Sentences with phrase «poor general parenting»

Not exact matches

Indeed, he creates a virtual phantasmagoria of suffering from actual instances of human barbarity that he has read about in Russian newspapers: Turkish soldiers cutting babies from their mother's wombs and throwing them in the air in order to impale them on their bayonets; enlightened parents stuffing their five - year - old daughter's mouth with excrement and locking her in a freezing privy all night for having wet the bed, while they themselves sleep soundly; Genevan Christians teaching a naive peasant to bless the good God even as the poor dolt is beheaded for thefts and murders that his ostensibly Christian society caused him to commit; a Russian general, offended at an eight - year - old boy for accidentally hurting the paw of the officer's dog, inciting his wolfhounds to tear the child to pieces; a lady and gentleman flogging their eight - year - old daughter with a birch - rod until she collapses while crying for mercy, «Papa, papa, dear papa.»

Teaching children skills such as how to cope with bullying at school, poor performance or problems with their parents, for example, in the framework of general cognitive preventative treatment and resilience training in school, may help children to better deal with emotional turmoil and challenging situations during adolescence.

However, both parents and the general public give lower grades to schools with a high percentage of students from poor families.

As reported by The Telegraph, the NAHT's general secretary advised its members that they should only travel to work if they could do so safely, but urged school leaders to not to leave parents «in the lurch» with poor communication.

There are some myths among educators and the general middle - class non-minority public: Poor and minority parents want and support lower standards for their children and also prefer social promotion.

As a general rule, a teenager should be involved in making important decisions if the parents agree the opportunity to make the decision is valuable, and the value of that opportunity outweighs any possible harm of a poor decision.

These included characteristics on multiple levels of the child's biopsychosocial context: (1) child factors: race / ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian / Pacific Islander / Alaska Native), age, gender, 9 - month Bayley Mental and Motor scores, birth weight (normal, moderately low, or very low), parent - rated child health (fair / poor vs good / very good / excellent), and hours per week in child care; (2) parent factors: maternal age, paternal age, SES (an ECLS - B — derived variable that includes maternal and paternal education, employment status, and income), maternal marital status (married, never married, separated / divorced / widowed), maternal general health (fair / poor versus good / very good / excellent), maternal depression (assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale at 9 months and the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview at 2 years), prenatal use of tobacco and alcohol (any vs none), and violence against the mother; (3) household factors: single - parent household, number of siblings (0, 1, 2, or 3 +), language spoken at home (English vs non-English), neighborhood good for raising kids (excellent / very good, good, or fair / poor), household urbanicity (urban city, urban county, or rural), and modified Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment — Short Form (HOME - SF) score.

Many home visiting programs aim to educate parents about the importance of supporting children's early learning through frequent reading and a stimulating home environment and provide parents with the tools to support their children's early learning.15 In general, evaluations of home visiting programs show fairly positive impacts on parents» support for children's learning, though the evidence is strongest for the most disadvantaged program participants (e.g., poor, unmarried teens; very - low income participants).

The reasons couples seek the help of a therapist include affairs, lack of intimacy, trust issues, arguing, misaligned values, parenting differences, poor communication, alcohol or drug issues or a general dissatisfaction with the relationship.

[4] In general, courts have straddled this issue by rejecting PAS as a syndrome, but frequently finding that one parent has engaged in alienating behavior in some cases or that the other parent engaged in abusive behavior or poor parenting in others.

For poor general health, social, emotional and behavioural difficulties and dental health, parenting accounted for 33 %, 40 % and 38 % of the association between adversity and health.

At this stage some of the parenting measures dropped out of the analysis, leaving only irregular mealtimes as a predictor of poor general health and Pianta conflict and irregular mealtimes as a predictor of total difficulties.

Even after taking account of the child's social background and family circumstances, low overall parenting skills were associated with poorer general health, greater longstanding illness, poorer mental health, worse dental health, lower physical activity, higher screen time, lower fruit and vegetable consumption, and more snacking amongst children.

In multivariate analysis that took account of other family and maternal characteristics, the MCS study found that two measures of family organisation (regular bed and mealtimes) were the only parenting behaviours predicting poor general health.

High parenting skill reduced the association between adversity and health by between 33 % and 44 % for poor general health, limiting long term illness, social, emotional and behavioural difficulties, and poor dental health.

In relation to conduct problems, the results of the revised model suggest that children who live in stable lone parent or repartnered lone parent families, those with poorer general health and those who have experienced harsh discipline are all at a greater risk of their conduct problems increasing in the pre-school to primary school period.

After taking account of the child's social background and family circumstances, low overall parenting skills were associated with poorer general health, greater longstanding illness, poorer mental health, worse dental health, lower physical activity, higher screen time, lower fruit and vegetable consumption, and more snacking amongst children.

In general, the child characteristics that were significant predictors of treatment outcomes followed a similar pattern to that for the parent characteristics, with children showing poorer initial functioning showing greater gains with treatment (i.e., more internalizing symptoms, more temperamental difficulty, greater functional impairment), but the children with less severe initial problems showing lower levels of ODD - related symptoms at each trial.

Target Population: Parents and caregivers of preteens and teens ages 10 to 17 with a wide range of problems including oppositional behavior, poor self - esteem, lack of general life skills

Parents with poor parenting skills, lack of education regarding parenting techniques for more challenging children, and family problems; parent of a child with any of a wide range of problematic behaviors, thoughts, or traits including oppositional behavior, poor self - esteem, and a lack of general life skills

For parents of teens and preteens who have a wide range of problems including oppositional behavior, poor self - esteem, lack of general life skills; for parents with poor parenting skills, lack of education for dealing with challenging teens, or family problems

The Parent Project directly addresses the following Risk Factors of the Youth Level of Service / Case Management Inventory Assessment Tool: General offenses, Restlessness, Risk taking, Aggression, Physical violence, Crimes against person, Antisocial behavior, Substance abuse, Poor parent - child relationships, Harsh or lax discipline, Poor monitoring / supervision, Low parental involvement, Antisocial parents, Abusive parents, Family conflict, Poor school attendance and performance, Antisocial - delinquent peers, and Gang membeParent Project directly addresses the following Risk Factors of the Youth Level of Service / Case Management Inventory Assessment Tool: General offenses, Restlessness, Risk taking, Aggression, Physical violence, Crimes against person, Antisocial behavior, Substance abuse, Poor parent - child relationships, Harsh or lax discipline, Poor monitoring / supervision, Low parental involvement, Antisocial parents, Abusive parents, Family conflict, Poor school attendance and performance, Antisocial - delinquent peers, and Gang membeparent - child relationships, Harsh or lax discipline, Poor monitoring / supervision, Low parental involvement, Antisocial parents, Abusive parents, Family conflict, Poor school attendance and performance, Antisocial - delinquent peers, and Gang membership.

Understanding the mechanisms of poor functioning as an outcome of trauma experienced by parents and their children would greatly improve our capacity to understand children's response to trauma in general.

Poor parenting did not lead to a general vulnerability to later life events, and socio - economic status and financial hardship were not implicated in the link between parental behaviour and adult symptoms.