Sentences with phrase «poor countries»

The phrase "poor countries" refers to nations that have lower levels of wealth, limited resources, and lower standards of living compared to developed or wealthier nations. These countries often face challenges such as poverty, unemployment, inadequate healthcare, and insufficient access to education. Full definition
Children are born in poor countries with a burden of debt round their necks, perhaps to be paid during their whole life time.
The liberation viewpoint stressed pulling control over the natural resources of poor countries out from under Western power so that the developmental process could continue under autonomous, socialist political systems.
The mechanism would open the door to possible compensation from affluent countries for poor countries facing the mounting costs of extreme climate events.
I would be fine with helping poor countries install renewable energy that won't crash the climate they depend on for survival!
When this happens in poor countries with no safety net, the effects are disastrous; entire communities are sometimes transformed into climate refugees.
But what has become clear has been the need from poorer countries for much stronger signals that the funding they have been promised to implement their emissions reductions plans will be delivered.
It's widely accepted that climate change will have bigger negative impacts on poorer countries than wealthy ones.
It's important I don't lose perspective after growing up in many poor countries as a kid.
Discussion of the $ 100 billion that developed countries have agreed to provide to poor countries by 2020 to cope with warming will not occur until the second week of the conference.
The private sector is weak in many poor countries.
We can think of those authors living in poor countries where it would be impossible to get published and paid.
At some point, you need to stop what you're doing and become an entrepreneur, much like the entrepreneurs in poorer countries who have no other option.
The citizens of very poor countries are at the elephant's back end.
It can be cured with medicine, however many people in poorer countries do not get access to this medicine in time before the disease does permanent damage.
Under a separate deal, nations agreed to raise $ 100 billion per year from public and private sources to help poorer countries adapt and adjust to a hotter planet.
This is a growing problem for rich and poor countries alike.
This pack looks at how rich countries are contributing the most to climate change while poor countries suffer its worst affects.
But the path forward is rife with disputes between rich and poor countries over funding, and how to allocate and enforce emissions reductions.
Even poor countries today have a far greater rate of secondary - school enrollment than did the rich countries of the past.
The money raised needs to go to help poorer countries develop their RE systems.
Should they pay poorer countries to help cut emissions?
Q. On finance, money for assisting poorer countries is articulated to be a down payment, essentially.
Any analysis needs to consider middle - income and poor countries whose energy demands are increasing as people move out of poverty leading to increased CO2 emissions.
It suggests that climate change is not something that will affect only poor countries, or hit rich ones only in the distant future.
Today, we are all specialists, aside from some who live in desperately poor countries.
Economic sanctions on already poor countries may cause as much death and pain as abortion on demand.
And what about the rich people within poor countries?
Furthermore, reduced emissions as a result of fewer people being born in richer countries allows more economic development in poorer countries without adding to total emissions.
And let's be clear, it is not just poorer countries that need to take action.
Coal is still abundant, has helped today's industrial powers become rich, and is helping poorer countries grow their economies.
Deep divisions between rich and poor countries remain over aid for adopting more climate - friendly energy technologies in developing countries, for instance.
But the pattern of poor countries saving a lot and rich countries borrowing was not sustainable.
It is neither helpful nor ethical to expect poor countries to cut their development, though we can expect them to drastically curb their population growth.
These funds are meant to support poorest countries to adapt to the inevitable climate change impacts.
What their analysis shows is that deaths tend to be higher in poor countries exposed to severe natural disasters because of existing socioeconomic, environmental, and structural vulnerabilities.
Girls in poor countries continue to face particularly steep barriers to education.
The rest is loans, which means poor countries must repay with interest the costs of adapting to a problem they have not caused.
Imagine that people in an otherwise poor country have a very valuable natural resource such as oil.
Let poor countries directly go low - carbon economy, is only way to save the world escaping from global warming.
In poorer countries appropriate carbon - price levels may actually be lower than the ranges the report suggests.
Often emerging nations or poorer countries purchase cheaper devices that most likely will not receive an update of any sort, other than manufacturer security and feature updates.
Poor countries might receive transfers for early participation.
This is because countries must compete with one another for capital investment, and poor countries compete primarily by offering low wages and few restrictions.

Phrases with «poor countries»

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z