It is no surprise, then, that we are getting
poor educational results.
I glimpsed a quote from Kati Haycock yesterday, kicking off the Education Trust annual conference, saying that we can't let «bad parenting» be an excuse for
poor educational results.
I glimpsed a quote from Kati Haycock, kicking off the Education Trust annual conference, saying that we can't let «bad parenting» be an excuse for
poor educational results.
Not exact matches
The
results bear on the question of how early - childhood
educational interventions can help
poor children access the same
educational concepts that more privileged children have before entering primary school.
Australia achieves relatively strong education
results at an aggregate level, yet many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students experience
poor educational outcomes.
It's no secret that the American
educational system today lists under the weight of some massive, seemingly intractable burdens such as
poor college preparation, modest achievement
results compared with other nations, high dropout rates, significant teaching and performance disparities across racial and socioeconomic backgrounds, and a deficit of graduates equipped with the necessary skills for tomorrow's workforce.
It also made it clear to suburban districts that they could no longer continue to commit
educational malpractice against
poor and minority children, as well as focused American public education on achieving measurable
results instead of damning kids to low expectations.
Because as a
result of the local authority's failure to deal with
educational underperformance, children continue to go to a
poor school.»
«We know on the back of
poor Pisa
results previously that we've embarked on this programme of
educational reform.
Clearly, the
result would be
poor educational decisions that slow or otherwise harm student learning, individually or collectively.
As a condition of basic funding, they demand concrete
results, like standardized test scores, that are often irrelevant to important
educational and life outcomes; and that often force schools to deprive
poor children of the types of learning that are most important in life.
It may be contentious to state that many American children, whether they come from
poor, middle - income, or wealthy families, do not have adequate access to high - quality
educational opportunities and, as a
result, fall short of achieving their academic potential while in school.
Some believe the choice system will
result in
educational equity for all and some believe it will re-stratify the education system, further separating the rich from the
poor.
Mothers most commonly reported that their children were in the care of relatives (65 %) with 11 % reporting that their child was in the child protection system.15 Disruption to a child's living arrangements, including separation from parents and siblings, can
result in psychological and emotional distress.16 17 A recent systematic review and meta - analysis of 40 studies that investigated child outcomes when either parent was incarcerated found a significant association with antisocial behaviour (pooled OR = 1.6, 95 % CI 1.4 to 1.9) and
poor educational performance (pooled OR = 1.4, 95 % CI 1.1 to 1.8).18 Other research indicates that children of incarcerated mothers are at risk of increased criminal involvement, mental health issues, physical health problems, behavioural problems, 19 child protection contact20 and
poorer educational outcomes.21
Long - term tobacco use following pregnancy also
results in
poorer maternal health, which an extensive body of research shows is intricately linked with economic trends,
educational opportunities, and productivity.56 Women's lower wages, unemployment, and lost productivity
resulting from these risk factors add up to high costs that home visiting can help alleviate.57 With 42 percent of mothers in the United States being breadwinners, home visiting programs are critically important to support not only their health but also their and their families» economic well - being.58
Other
results show that children who live absent their biological fathers are more likely to be
poor, to use drugs, to experience
educational, health, emotional and behavioral problems, to be victims of child abuse, and to engage in criminal behavior than their peers who live with their married, biological (or adoptive) parents.
Many Indigenous peoples enter poverty and homelessness as a
result of
poor educational and employment opportunities