For a premium phone line, it has some of
the poorest signal to noise and distortion performance we've yet tested.
Of course it should be said that climate prediction science is quite different from weather prediction although
a poor signal to noise ratio is evident in both.
Not exact matches
Nonetheless, even if the substantial recent trend in the AO pattern is simply a product of natural multidecadal variability in North Atlantic climate, it underscores the fact that western and southern Greenland is an extremely
poor place
to look, from a
signal vs.
noise point of view, for the large - scale polar amplification signature of anthropogenic surface warming.
The aim of my post is: with
poor resolution data (temporal
noise due
to multi-year oscillations, geographical
noise from local ocean level increases / decreases etc.) any claim of a clear
signal is dubious.
Nonetheless, even if the substantial recent trend in the AO pattern is simply a product of natural multidecadal variability in North Atlantic climate, it underscores the fact that western and southern Greenland is an extremely
poor place
to look, from a
signal vs.
noise point of view, for the large - scale polar amplification signature of anthropogenic surface warming.
You will still SEE an increase in temperatures, but because of the
poor localisation the variability is much higher and the effect of small - scale (compared
to global) forcings that affect only the region you have measurements for mean that
to get the
signal from the
noise requires more time.