The estimated
population size assumes that only 50 % of the interior population was trapped in a given year.
Not exact matches
«These
populations look the same — they have similar plumage and are similar in
size and shape — but
assuming that
populations that sing differently tend not to interbreed, this means that species - level diversity in the Neotropics is underestimated.»
Estimates of current and ancestral
population sizes (Ne1 = 1,600,000; Ne2 = 780,000; Nancestral = 470,000), divergence time (1,800,000 years and
assuming a generation time of 1 year), and gene flow (2Nm1autosomal = 1.69; 2Nm2autosomal = 0.83; 2Nm1X - chromosome = 0.38; 2Nm2X - chromosome = 0.26) were obtained from previous studies and inferred using an Isolation - with - Migration model [21], [26].
We first estimate the statistical relationship between the
size of the Catholic
population in 1900 and the extent of private schooling today in order to capture only that share of the private sector's
size that can be attributed to 19th - century Catholic policies — policies we
assume to be otherwise unrelated to contemporary student achievement.
The simulation spans a period of 12 months and
assumes that the fund had 30 investors; in this case, the sample
size is the entire
population.
In journal article after journal article, and book after book, I found cat - predation studies that were flawed by small sample
size, samples that were not shown to be typical, unjustified generalizations, a failure to account for confounding factors, and a tendency to
assume that predation of individual birds necessarily resulted in damage to bird
populations at the species level.
Therefore, why not
assume that the goal is minimization of
population size?
I'm
assuming we are talking about optimal
population size for millenia.
If you
assume that there are 100,000 climate scientists in the world (there's not that many, but it's a convenient number that makes a critical point), that the results are accurate to 4 % as per the STATS page you link to, and that the
population size is 489 (as per the STATS survey), the confidence level is 98.44 %.
Of course, all of this
assuming — from the assumption that our
population of readers is a true representation of the whole
population and on to the assumption that each day's crop of kids is the same
size — has to produce wobbly results.