Sentences with phrase «poor health scores»

Women in the top tertile of the omnivore nutrient pattern had better overall poor health scores than those in the bottom tertile and had lower odds of psychological distress, such as anxiety and depression.

Not exact matches

«Children who have been in extended daycare and preschool programs have: poorer work habits, inferior peer relationships, substandard emotional health, lower grades and standardized test scores, and are more difficult to discipline.

Another study of 2,900 Australian infants assessed at ages 1, 2 3, 5, 8, 10, and 14 years found that infants breastfed for 6 months or longer, had lower externalizing, internalizing, and total behaviour problem scores throughout childhood and into adolescence than never breastfed and infants fed for less than 6 months.8 These differences remained after statistical control for the presence of both biological parents in the home, low income and other factors associated with poor mental health.

The study scored workers as having «ideal,» «intermediate» or «poor» cardiovascular health in the seven areas.

The most significant control variables indicated an increase in the expected psychological distress score among those who were younger, female, in fair or poor personal health, had at least one chronic health condition, were current smokers or did not average the recommended range of seven to nine hours of sleep per day.

The latest paper from the study, appearing this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has found a strong relationship between low credit scores and poor cardiovascular health.

It's that the sort of personal attributes that can lead to a poor credit score can also contribute to poor health.

In addition, though 88 percent of the women had antibodies to prior dengue infection, the researchers found no positive or negative association between prior immunity to dengue with Zika severity score, Zika viral load or poor infant health or death.

In our two previous research collaborations with the Skills for Life team, we already had shown that mental health problems are quite common, are among the strongest predictors of poor attendance, poorer grades, and lower scores on standardized tests, and that improved mental health scores are powerful predictors of improved academic outcomes.»

Gallagher says despite our occasional reluctance to accept BMI as an indicator of physical health, evidence shows there is an association between higher BMI scores and poorer health outcomes for individuals.

The Colour Purple (Quincy Jones provided the music), Bridge of Spies (Williams dropped out due to poor health, and recommended Thomas Newman to Spielberg as his replacement) and Ready Player One, which Williams was supposed to score, but dropped out of, in order to work on The Post instead.

Evidence collated by Public Health England, «The link between pupil health and well - being and attainment», highlights that pupils with better emotional well - being at age seven had a value - added Key Stage 2 score 2.46 points higher than pupils with poorer emotional well - being, equivalent to more than one term's proHealth England, «The link between pupil health and well - being and attainment», highlights that pupils with better emotional well - being at age seven had a value - added Key Stage 2 score 2.46 points higher than pupils with poorer emotional well - being, equivalent to more than one term's prohealth and well - being and attainment», highlights that pupils with better emotional well - being at age seven had a value - added Key Stage 2 score 2.46 points higher than pupils with poorer emotional well - being, equivalent to more than one term's progress.

According to the Demos study: 31 percent of households who have had a member out of work for two months or longer in the past three years, reported that their credit score had declined over the same period of time; households that include someone without health coverage were twice as likely to report declined credit scores; and 23 percent of indebted households raising children described their credit scores as poor, compared with 12 percent of indebted households without kids.

According to America's Health Rankings, the state's poor rankings in obesity rate (49th), air pollution (45th), cardiovascular deaths (49th), premature death (48th), and infant mortality rate (48th) has created an overall health and wellness score that was third worst in the country inHealth Rankings, the state's poor rankings in obesity rate (49th), air pollution (45th), cardiovascular deaths (49th), premature death (48th), and infant mortality rate (48th) has created an overall health and wellness score that was third worst in the country inhealth and wellness score that was third worst in the country in 2009.

There was substantial overlap in the reported outcomes: among those reporting fair / poor general health 35.7 % reported poor mental well - being, malaise score ⩾ 7, and 27.3 % long - standing illness limiting daily activities; among those with poor mental health 37.9 % reported fair / poor general health and 20.9 % long - standing limiting illness; and among those reporting long - standing limiting illness 52.3 % reported fair / poor general health and 38.1 % poor mental health (p < 0.001, χ2 test for association between each of the outcomes).

Mothers were eligible to participate if they did not require the use of an interpreter, and reported one or more of the following risk factors for poor maternal or child outcomes in their responses to routine standardised psychosocial and domestic violence screening conducted by midwives for every mother booking in to the local hospital for confinement: maternal age under 19 years; current probable distress (assessed as an Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) 17 score of 10 or more)(as a lower cut - off score was used than the antenatal validated cut - off score for depression, the term «distress» is used rather than «depression»; use of this cut - off to indicate those distressed approximated the subgroups labelled in other trials as «psychologically vulnerable» or as having «low psychological resources» 14); lack of emotional and practical support; late antenatal care (after 20 weeks gestation); major stressors in the past 12 months; current substance misuse; current or history of mental health problem or disorder; history of abuse in mother's own childhood; and history of domestic violence.

Childhood socioeconomic deprivation, family housing tenure other than consistent home ownership, family disruption, lack of parental interest, behaviour problems, low academic test scores and health difficulties were each clearly associated with poor mental well - being in adulthood when estimated by analysing each childhood measure individually, adjusting for cohort and gender, and in the full model considering all childhood measures, although they were to some extent attenuated.

Subgroup analyses: We will examine whether there is evidence that the intervention effect is modified for subgroups within the trial participants using tests of interaction between intervention and child and family factors as follows: parity (first - born vs other), antenatal risks (2 vs 3 or more risk factors at screening), maternal mental health at baseline (high vs low score) 18, 62, 63 and self - efficacy at baseline (poor vs normal mastery) 35 using the regression models described above with additional terms for interaction between subgroup and trial arm.

Generally, a pattern emerged where participants with a consistently low probability of being poor scored lower on mental health problems compared with participants with some exposure to relative poverty.

These included characteristics on multiple levels of the child's biopsychosocial context: (1) child factors: race / ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian / Pacific Islander / Alaska Native), age, gender, 9 - month Bayley Mental and Motor scores, birth weight (normal, moderately low, or very low), parent - rated child health (fair / poor vs good / very good / excellent), and hours per week in child care; (2) parent factors: maternal age, paternal age, SES (an ECLS - B — derived variable that includes maternal and paternal education, employment status, and income), maternal marital status (married, never married, separated / divorced / widowed), maternal general health (fair / poor versus good / very good / excellent), maternal depression (assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale at 9 months and the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview at 2 years), prenatal use of tobacco and alcohol (any vs none), and violence against the mother; (3) household factors: single - parent household, number of siblings (0, 1, 2, or 3 +), language spoken at home (English vs non-English), neighborhood good for raising kids (excellent / very good, good, or fair / poor), household urbanicity (urban city, urban county, or rural), and modified Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment — Short Form (HOME - SF) health (fair / poor vs good / very good / excellent), and hours per week in child care; (2) parent factors: maternal age, paternal age, SES (an ECLS - B — derived variable that includes maternal and paternal education, employment status, and income), maternal marital status (married, never married, separated / divorced / widowed), maternal general health (fair / poor versus good / very good / excellent), maternal depression (assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale at 9 months and the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview at 2 years), prenatal use of tobacco and alcohol (any vs none), and violence against the mother; (3) household factors: single - parent household, number of siblings (0, 1, 2, or 3 +), language spoken at home (English vs non-English), neighborhood good for raising kids (excellent / very good, good, or fair / poor), household urbanicity (urban city, urban county, or rural), and modified Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment — Short Form (HOME - SF) health (fair / poor versus good / very good / excellent), maternal depression (assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale at 9 months and the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview at 2 years), prenatal use of tobacco and alcohol (any vs none), and violence against the mother; (3) household factors: single - parent household, number of siblings (0, 1, 2, or 3 +), language spoken at home (English vs non-English), neighborhood good for raising kids (excellent / very good, good, or fair / poor), household urbanicity (urban city, urban county, or rural), and modified Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment — Short Form (HOME - SF) Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview at 2 years), prenatal use of tobacco and alcohol (any vs none), and violence against the mother; (3) household factors: single - parent household, number of siblings (0, 1, 2, or 3 +), language spoken at home (English vs non-English), neighborhood good for raising kids (excellent / very good, good, or fair / poor), household urbanicity (urban city, urban county, or rural), and modified Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment — Short Form (HOME - SF) score.

The findings showed that, in general, the higher the family adversity index score, the higher the prevalence of poor child health and health behaviours.

A respondent is defined as having «poor» mental health at sweeps 1 and / or 3 if she has a score on SF12 (MCS) which fell more than one standard deviation below the mean population score for that sweep.

Thirteen per cent of children had a total difficulties score that was indicative of, or bordered on, severe social, behavioural and / or emotional problems (sometimes referred to as «poor mental health» in this report).

Indeed, signs of poor general health and delay in language development at age 2 were predictors of some of the highest difficulty scores at school entry.

This indicates that the odds of children whose health was temporarily or always poor having a conduct problems score in the borderline or abnormal range at school entry are 2.09 times greater than they are for children whose health is always good or very good (the reference category).

The increase with family adversity was particularly steep for poor mental health (difficulties score) and poor dental health.

Children with poor health behaviours were more likely to be in poor general and mental health (poor mental health being measured as having a mild or severe total difficulties score).

Although it is quite likely that some of the women who had scores indicative of poorer mental health on more than one occasion were experiencing long standing difficulties, we would urge caution in over-extrapolation.

This analysis used within - cohort scores to define those with poorer mental health in relation to other mothers rather than defining these women as suffering from a mental illness which meets The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria.

This clearly demonstrates a strong association between deprivation and poor psychosocial health at this very young age; the proportion of children with borderline or abnormal scores increased in line with increasing deprivation.

Children with poor health behaviours were more likely to be in poor general and mental health (poor mental health being measured as having a moderate or severe total difficulties score).

At sweeps 2 and 4, poor mental health is defined in relation to DASS scores which fall more than one standard deviation above the mean for the cohort.

Poor mental health at the first sweep was a strong predictor of having poor mental health scores recorded at a subsequent sweep or sweeps: two - thirds (67 %) who had poor mental health at Sweep 1 went on to have mental health problems at subsequent swePoor mental health at the first sweep was a strong predictor of having poor mental health scores recorded at a subsequent sweep or sweeps: two - thirds (67 %) who had poor mental health at Sweep 1 went on to have mental health problems at subsequent swepoor mental health scores recorded at a subsequent sweep or sweeps: two - thirds (67 %) who had poor mental health at Sweep 1 went on to have mental health problems at subsequent swepoor mental health at Sweep 1 went on to have mental health problems at subsequent sweeps.

The scale does not have thresholds defining whether a score suggests the presence of a psychiatric disorder, so we have followed the approach taken in a previous GUS report (Marryat and Martin, 2010) and defined a relative threshold below which we classify mothers as having «poor» mental health (16 % of mothers were in this category in 2009/10), as opposed to «average or good» mental health.

On the other hand, of those who had poor mental health at Sweep 1, two - thirds (67 %) went on to have poor mental health scores recorded at a subsequent sweep or sweeps.

Higher family adversity index scores were associated with higher prevalence of poor child health and health behaviours, with two exceptions.

over time, where students experience racism they consistently had lower health scores, decreased health / well being and poorer education outcomes.