From a total of 19 schools, the three or four most similar schools were identified within each of the five urban areas and randomly assigned to one of three conditions were 1) GBG, 2) the Mastery Learning (ML) program (designed to improve
poor reading achievement), and 3) an external control condition with no experimental intervention.
The International Reading Association recently co-published Summer Reading: Closing the Rich /
Poor Reading Achievement Gap.
Not exact matches
The fact that math and
reading achievement results are overly narrow and easily distorted makes them particularly
poor indicators of quality and weak predictors of later - life outcomes.
The study, conducted by McCartney, Boston College Associate Professor Eric Dearing, and Samford University Professor Beck Taylor, looked at
reading and math
achievement of more than 1,300 children in middle childhood from economic backgrounds ranging from
poor to affluent.
Since the causes of most early
reading difficulties are similar regardless of whether a
poor reader meets the aptitude /
achievement - discrepancy definition of LD, it makes no sense to wait for a discrepancy to reveal itself.
For the past decade, school reform has been primarily about «closing
achievement gaps» by boosting math and
reading proficiency and graduation rates, among black, Latino, and
poor students.
Indeed, the most important (and uncertain) premise of
Reading First was that it could catalyze and support meaningful change in the SEAs — could help them build agile expert systems that gave high - quality support to schools and districts — and thereby improve reading achievement among the poor, not just in isolated schools and districts as in the past but across entire
Reading First was that it could catalyze and support meaningful change in the SEAs — could help them build agile expert systems that gave high - quality support to schools and districts — and thereby improve
reading achievement among the poor, not just in isolated schools and districts as in the past but across entire
reading achievement among the
poor, not just in isolated schools and districts as in the past but across entire states.
They encourage
poor practice, waste instructional time, and materially damage
reading achievement, especially for our most vulnerable children.
In the process, Obama and Duncan are retreating from the very commitment of federal education policy, articulated through No Child, to set clear goals for improving student
achievement in
reading and mathematics, to declare to urban, suburban, and rural districts that they could no longer continue to commit educational malpractice against
poor and minority children, and to end policies that damn children to low expectations.
No Child Left Behind, first passed in 2002, was an ambitious, bipartisan attempt to close
achievement gaps between
poor and minority students and their peers by setting a goal for all students to eventually become proficient in
reading and math.
A
poor - performing North Carolina school under Needs Improvement for a fifth consecutive year (and forced to develop a restructuring plan) improved
reading performance by six percent of a standard deviation, while math
achievement improved by nearly three percent of a standard deviation.
To raise
achievement levels among
poor students on a grander scale, the report recommends allowing principals at opportunity schools to train other school leaders and increasing the number of social workers and
reading interventionists in schools.
As a result of such disparities, contributor Sean Reardon finds that the gap between rich and
poor children's math and
reading achievement scores is now much larger than it was fifty years ago.
By Stefan Johansson In a previous issue of Phi Delta Kappan, Yong Zhao (2012) urged readers to stop worrying so much about the relatively
poor performance of American students on measures such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which compares the mathematics, science, and
reading achievement of 15 - year - olds from dozens of countries (OECD, -LSB-...]
In Ohio for example, where the charter sector has been struggling with
poor student
achievement results for over a decade, charter schools in Cleveland are producing positive learning gains for their students in both
reading and math, compared to students attending traditional district schools in the city.22 In Ohio in particular, the Cleveland School District has been a willing participant in partnering with a high - performing charter management organization, Breakthrough Schools, to ensure that these charter schools have the autonomy and accountability, as well as the access to financial resources and school facilities, necessary to produce high - quality results.
While each subgroup of students — including economically disadvantaged children — made progress this year,
achievement gaps remained stubbornly large: 92 percent of white students were proficient in
reading, for example, compared with 52 percent of Hispanic students, 44 percent of black students and 42 percent of
poor children.
More importantly, it serves children struggling with
reading and other
achievement gaps — especially kids from
poor and minority households — abysmally.
Information is not relevant to the job Wordy, vague, unfocused, rambling Focuses on responsibilities rather than
achievements Lacks performance results — concrete ways your employers benefited from your skills No examples of
achievements or success — awards and promotions Lacks hard numbers to back up
achievements Work history is spotty, fraudulent or missing Education is overemphasized Crucial skills are buried and hard to find Layout is too difficult to
read quickly Typos,
poor grammar, outdated terminology
In a third hypothesis, some individuals with CD and
poor achievement especially those with
reading disorder (dyslexia) have an underlying disorder of cognitive processing called the Hebb repetition effect, which includes selective impairment in cognitive tasks that involve processing of serial order, even for nonverbal modalities.