Begun in 1965, the U.S. Head Start program is still trying to find the best way to prepare
poor children for school.
Not exact matches
Her family was so
poor that, as a
child, Oprah was teased at
school for wearing dresses made of potato sacks.
At the very least, therefore,
schools for poor and minority
children should have as much funding per student, as many qualified teachers and as good physical facilities as other
schools.
In fact, we already do that in a number of areas — Pell grants
for poor college students,
child care to the parent, not a religious institution, and the parent freely chooses a
school that is secular, Buddhist, Baptist and so on.
As I go to court with
poor immigrants, visit their
children in
schools and translate
for them in job interviews, I am always stmck by how much social capital I have by simply being able to speak English well and to work as a professional in the community.
Furthermore one can not invest in stocks and at the same fund a
school for poor children.
Frank Riessman, The Culturally Deprived
Child [New York: Harper, 1962]-RRB- This is why middle - class talk therapies are inadequate and why the
poor may not do well in middle - class - oriented
school systems which emphasize verbal skills, abstract reasoning, and knowledge
for knowledge's sake.
Poor parents who have been enabled to choose any
school for their
children are delighted with the results, according to PAVE's annual report which is available free from Family Service America, 11700 West Lake Park Drive, Milwaukee, WI 53224.
Private
schools, charter
schools, voucher programs and other
school choice options have been championed by reform - minded conservatives such as Jeb Bush
for years now, partly because of their success
for countless
children of color living in
poor communities with even
poorer - performing public
schools.
Waqfs were established to furnish trousseaux
for orphan girls,
for paying the debts of imprisoned or bankrupt businessmen,
for clothing
for the aged, to help pay village and neighborhood taxes, to help the army and the navy, to found trade guilds, to give land
for public markets, to build lighthouses, to help orphans and widows and the destitute, to care
for the needs of
poor school children and to give them picnics, to pay
for the funerals of the
poor, to provide holiday gifts
for poor families, to build seaside cottages
for holidays
for the people, to distribute ice - cold water during the summer, to create public playing fields, to distribute rice to birds, and to give food and water to animals.
The Sunday
School was started to provide Christian nurture and knowledge of the Bible
for poor children who lacked the advantages of middle - class family life.
In the space of time available to him, of course, Mr. Clinton could offer little more than a hasty outline of this proposal, but he did manage to make clear that what he was referring to was some sort of system whereby American high
school (and, as it was to turn out, also college) graduates would exchange some years of service, either as policemen, environmental workers, or offerers of some form of assistance to
poor children, in exchange
for the government's subsequently paying their college tuition» a kind of GI Bill
for non-GIs.
Even the Sunday
School took its rise in a move to provide the elements of education
for the working
children of the
poor on the only day they were free.
With the dollars which we waste
for our egoism we could fund
schools for poor children or hospitals
for the
poor or we could fund mission here and abroad.
In New York City, it is generously estimated that one out of ten
poor children beginning first grade will graduate from high
school prepared
for a real college education --» real» meaning not majoring in «black studies» or some other pseudo-discipline, and not dropping out in the first or second year.
When
poor children grow up in an environment marked by stable, responsive parenting; by
schools that make them feel a sense of belonging and purpose; and by classroom teachers who challenge and support them, they thrive, and their opportunities
for a successful life increase exponentially.
Researchers have found, in fact, that most of the achievement gap between well - off and
poor children opens up before age five;
for most
children, the gap then stays pretty steady from kindergarten through the end of high
school.
So that's two of three meals each day provided by a
school, and if those meals are full of fat and cholesterol and low in vitamins and minerals, these
children are not going to grow and develop properly and, even worse, it's setting them up
for poor eating habits that will follow them around
for the rest of their lives.
For example, if you didn't enjoy
school as a
child, you may trivialize or minimalize your
child's
poor school behavior.
I think it is important to point out that this isn't just an issue
for middle class families who care deeply about their
child's diet and are able to provide abundant healthy food choices but
school menus have great impact on many, many
poor children who, through no fault of their own and often with no agency to change the situation, end up being pawns in the lunch tray wars.
For one, you can watch for signs that your school is not meeting your child's needs, such as your tween having less interest in classwork or poorer grad
For one, you can watch
for signs that your school is not meeting your child's needs, such as your tween having less interest in classwork or poorer grad
for signs that your
school is not meeting your
child's needs, such as your tween having less interest in classwork or
poorer grades.
Fathers will undertake learning activities that they perceive will benefit their
children through: ««a desire to build stronger relationships with their
children ««a belief that helping their
children to learn is important
for their
children's success (even when their own
school experience was
poor) ««a strong desire
for their
children to do better than they did (Fletcher, 1997).
Still, advocates
for the
poor remain alarmed that with the potential
for stepped - up auditing, many
children would be dropped from the
school lunch program even if their families meet the eligibility requirements.
Poor decisions at
school: I've worked with many parents whose kids get into trouble at
school for the way they acted, but instead of letting their
child face the music, they try to bail their kid out.
From the file of Rather Obvious News, this study from the University of Michigan Medical
School: children who consume foods purchased from school vending machines, school stores, snack bars and other sales that compete with the federal school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.&
School:
children who consume foods purchased from
school vending machines, school stores, snack bars and other sales that compete with the federal school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.&
school vending machines,
school stores, snack bars and other sales that compete with the federal school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.&
school stores, snack bars and other sales that compete with the federal
school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.&
school lunch program are «more likely to develop
poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk
for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.»
Alternately, the parent may blame the
child for his
poor school performance and believe the problem is the
child's laziness or lack of effort.
Although this might be true in
poorer schools among
poorer children, this is not the case
for the majority of students.
School meals can help
children develop healthy eating habits — or they can prime them
for a life of
poor health and unnecessary suffering (did you hear about Paula Deen's statistically unsurprising diabetes diagnosis?).
Cooking real food
for school children shouldn't have to be like the Peace Corps, where one takes a vow of poverty because the spiritual benefits of helping the
poor make up
for the lack of financial compensation.
In far too many
school districts, there are students who would qualify
for free meals, except
for the fact that their family never fills out the form, either because they forget, or they don't understand that it is important, or (more often) the
child is too embarrassed to self - identify as
poor in front of his classmates, and so he either doesn't give his parents the form or doesn't turn it in at
school.
Considering the fact that
children with
poor oral health are three times more likely to miss
school due to dental pain, many moms choose to do whatever they can to set their kids up
for success.
But numerous obstacles can prevent
children from eating
school meals: many students arrive at
school too late to eat breakfast in the cafeteria, before the
school day begins.;
children may feel a stigma that
school meals are just
for «
poor kids»;
children may need to pay a co-payment
for breakfast and lunch that their families can not afford.
School meals may be the most effective tool
for combating obesity in
poor children.
We must not forget now trainee journalist George Osborne's threat to wage further austerity on the
poorest if the UK chose to leave the EU — nor our previous governments» ideological adherence to slashing any and all public services, whether the NHS, the fire service and community policing, or even free
school meals
for children.
Groups including the Campaign
for Fiscal Equity, which successfully sued the state
for more education funding, charge that Cuomo is ignoring a 2006 court order that said more money needed to be spent to educate the state's
poorest school children.
One is an education tax credit that would give donors a tax break
for funding scholarships to allow
poor children to attend private
schools, and also
for money given to extra curricular programs at public
schools.
The majority of NYC's public
school students are
poor; an astonishing 75 percent (780,000
children) were already eligible
for free or reduced - price lunch.
Of course, free
school meals
for all infants will be of no help to the
poorest children who already qualify
for free
school meals.
Cutting funds
for schools and other related services will irretrievably harm
children and young people, particularly the
poorest ones.
We both want to give
children from the
poorest backgrounds increased funding, so there are greater incentives
for the best
schools to take them on.
But Kolb says he knows talks are going on about the top two remaining issues, renewing New York City's rent laws and an education tax credit
for donors who give up to a million dollars to fund scholarships
for poor children in private
schools and fund afterschool activities at public
schools.
He said the state has «condemned» 250,000
children — often
poor and of color — to failing
schools, and proposed a model
for turning those
schools around by handing them over to nonprofits or turnaround experts to create «community
schools.»
Muba Yarofulani, 53, parent of public
school children Aziza, 17, and Jelani, 12, agreed, adding that Black's appointment sets a
poor example
for children by telling them that they can be appointed jobs without becoming qualified.
«Cutting the roll out of universal free
school meals, abolishing one - to - one tuition, pulling the plug on funding
for breakfast clubs and other extended services, aborting the
school building programme and siphoning off money to allow the pushy and the privileged to set up
schools will hit the
poorest and most disadvantaged
children hardest.
And I will never accept the idea that it's ok
for children from
poorer backgrounds to do worse at
school than their wealthier classmates.
«
Poor children now, they're not thin, they're overweight» - @EmilyThornberry defends @UKLabour's free
school meals
for all policy on #Marr pic.twitter.com/7BZVUzS 9mS
One in four parents would choose a selective
school for their
child and half believe they provide the best opportunities
for poorer students, a new survey reveals.
«Some
schools will no doubt use the money effectively to improve attainment
for children from
poorer backgrounds.
The Lib Dems had apparently asked
for an extra # 2.5 bn to spend on the
school pupil premium to be spent on
poorer children.
He has been a passionate supporter
for annual increases in the Pupil Deprivation Grant which gives
schools with higher numbers of
children from
poor backgrounds more money to spend.