So there's a mix of «scam» and just «
poor education expectations» and «overpriced education» that happens in any investment area.
Not exact matches
We have lowered
expectations, and have done a
poor job of connecting
education in the classical disciplines with practical theological reflection focused on nurturing excellence in congregational life.
No Child Left Behind, which had strong bipartisan backing when it passed in 2001, was the signature
education initiative of George W. Bush, who said the failure of public schools to teach
poor students and minorities reflected the «soft bigotry of low
expectations.»
In the process, Obama and Duncan are retreating from the very commitment of federal
education policy, articulated through No Child, to set clear goals for improving student achievement in reading and mathematics, to declare to urban, suburban, and rural districts that they could no longer continue to commit educational malpractice against
poor and minority children, and to end policies that damn children to low
expectations.
But the fact that the administration has blessed moves by states such as Tennessee, Florida, and Virginia have enacted race - and class - based socioeconomic targets (including the so - called Cut the Gap in Half approach structured by the
Education Trust) that define proficiency down as well as damn
poor and minority kids to low
expectations also proves lie to Duncan's statement.
It also made it clear to suburban districts that they could no longer continue to commit educational malpractice against
poor and minority children, as well as focused American public
education on achieving measurable results instead of damning kids to low
expectations.
Let the
poor eat tests: In defending his testing proposals, Bush has maintained that low
expectations are racist — but test driven
education embodies low
expectations.
This isn't to say that these officials don't care about these children, but that they are disinterested in taking on the tough work needed to overhaul districts and schools in order provide kids with the schools they deserve — which includes challenging the soft bigotry of low
expectations for
poor and minority kids held by far too many adults working in American public
education in Virginia and the rest of the nation, and the affiliates of the National Education Association which has succeeded for so long in keeping the Old Dominion's status quo qu
education in Virginia and the rest of the nation, and the affiliates of the National
Education Association which has succeeded for so long in keeping the Old Dominion's status quo qu
Education Association which has succeeded for so long in keeping the Old Dominion's status quo quite ante.
MOOCs: A path to early college New programs use data to steer
poor kids into college High school grads aren't even ready for low community college
expectations, report says Conventional college route shifts to «
education buffet»
Related: Low academic
expectations and
poor support for special
education students are «hurting their future»
[Update: Katie Haycock of the
Education Trust (which has gotten into trouble for its role in helping the administration define proficiency down as well as developing the Plessy v. Ferguson - like Cut the Gap in Half approach that is subjecting
poor and minority kids to the soft bigotry of low
expectations), is now going to say that she doesn't like the direction of of the administration's gambit; EdTrust has also released a report criticizing the effort thus far.]
But time — along with the fact that half of all fourth - graders on free - and reduced - cost lunch in suburban schools are functionally illiterate — has proven that integration on its own doesn't deal with the systemic problems of low - quality teaching, shoddy curricula, lackluster leadership, and cultures of low
expectations (especially for
poor and minority kids) that plagues American public
education even when those kids are put into suburban middle - class schools.
In addition to the fact that untrained teachers were hired and teachers were assigned out of field, college admissions standards were lowered for teacher
education programs: Teachers, on average, had
poorer academic records and test scores than other college graduates, and many teacher
education programs lowered their
expectations to accommodate their clientele.
This rationing of
education and soft bigotry of low
expectations for
poor and minority kids would eventually trickle down into the rest of American public
education in the form of ability - tracking and even special
education.
Yet far too many children, especially those from
poor and minority families, are placed at risk by school practices that are based on a sorting paradigm in which some students receive high -
expectations instruction while the rest are relegated to lower quality
education and lower quality futures.