Following its launch, the new model was widely panned by the automotive press due to
the poor quality of its interior and ride, and for the first time, it failed to earn a Consumer Reports recommendation.
Not exact matches
Yet, the review in this test rates it at 4.0 / 5 and mentioned «
poor» build
quality of the
interior.
145K, engine / tranny never skips a beat, paint still looks 95 % new,
interior indestructible, tackles anything asked
of it and at 10 years old, people still comment on how incredible it looks and can't believe it's a 99:) The fuel economy is
poor but I'm guessing if you're looking at the Cruiser, you're more concerned with safety, ride
quality, dependability, and bring me anywhere and return me safe - ability.
As the price climbs through the $ 30,000 range, features pile on, like power sliding doors, power tailgate, leather
interior, sunshades, driving and parking aids, and upgraded stereo, there is value for your money, but Chrysler might have a hard time convincing people to part with more than $ 40,000 when many perceive the brand as a bastion
of poor reliability and low
quality.
In April
of 2011, Honda unveiled the Civic's ninth generation, but was quickly criticized for the car's lackluster
interior and
poor ride
quality, even failing to earn a recommendation from Consumer Reports for the first time in the model's history.
The
interior of the Entourage is not lavish but it is certainly not
poor quality and the adjustable second row seating affords you added comfort.
Driving this Audi does not induce fatigue upon its occupants, as the
interior coddles them while the suspension's nicely reactive character does not come with the price
of poor ride
quality.
high road noise, rough idle, front passenger seat shakes when idling, seat belt buckles rattle against the
interior side panels, doors are
poor quality, fan comes on in the off position.I took the car to the dealer three times to fix fan switch and they said that there was nothing wrong with the switch and that they would fix it but I would have to sign a disclaimer form.I traded the hunk
of junk and lost a lot
of money.
Cons: Build
quality is
poor (body panels are a bit off - the hood fit is particularly
poor, white body paint doesn't match bumper color, a few
interior rattles even with just 3000 miles), dealer service is the worse I've experienced anywhere (Major World Dodge in NYC), side mirrors are too small and have blind spots no matter how they are adjusted (definitely get the tech package with blind spot detection), hard to see the front
of the car over the scoop (Dodge does not offer front parking sensors).
Although the
quality of materials and finish seems to be good, but the
poor color scheme makes the
interior look out -
of - date.
The rest
of the
interior is still Dark Ages: an unattractive hodgepodge
of controls in an excessively angular black panel, wispy ventilation and several examples
of poor quality control.
A common complaint in reviews
of the old Fisker Karma was
poor interior quality, but this seems to have been addressed in the car's reinvigoration.