Sentences with phrase «poor science»

There are so many examples of poor science passing peer review that no - one even with a passing interest in science would think that peer - review separates the good from the bad.

With poor science funding my postdoctoral time only increases leaving me unable to pay my loans off.

Experience shows that companies with strong science and good executive leadership can fail due to poor science management.

Students who do not learn science during the elementary years are likely to have poor science understanding through adulthood.

Perhaps their version makes for a better story, but it's rather poor science.

My impression of this is that there is a concerted effort to place a body of poor science within the published record that allows for a «second track» of study.

It's one of many errors made to achieve a result; actions that are the opposite of even poor science.

It is not because of poor communication, it is because of poor science.

It's not just poor science — Japan's «scientific» whaling may be a human health risk too.

«GM corn - tumor link based on poor science.»

Rising Above «The Gathering Storm» 14 December 2007 A report from the Urban Institute casts doubt on claims that America suffers from poor science education and a shortage of qualified scientists.

A report from the Urban Institute casts doubt on claims that America suffers from poor science education and a shortage of qualified scientists

This is important because short - term climate variability can be misinterpreted as underlying climate change resulting in poor science and potentially worse policy decisions.

Can anyone cite a counter example - some instance where professional scientists have praised the actions of a Bush political appointee in correcting poor science?

The culture in the science community does that by valuing the debunking of poor science as much as creation of new science.

It's also poor science because it makes predictions impossible if God is randomly pulling the strings.

And in this case, I think the AAFP is overblowing the case for breastfeeding beyond a year, citing poor science to support their opinion.

Poor science always makes me question underlying motives.

That is, although I firmly believe that AGW is ocurring, I do not believe that (some segments of) the climate science community have done themselves any favors by appearing to conspire against dissenting views, by soemtimes producing poor science and by poor selection of sources in official reports.

This is not accidentally poor science, IT IS FRAUD.

If they had stated the exact same assumption with the exact same poor science and blamed it on global cooling it would never have been excepted and would never have earned the title of peer reviewed science.

They were tired of orchestrated complaints about Bob's writings and lectures on climate change and could not handle the person who showed that polite argument against poor science and reasoning can defeat politicised science.

In considering the straits in which the practice of science finds itself, it would be a good thing to remember that while Climate Science is often an example of extraordinarily poor science, there are may examples from other fields as well, ranging from biology to cosmology.

Unfortunately, that is god politics, but ver poor science...

Especially on the Parmesan butterfly study, and on the Arctic issues, you have seen right through some shockingly poor science»

Poor Science Messaging Is Only Part of the Reason For Climate Action Opposition All of which sounds fine to me.

What ought to be troubling is the impact of poor science today in the here and now

The history of research in this area is littered with poor science, muddled thinking and confusion, which is still with us today.

This book took Taubes five years to write and explains in - depth his proposal that what is generally promoted as a healthy diet is actually based on poor science and outdated theories.

Greenpa: When has there ever been an instance when a political appointee «corrected poor science»?