But some workers» paychecks aren't so bond - like — think of folks who work on commission or have
poor job security — and they should probably compensate by investing their portfolios more conservatively.
You might think that postdocs, with their low salaries,
poor job security, and often poor working conditions, would be less happy than most other scientists.
Worker Exploitation: Many banana plantation workers work long hours in difficult conditions - handling pesticides and herbicides without sufficient protection - for low wages and
poor job security.
Not exact matches
Side by side with the welfare state for the
poor (welfare, public service
jobs, unemployment compensation, social
security, Medicare), there has arisen a welfare state for the rich that is awesome to contemplate.
Add that outrageous betrayal of trust to her 2009 self - appointed pay raise (and the entire city council) that defied a majority opposition to any pay raise voiced at a public hearing, followed by disobeying public referendum laws that recognized term limits that she abrogated (in favor of arranging an unlawful third term for Michael Bloomberg to serve, that automatically guaranteed her own
job security), plus a final and detrimental insult to the working
poor that blocked our rightful vote on sick pay coverage, and collectively, it would make total sense to impeach and prosecute such unethical, improper and unfair conduct — that is unbecoming to anyone purporting to serve their constituency.
IDS needs the money because he now knows about social
security's «iron triangle» — that it is impossible to do all the things he wants at once: raise the
poor's incomes, raise their employment levels (assuming the
jobs are there) and cut welfare spending.
Another important reason for women to seek full - time well - paying
jobs is
poor social
security the government is able to grant to the women.
M & R's suggestion that public employees somehow do not have greater
job security than comparable private workers is based on
poor reasoning.
Of course, the latter survey doesn't indicate whether teachers are ambivalent because the unions aren't fighting hard enough against policy changes affecting
job security or because they're fighting too hard to defend
poor performers.
On the other hand, 38 percent said California teachers shouldn't be given tenure, which comes with strong
job security and makes it more difficult to fire
poor - performing teachers, and another 35 percent said tenure should not be granted until a teacher has been on the
job for at least 4 to 10 years.
D.C. teachers have to give up some of their
job security and will be fired for
poor performance.
If there is no meaningful threat to funding and
job security because of
poor performance, there is no accountability.
You may suffer from
poorer health, lower productivity at work, and lost employer - paid health benefits, Social
Security, and pension income if you leave your
job.
Here's the list from top to bottom, with the economy listed as a top priority by 85 percent of those polled and global warming 30 percent: the economy,
jobs, terrorism, Social
Security, education, energy, Medicare, health care, deficit reduction, health insurance, helping the
poor, crime, moral decline, military, tax cuts, environment, immigration, lobbyists, trade policy, global warming.
For billions more of our planet's inhabitants who qualify as working
poor or middle class, it means a downward economic spiral toward lower and lower living standards, less opportunity, and less
job security.
Tchernobyl is mainly caused by the encounter of stalinian lack of respect for
security, with modern «management by profitability»... after decennies of pure soviet management, the mix of management pressure with soviet terror, cooked with economic weakness lead to the drama... then soviet hiding, occidental cowardness, NGO fear mongering, crony capitalism son of Washington Consensus, finish the dirty
job... and most of the dead and
poor are not linked to radioactivity, but to crony capitalism and fear mongers.