So the working
poor pay less tax in the US (and also receive fewer benefits).
Not exact matches
«Dividend cuts would take more from
poor people than rich people because rich people would
pay less taxes if their dividend was cut,» said Gunnar Knapp, a top economist on the region at the Institute of Social and Economic Research at the University of Alaska Anchorage.
All that campaign cash has helped buy a state and local
tax system that's regressive — where the wealthy actually
pay less than the
poor and middle class, and nowhere near their fair share
The 5 million
poorest households are
paying more in
tax and receiving
less in benefits than when Labour came to power, a difference that adds up to # 1,300 per annum.
The government pension plan is funded via
taxes and
pays out a means tested amount, so well to do people get
less (possibly nothing) than
poor people do.
The Lib Dems unveiled evidence today that the
poorest 20 % of people are losing more of their income in
tax than they did in 1997, while the richest 20 % are
paying less.
It is worth noting that while people under age 65 in the U.S. live in a heavily market - dominated economy where
poor employment outcomes mean poverty and a lack of access to health care, almost everyone over age 65 has most of their healthcare
paid for by Medicare, (a FICA
tax financed, single payer system that
pays providers more or
less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost controls), more than half of their nursing home costs
paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it
pays providers and moderately means tested), and receives enough of a guaranteed income from the combination of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings of their own), above the poverty line, regardless of the state of the local economy.
He says they'd have to
pay $ 294 more dollars in additional federal
pay roll
taxes, nearly $ 3000 in additional state and federal personal income
taxes, and would receive $ 1300
less in earned income
tax credits for the working
poor.
And the IFS added in its observations on Lib Dem policies on Monday, «it is
less clear that the proposal to increase the income
tax personal allowance to # 10,000 will help many of the
poorest households, as the
poorest fifth of households will contain those with incomes too low to
pay income
tax.
This would be a graduated income
tax leading to the «rich
paying their fair share and the
poor paying less.»
whilst australia's
poor & marginalised — not a large number in a country with a total population of
less than 23 million —
pay disproportionately for all the Government increases in tobacco
taxes at home, the fact is our highly - populated asian neighbours are taking up smoking at a rapid rate and no doubt adding some $ $ $ to tobacoo company revenues in the developed world!
And if you think the
poor, taxi and truck drivers should
paid more in direct
taxes and you can't imagine politicians adding complexity with exceptions and or bonuses for
less CO2 emitting, etc..
This is because a
tax effectively imposes a higher
tax rate relative to ability to
pay on
poor states than it does on more affluent states and there has always been a significant disparity between more affluent and
less affluent states in the United States).