And if your experience was anything like mine, you'll recall brilliant creative highs punctuated by long tedious slogs sorting through obscure and
poorly documented data formats, unless you were really unlucky and reduced to directly hacking binary files themselves.
Many places refuse to turn over climate
data, BEST adjusted and cherry picked much of the
data they used, Coastal areas appear to be heavily effected by coastal winds that are likely very very
poorly documented, Non-coastal wind effected areas seem to have little to no warming, «Free» / online unadjusted
data appears to be mostly at or near satellite
data start thus provides little extra info about the past, Looking for help from anyone who has Europe based original
data outside of the «taxpayer funded yet refuse to turn over
data to the public / taxpayer groups».
It is interesting, however, that USHCN and NOAA
documents and scientists, like the poster here at CA, Lee, make numerous references to quality control as that process for (attempting) extractions of valid
data from
poorly obtained collections.