Obviously, while there were some pockets of good teaching going on there were also some pockets
of poor teaching in terms of what was expected.
Good teachers help all children but disadvantaged children benefit more than anyone else because they often lack the family resources that could compensate
for poor teaching.
In the absence of any technology,
poor teaching causes outstanding results to drop by more than 50 per cent against those of excellent teaching.
So are the new evaluations — many of which incorporate test scores or other measures of student learning — any better at
identifying poor teaching?
Some schools have problems with weak leadership and
poor teaching especially for the struggling pupils, and this is a much worse problem than having a large school.
They teach the correct technique the first time so you wont pick up any bad habits or
poor teaching form.
As you probably know by now, there will be a teacher workday that day due to the high number, over 1,000, of DPS teachers taking the day off to protest what they consider to be
poor teaching conditions in the system.
In a snapshot of training providers for the TDA, CUREE found only 1 % of the courses were effective at transforming
poor teaching in to better practice.
And it turns out that, even after policies were changed, principals still were not sure
what poor teaching looked like, still did not want to upset their staffs, and still did not think giving a negative evaluation was worth the ensuing tension and hassle — especially given contractual complications and doubts that superintendents would back up personnel actions against low - rated teachers.
As Kraft and a colleague observed, even years after policies were changed, principals remained unsure what
poor teaching looked like, didn't want to upset their staffs, and didn't think giving a negative evaluation was worth the hassle.
Poor teaching resulted in «unacceptable behaviour from pupils» which went unchallenged, while assessment was «disjointed and incoherent», while staff were not held accountable for pupil outcomes.
One professor told the regents» Committee on Educational Policy that «the disaster area is at the junior high school» and
blamed poor teaching and a shortage of counseling services at this level for the substandard skills of entering freshmen.
Poor teaching quality undermines the very raison d'être of sending children to school in the first place.
We don't allow that kind of truancy, so it's not clear why we should put up with
such poor teaching.
Similarly, a well - prepared teacher may perform poorly when asked to teach outside the field of his or her preparation or
under poor teaching conditions — for example, without adequate teaching materials, in substandard space, with too little time, or with classes that are far too large.
parents» views about the quality of teaching, whether they feel their children are challenged sufficiently and how quickly leaders tackle poor teaching
«Technology can amplify great teaching but great technology can not
replace poor teaching,» Andreas Schleicher, Director of the organisation's Directorate for Education and Skills said, and added the reality in schools «lags considerably behind the promise of technology».
The report, published today, claims widespread weaknesses exist in the quality of provision for children with special educational needs in England, with many pupils put into the category because
of poor teaching.
Additionally, as we often do with vexing issues, we've turned to technology — tablets for kids, computer - aided instruction, online instruction — as a way to compensate
for poor teaching (and in some cases an absence of teachers).
Two thirds of the teachers who leave exit for reasons other than retirement, including lack of adequate preparation and mentoring, pressures of test - based accountability, lack of administrative supports, low salaries, and
poor teaching conditions.
Such a simple message from Jesus hidden by history and
poor teaching.
But if that exhausts its function,
poor teaching is taking place.
Dear Abby: You were right on to say that the husband shouldn't punish his children for what amounts to their mother's
poor teaching or example.
The report suggested that this over identification was actually due to
poor teaching and with better teachers many of these pupils would no longer be on SEN lists.
In real life, honestly, we would call
this poor teaching.
The sharing sessions also exposed many examples of how digital technology can leverage great teaching, even if it will never make up for
poor teaching.
Are some students identified as LD simply the victims of
poor teaching?
In contrast, trial and error learning or
poor teaching are less effective and take longer.
Policy makers interpreted low performance as low expectations,
poor teaching, and a lack of urgency.
I think you might have met a few teachers that fit the description of what someone might define as poor and you like to throw out the quantifying adjectives to make it sound like
poor teaching is running rampid.
It sometimes appears that we in the international education community have applied that maxim to the pervasive problem of
poor teaching.
My wife and I were there to make up for a year of
poor teaching — we were the insulating material.
Sometimes I wonder which event is rarest, a tenured teacher being terminated for
poor teaching, a teacher being struck by lightning, or an underperforming California Charter School having its Charter actually revoked by the CDE.
But it also means refusing to turn a blind eye to
poor teaching.
Explore personal, community, and school system issues, including family dysfunction, disability,
poor teaching, punitive discipline, and absence of differentiated instruction.
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development said in a 2015 report that heavy users of computers in the classroom «do a lot worse in most learning outcomes» and that: «In the end, technology can amplify great teaching, but great technology can not replace
poor teaching.»