Certain that an uneducated tea server from
the poorest class of society could never successfully answer so many questions without cheating, local authorities try to beat Jamal into a confession.
Not exact matches
There are many in
society from all
classes who are lazy, make
poor choices, and live a life that is the direct result
of those choices.
Still, people like this author clamor for more bureaucracy as a defense
of the rest
of society, the middle
class and the
poor.
But it is also held that globalization has brought in its wake, great inequities, mass impoverishment and despair, that it has fractured
society along the existing fault lines
of class, gender and community, while almost irreversibly widening the gap between rich and
poor nations, that it has caused the flow
of currencies across international borders, which has been responsible for financial and economic crises in many countries and regions, including the current Asian financial crisis, that it has enriched a small minority
of persons and corporations within nations and within the international system, marginalizing and violating the basic human rights
of millions
of workers, peasants and farmers and indigenous communities.
An Untouchable had no chance
of becoming a Brahmin, and a member
of the lower feudal orders had few opportunities to make it into the aristocracy, but the
poor in a
class society have at least a reasonable chance
of making it into the middle
class and some middle -
class individuals do make it into the ranks
of the rich.
Titled «The Basic Viewpoint and Policy on the Religious Question During Our Country's Socialist Period,» it reasserts the standard Marxist view
of religion as a response to the human fear
of the terrors
of nature — a response manipulated by
class societies to rationalize the power
of the upper
classes and justify the plight
of workers and the
poor.
This encourages the growth
of a new two -
class society — the information - rich and the information -
poor.
A
class solidarity
of the
poor in pure form has not been sustained in traditional Asian
societies for various reasons.
A
society in which married couples are expected to be faithful to their marital vows «for better or worse, for richer or
poorer, in sickness and in health» is a
society that assumes all people, regardless
of class, can experience marriage as a «school
of love»» no matter what economic hardships may confront them.
This seems surprising when one looks at the statistics — after all, the developing middle
class, an indicator
of a more urban and modernizing
society, is still a minority (perhaps 300 million
of China's 1.3 billion population), albeit a fast - growing one, and China remains a very
poor country in terms
of per capita GDP, as well as substantially rural.
Truth is many on the left, both professionally in the party and socially via the vote, supported section 28, believe homosexual practice to be wrong, thinks the EU erodes their freedom not enhances it, and finds state - funded baby - killing to be a
poor indicator
of a supposedly «civilised»
society: whatever the middle -
class metropolitan «progressives» might sneeringly say.
What does «middle
class» mean in this context in the US and why don't Americans also hear this as a callous disregard for the
poorest sections
of society?
The Council tax really digs into the incomes
of the
poorest earners in
society, but at least the Lib Dems where shielded from making a decision that would had the potential to them unpopular among the middle
classes.
«It punishes the
poor for being
poor, it punishes the middle
class for living in a
society that does not protect them and it rewards those who already have it made by either growing up white, growing rich, or growing up in a state that protects only those who are in the top quintile or in some cases the top one percent
of income earners.»
The question is, why did they choose to spend such vast sums on extending targeted services to the middle
class, while making such severe cuts to the welfare
of the
poorest in our
society?
The Green Party and I are running on a progressive agenda
of helping the
poor and the middle
class gain democratic control
of society so that we can equitably distribute the wealth that is being produced, and to stop the plutocracies
of this nation and world from exploiting Earth's resources anymore than they already have.
Recent adjustments in the
class structure
of Russian
society led to shrinking
of the middle
class and increase
of the
poor.
Winning the race isn't for money or fame, but for the young men to prove to themselves, and all others who doubt them, that they are worth something — they shouldn't be written off by
society just because they are the sons
of poor working
class parents.
There's truth in the lament, voiced from both left and right, that American
society is separating into haves and have - nots; the prospects
of upward mobility are dimming both for the
poorest and for those in what we've traditionally called the «working
class.»
The powers and convenience conferred on
poor, working -
class, and middle -
class individuals by participation in a majority fossil fueled energy system are great in comparison to the existence
of those in «Dickensian» early industrial
society and in comparison to those in underdeveloped
societies currently.
ASSOCHAM has suggested the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority to monitor private insurance companies that may overlook the
poor or weak sections
of the
society by focusing on the rich and upper
class consumers.
The Objective
of Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Bima Yojana (PMJJBY) is to make the insurance policies affordable to the
poor and middle -
class sections
of the
society who are unable to avail life insurance policies (especially health / accidental) due to high insurance premiums.