The U.S. Department of Education is contemplating issuing new rules that could prod states to ensure that
poor and minority children get access to as many high - quality teachers as their more - advantaged peers.
Not exact matches
By shifting funds, public attention
and scarce organizational
and budgetary resources away from schools
and into the coffers of the testing industry vendors, the futures of
poor and minority children and the schools they attend
get compromised.»
Well - intentioned school leaders want to ensure that
poor,
minority children get what they need to improve their reading scores
and have been told that helping such students requires direct
and explicit teaching of literacy skills.
When the group
got its start in the mid-1990s, achievement for
poor and minority children was lagging,
and the education policy community largely ignored their needs.
Last month, the administration scrambled to
get Virginia to scrap its low expectations for
poor and minority children amid outcry from reformers
and civil rights activists over the Old Dominion's move to approve AMO targets that only require districts to ensure that 57 percent of black students (
and 65 percent of Latino peers) are proficient in math by 2016 - 2017; those targets were blessed by the administration back in June as part of its approval of the state's waiver proposal.
No one should be surprised that the U.S. Department of Education's new guidance for 41 states to renew the waivers granted to them under the Obama Administration's effort to eviscerate the No
Child Left Behind Act
and its accountability provisions effectively allows states to
get away with continuing their shortchanging of
poor and minority children.
As I have noted, stronger standards alone aren't the only reason why student achievement has improved within this period; at the same time, the higher expectations for student success fostered by the standards (along with the accountability measures put in place by the No
Child Left Behind Act, the expansion of school choice, reform efforts by districts such as New York City,
and efforts by organizations such as the College Board
and the National Science
and Math Initiative to
get more
poor and minority students to take Advanced Placement
and other college prep courses), has helped more students achieve success.
He also finds it particularly interesting that Common Core foes say they want high - quality education for all
children, yet fail to consider that their opposition to the standards hurts
poor and minority kids as well as middle class white
and Asian
children in suburbia, both of which have few options — including vouchers
and charter schools — to which they can avail in order to
get high - quality education.
As Dropout Nation has noted ad nauseam, few of the accountability systems allowed to replace No
Child's Adequate Yearly Progress provision are worthy of the name; far too many of them, including the A-to-F grading systems put into place by such states as New Mexico (as well as subterfuges that group all
poor and minority students into one super-subgroup) do little to provide data families, policymakers, teachers,
and school leaders need to help all students
get high - quality education.
While we appreciate any support we can
get to fix a broken state funding system that penalizes
poor and minority children in Chicago
and around the state, we hope that Randi's support lasts beyond a 24 - hour news cycle.»
If we become a country that rejects facts
and analyses that do not support our political positions, sees research independently conducted
and reviewed as dangerous, treats public education as only one —
and one of the least desirable — ways to educate our
children, makes it even harder than it is now for
poor and minority children to
get a college education, then, in my view, our days are numbered.
By standing pat, Virginia has all but assured that its
children, especially those from
poor and minority backgrounds, will continue
getting an education unfit for their futures.
Instead of providing all kids with college - oriented learning (as Eliot supported), these educators pushed what would become the comprehensive high school model, with middle - class white kids (along with those few
children of émigrés deemed worthy of such curricula)
getting what was then considered high - quality learning, while
poor and minority kids were relegated to shop classes
and less - challenging coursework.
When
poor children are more likely to
get sick
and die than
children in wealthier neighborhoods just across town; when rural families are more likely to go without clean water; when ethnic
and religious
minorities, or people with disabilities, or people of different sexual orientations are discriminated against or can't access education
and opportunity — that holds all of us back.