The lack of a campaign, poor balancing between infantry and starfighters, a limited «Space Battle» mode, small number of maps and long loading times were just a few things that led to people's
poor opinions of the game.
Not exact matches
Both teams have had a
poor start to the campaign, Chelsea worse so than us but if it is the
opinion of the author that simply because we are 3 points ahead
of the champions after 4
games in that «there is little reason to think it will change any time soon» then I think he is misguided.
negatives -LRB--)-- terrible result — wengers team selection (arteta + ozil in particular)-- generally
poor work - rate across the pitch and nothing like the backbone we showed against man city — handing dortmund initiative to top the group (we all know what finishing 2nd means)-- lack
of hunger + desire — welbeck misses — still no joel campbell (who in my personal
opinion is a big
game / stage player)-- in all our «set - piece» training we totally forgot about the bread and butter
of football which is making an impact in open play
I understand what your saying but Ozil is no Bergkamp he doesn't have the aggression strength and nasty streak that Dennis had and he doesn't obviously have the finishing ability
of Dennis in the 10 role Ozil is a nice tidy player who coasts through
games and has great vision and an eye for a pass but there isn't much else to his
game in my
opinion defensively he is really
poor although our team as a whole collectively are at times.
He has played the majority
of Liverpool's
games when he's fit but so far this season has only scored three goals and has only four assists to his name which is a
poor return I'm my
opinion for a player
of his so called calibre.
In my
opinion, that is 6 points dropped due to extremely
poor refereeing decisions at times
of the
game where it had a massive impact.
In my
opinion the
poor story mode and the absence
of the online play really hurts the
game's overall value.
like I said the world is big and many people won't share your stupid fantard
opinions, I own both
of these console I've been a handheld
gamer since 7 years old and one thing I know is that I LOVE ALL handhelds and I won't bash another because
of its
poor sales or support, rather I will support it more.
Those are both
poor ways
of forming
opinions: a
game should be judged by its own merits, and yet my own cynicism says that will be exactly what happens, to which I hope I'm utterly wrong.
I am basing my «
poor»
opinions, as you say, solely on what Insomniac has ACTUALLY shown
of this
game.
Similar to the
poor IP's I have discussed, I will now begin to discuss 4 more IP's that were, in my
opinion and the
opinion of many recognised reviewers, very good
games but failed to capture enough people's hearts to warrant another title in the franchise.
Both
of these
games were pretty
poor, in my
opinion, and didn't give me the Duke Nukem fix I needed.