Sentences with phrase «poor children their right»

Not exact matches

Right before that, he'd been in Colombia, delivering shoes to poor children.

Poor parents, no less than rich, have the constitutional right to educate their children in their religious faith.

The Church has the right and duty to educate children, and has a special concern for the children of the poor — including the spiritually and culturally poor.

These men and women have fought for the abolition of slavery (Wilberforce), established orphanages for abandoned children (Mueller), advanced civil rights for racial minorities (King), fought against HIV / AIDS (Koop), provided human touch, restored dignity, and shelter for the poor (Mother Teresa), created places of belonging and contribution for people with disabilities and special needs (Tada), and fought against the sex trade and human trafficking (Caine).

«Friday prayers bring all people of a society together at one time - rich or poor, man or woman, senior citizen or young child,» said Arsalan Iftikhar, an international human rights lawyer and founder of TheMuslimGuy.com.

Widows, the infirm, people with special needs, the poor and unwanted children all were vulnerable and none had the assurance that their human rights would be honored.

Racism... Child Labor Laws... Protections for the poor... Women's Rights... Labor Laws in general... Religious Persecution... Voting Rights... oh wait, the past sucked and the future can only be better as long as we embrace progressivism and abandon all that Dark Ages crap.

liberation of the captives debt slavery of the poor truth and honesty media manipulate minds Justice free market above justice equal dignity of all marginalization of the poor women's dignity and rights (s) exploitation of women, loves little children neglects children's dues Safeguard family break - up of family genuine freedom of conscience freedom for the market forces land, homes for all world apartheid, homelessness work and fair wages for all unemployment: gross inequality

I guess all those abused children and their family's spent those billions on food so it's like the church was just feeding the poor, right?

Even if we can not know the answer to all of society's ills, even if we can not pretend to know how to solve the problems of crime and drugs and inflation and poverty, we can still proclaim that it is obviously and unquestionably a moral wrong to maintain a penal system based on vengeance instead of rehabilitation; to allow human rights violations to go unchallenged (on either side of the iron curtain); to waste vast quantities of food and resources while others are malnourished and sick and poor; or to allow so many children in our own midst to go through childhood unwanted and unloved and even abused.

This is especially true of the rights of the poor, sick and handicapped, and now indeed of the child in the womb.

By law all children have the right to benefit from certain federal programs, but the voucher system — through which funds can be spent to benefit the school, not just the student — is both unconstitutional and poor public policy.

Needs a repost — I had neighbors right next door that would do ritual beatings of their children, 2,4,6 years old every Sunday, I called the police serveral times over the screams from those poor young children and the cops said they could not do anything about it.

Is this your same logic you use when you help to put an end to Obama Care, yours are looked after soon to heck with the poors children let them die because they were stupid enough to be born to poor people, is this your idea of christian values, well they match the republician and tea parties ideology right down the line worship money loath things that help the common man... Very christian indeed!

He changed the way the world treated women and progressed the rights of women; he changed the way the world treated the poor and impoverished; he changed the way the world treated children... I could go on and on.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

People can exercise poor judgement about their OWN lives — but when you do something to a child, that child has rights as well — it's not just property.

This is simple a very intelligent child can solve this problem.Firstly today our keeper was very poor however i know he will come good.By the way why is Paulista no getting his chance.What i have observed about arsenal since we signed Mertesacker from day one and since he started playing is that Mertesacker hardly gets involved you will usually see him a few times because he does not want to get caught out.e has always been a weak link in the defence even in his greatest performances here.When i see us playing with a high line and he is there i always laugh.It is just a mistake waiting to happen and i can tell u that it will happen again this season.Secondly why is Ramsey Cazorla and Ozil playing in the same line - up in a 4 -5-1 formation.That is just not right though it will win you some matches due to individual brilliance.It wont work at all.Lastly the least i say about Giroud the better i am not judging him on one game.One would imagine if he was not french and like chinese will he be getting these chances under Wenger.To me he will always be an average player and i will stand by my word even if he has good games.

And poor child # 3 did not have a book at all, right?

Even if children are being reared in very poor living conditions, no one has a right to take the children away from their parents unless the situation fits the criteria of abuse or neglect.

With a bad environment and poor parenting, orchid children can end up depressed, drug - addicted, or in jail — but with the right environment and good parenting, they can grow up to be society's most creative, successful, and happy people.

I work with children everyday that regardless of the poor choices their parents make they still have the right to have that «openness» and be able to love them unconditionally.

The children who fared the worst were those who had poor attachments (had fewer feelings of trust) and / or who were taken out of their communities right after the traumatic event, i.e. if they had to evacuate and were separated from their family and community.

However, since this is not the «right» way to parent because it leads to a child being dependent and developing poor eating habits, the mother does not give in to what her natural instinct would be or give in to what her baby is demanding.

While it may start innocently in infancy, permitting the behavior can lead to poor conduct as children grow older and know right from wrong.

While the realities described by Paul Tough in this book are very familiar to me, I hope to some day make even a fraction of the difference Geoffrey Canada has made in the lives of children from poor neighborhoods right here in the USA.

AD children often have a poor conscience, thus make them understand what is right and wrong, and teach them to always follow what is right.

Cahill says he wants to do more to protect children at Charter Schools, who often come from the poorest families in the state, and says he sees it as «the civil rights issue of our time».

THe NY state teachers retirement fund has 108 billion — yea thats right BILLIION dollars in it — they have enslaved the taxpayer — and now they want to deprive the poorest children from having a chance of going to a functional private school — REALLY??? Unbelievable!

Almost one million children from poor backgrounds will lose the right to free school meals if Theresa May pushes through cuts in the Conservative manifesto, an educational think tank has warned.

Without the right trigger, delays are likely, and outcomes for these children are likely to be poorer, they say.

Vast inequities within and between countries mean that the poorest, most disadvantaged women, children, and adolescents often miss out on life - saving health services and experience serious violations of their human rights.

Beth, still working for the pediatric neurologist Samira el - Zind, called the doctor in hysterics, asking to be seen right away: «Something has to be done for this poor child!

This not only very poor taste, but it violates the child's right to privacy.

Diamantopoulos gives off a hard - edged sensibility of leadership, Sasso is an unstoppable and energetic ball of facial tics and exaggerated physicality, and, well, Hayes» hair looks right (Speaking of jokes in poor taste, the suggestion that child Larry might be undergoing chemotherapy is a groaner).

Too often we are getting poor tests which are misused to test things not taught and to punish the children attending inferior schools, violating basic concepts of fairness and civil rights.»

Joseph, the associate pastor, said that he, too, is sensitive to public education's objections to vouchers, but he believes that poor families deserve the right to choose where their children attend school.

Though Jacob's school had won a national award for its work with poor and minority children and the principal was kind to Veronica and Jacob, Veronica had a nagging feeling that something was not right.

There are also more age - specific signs.Pre - school children may show: Persistent difficulty in learning nursery rhymes or the name for things, like «table» or «chair»; difficulty with clapping a simple rhythm; enjoyment of being read to but no interest in words or letters; delayed speech development; primary school children may show a poor sense of direction and confusion between left and right; pronounced reading difficulties, specifically hesitant or laboured reading, omitted lines or repetition of the same line or loss of place in the text and difficulties in saying multi-syllabic words.

Beginning with the Serrano court case in California, advocates for changing the way public schools were financed argued that reliance on local property taxes denied children living in property - poor communities the right to a good education.

Two - year technical degrees, and even one - year credentials, can also propel poor children into the middle class, especially if they choose the right field.

In my interactive literature experiment from last school year, the children saw right through poor literature and even the interactive piece was not able to catch them.

In Zelman, the Court is being asked to weigh two competing political values: strict church - state separation on the one hand and the right of poor families to choose the education their children receive on the other.

Civil - rights advocates were initially skeptical, but many saw the potential power of a reform movement that would not brook separate and lower expectations for poor children, immigrants, or racial minorities.

Primary school children may show a poor sense of direction and confusion between left and right.

It's important to remember that this doesn't mean teachers should ignore poor behaviour, but rather, they should focus on those children doing the right thing, before they deal with the trickier students.

If courts can strike down teacher tenure laws as a violation of the rights of poor and minority children (see «Script Doctors,» legal beat, Fall 2014), why not use the results from CCSS assessments to go after the drawing of school boundaries in a way that perpetuates economic school segregation and denies children equal opportunity?

In fact, the modern accountability movement, right through to the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, owes much to Shanker's relentless calls for higher standards, assessments, and consequences for poor performance.

Such results might influence the thinking of an objective observer primarily interested in doing right by the nation's poor children.

Right now, poor ICT results aren't prompting children to take up further computing education and we are in danger of seeing the skills gap increase in the coming years.