But one thing on which they agree is that there is little that schools can do to improve educational achievement, particularly
for poor and minority students.
It has increased the focus on the education
of poor and minority students, but it has not provided schools with needed tools to create higher quality schooling for these students.
This finding suggests that in addition to expanding the overall level of support for all students, the state must expand its investment in programs that
serve poor and minority students.
Families for Excellent Schools is urging officials to double down on funding of charter schools in order to close the achievement gap
among poor and minority students.
Its pressure to raise test scores has caused many schools to
give poor and minority students an impoverished education that focuses primarily on basic skills.
But these results at least indicate that accountability systems can help to focus attention on
poor and minority students whose needs have been ignored or neglected.
What is the distribution of educational resources across schools and what effect do disparities in resources have on the achievement
of poor and minority students?
Under the waiver initiative, many states have dropped those thresholds down to 20 or 30 students, meaning
more poor and minority students «count» toward a school's rating.
They argue that annual testing is critical for tracking how effectively schools are
educating poor and minority students and that evaluations based only on subjective criteria like observations typically fail to identify weak teachers.
The data, part of the benchmark test known as the National Assessment of Educational Progress, show that New York City fourth graders have made progress in closing the gap between their scores and the state and national results in reading, despite the higher percentages of
poor and minority students in the city.
It spelled defeat for Students Matter, a small nonprofit organization that sponsored the lawsuit and argued that the laws
harmed poor and minority students who were disproportionately saddled with 1 to 3 percent of the state's worst - performing teachers.
Scott, Murray and the White House all wanted to preserve testing students each year, break out data on test results to show achievement gaps and use that information to determine when a school needs to change — as a clear way to ensure
poor and minority students don't fall through the cracks in the system.
So if a district has two high schools — one serving mostly affluent white students and another serving
mostly poor and minority students — those schools had better offer a similar number of AP courses, lest the OCR come knocking on their doors.
In one of the nation's largest school districts, Clark County, Nevada, which includes Las Vegas, far too many students — especially
particularly poor and minority students — lack access to a high - quality school.
Moskowitz, who has pledged to build out the Success network to 100 schools, is likely to continue on the warpath against de Blasio, accusing him of
depriving poor and minority students of educational opportunities, as she will do at a march over the Brooklyn Bridge in a few weeks.
In fact, in 2015,
poor and minority student groups in charter schools outperformed their peers attending traditional public schools in reading, writing, and math.
Regardless of the quality and tenure of the principal, low - achieving schools and schools with high proportions of
poor and minority students face increased barriers to attracting, hiring, and retaining quality leaders.
From where EdTrust sits, the uproar over the Florida plan (and similar plans like it) also ignores its contention that Cut the Gap in Half actually forces states, districts, and schools to work harder because they must improve achievement for
poor and minority students at annual clips greater than the average rate.
A tweak in the enforcement of the No Child Left Behind Act leaves some education advocates claiming the Obama administration is pulling back on a civil rights promise to make
sure poor and minority students get qualified teachers.
Since the late 1980s, the plaintiffs in these cases have won nearly 70 percent of the time — a reflection of the continuing inequality of education for
poor and minority students half a century after Brown v. Board of Education.
When high - achieving or high -
potential poor and minority students have less access to gifted education than their peers, the existence of such programs may actually worsen inequalities, thus widening what Jonathan Plucker at Johns Hopkins University and the term «excellence gaps» — the differences between subgroups of students performing at the highest levels of achievement.
In 2015, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) submitted an equitable access plan to address differences in access to excellent educators experienced
by poor and minority students.
Restorative justice has replaced zero - tolerance discipline policies in schools around the country following evidence that tough discipline in schools sends
primarily poor and minority students into the hands of the justice system.
The report was part of a U.S. Department of Education study that examined the reasons
poor and minority students fail to get equal access to the best and most qualified teachers ---- the lack of which remains a persistent problem in the state.
Last year, several states proposed teacher cadet programs in federal «educator equity plans» that were submitted to the U.S. Department of Education and attempt to give
poor and minority students better teachers.
Additionally, this is an education system that promotes inequality and therefore injustice: Schools in the United States are twice as likely to
pair poor and minority students with brand - new teachers and almost four times more likely to suspend black students than white students.
Schenectady City Schools Superintendent Laurence Spring has filed a federal complaint that argues the state's aid formula discriminates
against poor and minority students.
In some school communities, like New York City,
many poor and minority students are attending under - resourced schools that are not only separate and isolated, but that are also just as unequal as they were in the mid-20th century.
Gary Natriello and Aaron Pallas, of Columbia's Teachers College, show that under high - stakes testing policies in New York, Texas, and
Minnesota poor and minority students will be less likely to receive a high school diploma.