Sentences with phrase «poorer areas big»

Not exact matches

I grew in a town where the big local church spent huge amounts on «foreign missions», but would not assist with any services for the poor across town or in nearby rural areas.

I'd be happy to be proved wrong however Theo has a very poor injury record, if he is a striker than he hasn't been replaced in the wide area and he has big issues in general as of now on the lone striker role

There has recently been a big scandal over very poor care at hospitals in one particular area, unrelated to maternity care, that had many of the similar features of the FGH disaster, including the implication of the, then, Government's latest vanity project, the «Foundation Trust» scheme:

Hip hop, funk, and retro are all styles that began in what would be considered poorer areas of big American cities.

I dressed George in his material comfortable tracksuit which seems the obvious choice if you are in a play area but no no... my poor little child had the shock of his life as he went down his first big slide at record speed and very nearly ended up in the ball pool across the way.

The biggest shares of foundation aid go to school systems in New York City and other urban and poor suburban areas.

It hits the poorest Brits twice as hard as the rich, according to the Office for National Statistics, and is crushing small businesses, especially in areas outside big cities, where firms have no real access to public transport.

The biggest cause of bad breath that originates in areas other than the mouth is poor digestion of foods.

Four - in - ten children not «school ready» by time they start primary in some areas Some of biggest gaps between poorer and wealthier pupils in affluent areas School readiness gap explains 40 % of

That's a big jump up from the Fs that North Carolina once garnered in this category during the 2000s — but that B grade only comes as a result of the state's recent move to slash funding for the wealthy districts and keeping funding levels for poorer areas stagnant.

Teachers must be paid to move to areas with failing schools because poor quality education is England's biggest barrier to social mobility, David Cameron's inequality tsar has said.

He found in this piece of research that children from prosperous families in Kent (the biggest area for selective schools in England) are more likely to get into grammar schools and also that in selective areas, poorer children overall get relatively worse GCSE results than they do in comprehensive areas.

And the situation is especially bad in areas that need charters the most: our big cities, which serve primarily poor and minority families.

«Small rural communities found they had much in common with big urban areas and poorer suburban communities.»

The report is the Governor will «increase per - pupil funding for charter schools from $ 9,400 to $ 12,000» and that at least $ 1,000 per - pupil would be a transferred directly for the resource poor urban districts to the big - time donor supported charter schools that have recruited students from their area.

Perhaps a bigger drop would be seen in poorer reception areas.

We are living in interesting times; in the long run, the development of the poorer areas of the world will be a big plus, particularly for US agriculture and resource extraction industries, but there will be bumps along the way.

Since I live in a fairly poor area I think it would still be a big deal to most people here.

Just a week ago, about 50 earthquake and social scientists from around the world came to Kathmandu, Nepal, to figure out how to get this poor, congested, overdeveloped, shoddily built area to prepare better for the big one, a repeat of the 1934 temblor that leveled this city.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Solar lanterns are already making some headway in India's poorest areas, and a new study suggests they could be a bigger part of the effort to reduce fossil fuel use while improving lives.

The biggest obstacle that out - of - area investors cite as why they do not purchase property is the fear of poor property management.