Available: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/04/26095519/12 Barnes, M., Connolly, A. and Tomaszewski, W (2008) The circumstances of persistently
poor families with children: Evidence from the Families and Children Study (FACS).
More than half of
poor families with children have a video game system, such as an Xbox or PlayStation.
The marital situation of the low - income family is now terrifying — 71 per cent of
poor families with children are not married.
Worse, it hurts
poor families with children the most, while the now relatively few dairy farmers are, on average, millionaires.
Before Obamacare, Medicaid programs were primarily geared towards working
poor families with children, leaving many poor childless adults without an affordable public health plan.
This IFS research puts the Budget's regressive impact beyond doubt: the poorest will be hit more than many of the richest in cash terms let alone as a percentage; poor and middle income families with children lose out more than any other household types and the very
poorest families with children lose more than any other groups — with 5 per cent of their total income being cut.
Child Health plus greatly expanded coverage for
poorer families with children under 19 who did not qualify for Medicaid.
It has big social implications, too: that a child with an instrument and a teacher is no longer poor or excluded; that
a poor family with a child in an orchestra has a path to the future.
Not exact matches
As a
child, I often filled in these blanks
with my very active imagination, and my
poor mother would have to refute yet another wild story of mine about how I'd come to live
with my
family.
Before Obamacare, Medicaid was largely a program that helped
poor, working
families with children.
Her backstory of growing up in an African - American
family of 10
children in inner - city Detroit is remarkably aligned
with the foundation's mission of helping kids and
families succeed in some of the
poorest corners of the U.S. Among other things, under Tabron's leadership at Kellogg, the foundation has doubled down on its prescient — and bold — racial equity work.
For over 50 years, regardless of the political environment or changes in the economy, GLIDE has stood
with the most vulnerable, including
poor people, those
with illness, people of color, immigrants, as well as all
families and
children fleeing war and oppression.
For nearly a century, Catholic Charities has helped
poor and neglected
children (whether Catholic or not) to find homes
with loving
families ready to nurture them.
1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women,
children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women /
children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the
poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your
family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the
poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes
with sword, turns
families against each other, those that love
family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not
with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against
children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your
family, you are an infidel)
The New Yorker Book of Kids» Cartoons (2001) features only three cartoons
with families of more than two
children — one a
family of fish, another of cats, and a third an obviously
poor, white, working - class
family.
Poor parents who have been enabled to choose any school for their
children are delighted
with the results, according to PAVE's annual report which is available free from
Family Service America, 11700 West Lake Park Drive, Milwaukee, WI 53224.
Children of single - parent
families are far more likely even when they are not
poor to do badly in school, get in trouble
with the law, have
poor mental and physical health, and have marital difficulties later in life.
Coming, as they often do, from
families with a history of
child and wife abuse, alcoholism, promiscuity,
poor nutrition, a lack of discipline and low academic achievement, they find adjustment to stricter, often fundamentalist standards difficult.
«You have to remember, he came from a very
poor family, and suddenly, when he was 16, still basically a
child, he was thrown into the public eye and faced
with a lot of pressure,» says his friend Valdano.
With older
children father involvement is inversely related to
family size and
poor school performance.
And these days, unless
children from
poor families get a college degree, their economic mobility is severely restricted: Young people who grow up in
families in the lowest income quintile (
with household income below about $ 21,500) and don't obtain a B.A. now have just a one in two chance of escaping that bottom economic bracket as adults.
And, he points to one program that simply injected cash — $ 3,000 — to
poor families with infants and toddlers, which relieved enough stress on parents to improve their
children's chances dramatically.
I think it is important to point out that this isn't just an issue for middle class
families who care deeply about their
child's diet and are able to provide abundant healthy food choices but school menus have great impact on many, many
poor children who, through no fault of their own and often
with no agency to change the situation, end up being pawns in the lunch tray wars.
• The father -
child relationship is especially important in disadvantaged
families where
children suffer more from a
poor relationship
with their father and benefit more when this is good (Dunn, 2004).
Given that
poor communication skills are strongly correlated
with violent behaviour in men, it seems likely that a father
with poor language skills will be more likely to act violently towards both his partner and his
children; or for
family interactions to be less productive and pleasant.
In experiments
with families at high risk for
poor child outcomes, researchers randomly assigned some mothers to receive training in responsive parenting techniques.
Still, advocates for the
poor remain alarmed that
with the potential for stepped - up auditing, many
children would be dropped from the school lunch program even if their
families meet the eligibility requirements.
Programs that are successful
with families at increased risk for
poor child development outcomes tend to be programs that offer a comprehensive focus — targeting
families» multiple needs — and therefore may be more expensive to develop, implement, and maintain.
If not, consider that many
families who had a
poor outcome
with a midwife have become bankrupt and have to rely on Medicaid and other forms of assistance to care for their
child.
For working - class and
poor families, the cultural logic of
child rearing at home is out of synch
with the standards of institutions.»
Some barriers include the negative attitudes of women and their partners and
family members, as well as health care professionals, toward breastfeeding, whereas the main reasons that women do not start or give up breastfeeding are reported to be
poor family and social support, perceived milk insufficiency, breast problems, maternal or infant illness, and return to outside employment.2 Several strategies have been used to promote breastfeeding, such as setting standards for maternity services3, 4 (eg, the joint World Health Organization — United Nations
Children's Fund [WHO - UNICEF] Baby Friendly Initiative), public education through media campaigns, and health professionals and peer - led initiatives to support individual mothers.5 — 9 Support from the infant's father through active participation in the breastfeeding decision, together
with a positive attitude and knowledge about the benefits of breastfeeding, has been shown to have a strong influence on the initiation and duration of breastfeeding in observational studies, 2,10 but scientific evidence is not available as to whether training fathers to manage the most common lactation difficulties can enhance breastfeeding rates.
Federal assistance is designed to help
poor families with nearly every essential need from housing to health care, but diapers — a product fundamental to
child health that no baby can do without — aren't included.
The freeze will hit the
poorest third in society the hardest and cause working
families with children lose as much as # 490 a year in
child benefit and tax credits.
Child trust funds, worth # 250 to every new baby, would be limited to the
poorest third of
families and those
with disabled
children.»
In a population - based Canadian study of
children with epilepsy, each of whom had access to universal health care, those from
poor families had the same medical course and remission rate as their wealthier counterparts, but they had a less favorable social outcome as adults.
In Dominican and African American
families from
poor areas of New York City, living in a neighborhood
with dense traffic and industrial facilities increased a
child's risk of developing asthma, according to Miller and other Columbia University researchers.
The findings are especially relevant to
families with children living in low - income households; these kids are at greater risk of health problems resulting from
poor air quality.
A review of the
child's diet revealed
poor family nutritional habits
with uncontrolled counting of calories and fat.
Low - income
families are defined as those
with incomes less than two times the Federal Poverty Threshold (about $ 47,000 for a
family of four
with two
children) and
poor families are defined as those
with incomes below the threshold (about $ 24,000 for a
family of four
with two
children).
Moreover, other research has revealed that
children from
poor families often start school
with inadequate social - emotional skills, which can stymie academic progress.
Psychologist Fonda Davis Eyler and pediatrician Marylou Behnke studied 300
children from
poor families with similar racial backgrounds.
«While reforms like No
Child Left Behind empower local communities
with valuable information, this information is not enough to mobilize
poor families, thus leaving behind the group that No
Child Left Behind explicitly sought to help,» Holbein said.
In Afghanistan and Pakistan today the Taliban have created thousands of madrassas, where
children from
poor families with no access to education can receive food and what passes for learning (but what is in fact quite the opposite).
NCCP defines a
poor household as one where incomes are below the federal poverty threshold (i.e., $ 24,036 for a
family of four
with two
children in 2015).
Out of all the
children, boys,
children from larger
families, as well as those
with more cognitive, motor or behaviour problems, and
poorer parent - infant relationships in infancy, had fewer friends, met them less and were less accepted by them.
Families with earnings less than twice the poverty threshold are considered low income and include poor families (i.e., $ 48,072 for a family of four with two children i
Families with earnings less than twice the poverty threshold are considered low income and include
poor families (i.e., $ 48,072 for a family of four with two children i
families (i.e., $ 48,072 for a
family of four
with two
children in 2015).
A
family is considered
poor if its earnings are below 100 percent of the poverty threshold (e.g., $ 24,008 for a
family of four
with two
children in 2014).
Intended to help schools address the attainment gap amongst
children from low income
families, some of this funding could be used to address the digital divide and ensure pupils who have
poor home access are equipped
with the resources they need.
«Because, as a result,
children from low - income
families are less likely to attend schools
with children from affluent
families, and this ultimately isolates the
poor kids.»
«From these findings, we know that naturally occurring decreases in
family income - to - needs were associated
with worse developmental outcomes for
children from
poor families,» says Dearing, who coauthored the study
with Kathleen McCartney, a professor at HGSE, and Beck Taylor, an economist at Baylor University.