as the former than the latter, and as such would be less inclined to discuss their religious views in the first place in public (even witout concern of their political ambitions).

These people — regardless of whether you agree with their political views — lost homes.

Why should we prohibited non-democratic forms of political organization when we insist that government shouldn't be in thee business of controlling how people voice their views?

«Speaking as someone who has never been accused of political correctness, I believe that our political leaders should use their position to bring understanding about the religion of Islam and clarify that these misguided murderers have perverted people's views on what Islam really is.»

I've got a problem with this sentence: «These people — regardless of whether you agree with their political views — lost homes.»

Of course the political view can have different excesses and asking like «should a extreme conservative justice be balanced by two shlight liberal persons?»

There is still, of course the question of whether we can stand aside and watch humantarian disasters unfold while the people are organising themselves, but maybe we have to take the long view and do some political cost - benefit analysis.

This could, of course, be viewed as an effective means of engaging young people in political discourse.

My interest in this whole issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?

All of the above applies to the SGP Youths as well, but for the Youths I would expect the relatively high number of members to be even more pronounced as young adults raised in a religious family and community where > 20 % of the population vote for the SGP tend to have pretty clear views on their political and religious affiliation at a relatively young age, whereas other people tend to choose their political affiliations at a later age (if they ever choose one).

Humanists UK Chief Executive Andrew Copson commented, «People from across the political spectrum, representing a range of different religions and beliefs, are united on this one point: whatever your views on faith schools themselves, it can not be right for taxpayer - funded schools to divide and discriminate against children.

Unlike Okudzeto Ablakwa who conveys the impression in his articles that constitutionalism, democracy and the rule of law mandate that I should have protected the crimes and graft I exposed simply because of membership of a political party, I take the right and correct view that the constitution enjoins every citizen to uphold and defend it by exposing any activity of any person or group of persons who abuse Article 55 on political parties for criminal purposes.