The guidance document, released Nov. 10, includes sample questions for peer reviewers as they examine a state's ability to assess and disseminate results for
populations of disadvantaged children...
Not exact matches
A larger percentage
of such births are to
children in
disadvantaged / poor / broken households, who then often get poorer and less adequate educations than the general
population does.
The sample was stratified by country and electoral ward type to over-represent families in Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, and wards with a high proportion
of disadvantaged and ethnic minority families.19 Electoral wards were defined as ethnic minority (at least 30 %
of population «Black» or «Asian», 1991 census), with the remainder defined as
disadvantaged (upper quartile
Child Poverty Index20) or advantaged (not in upper quartile
Child Poverty Index).
The
Child - to - Child Trust has pioneered, tested, and promoted a range of practical and effective «child - to - child» approaches to facilitate the participation of the most marginalized and disadvantaged populations of chil
Child - to -
Child Trust has pioneered, tested, and promoted a range of practical and effective «child - to - child» approaches to facilitate the participation of the most marginalized and disadvantaged populations of chil
Child Trust has pioneered, tested, and promoted a range
of practical and effective «
child - to - child» approaches to facilitate the participation of the most marginalized and disadvantaged populations of chil
child - to -
child» approaches to facilitate the participation of the most marginalized and disadvantaged populations of chil
child» approaches to facilitate the participation
of the most marginalized and
disadvantaged populations of children.
In 2013 - 14, according to the United Way, «almost 60 percent
of the student
population came from economically
disadvantaged homes, and nearly 70 percent were considered high needs students — an inequity that made it exceptionally difficult for many
children to thrive.»
One proposal comes from the Education Trust, which has a 17 - year track record
of commitment to school reform.The Ed Trust proposes that parents
of children in Title I schools, those that have a
disadvantaged population and are the main recipients
of federal funds, be vested with a private right
of action «to enforce their rights under the law.»
Better measures
of economic
disadvantage can help us better understand the variation in outcomes within the
population of children who are eligible for subsidized meals
These
populations include
children who have limited English language experiences, economic
disadvantages, educational
disadvantages, disabilities, or factors that make it difficult to demonstrate potential on traditional identification measures
of talented and gifted.
WHEREAS, the NAACP recognizes that at best, quality charter schools serve only a small percentage
of children of color and
disadvantaged students for whom the NAACP advocates relative to said
population left behind in failing schools; and
Combs values education, boasts about his
children's grades and believes deeply that there are thousands and thousands
of students from struggling and
disadvantaged populations who are smart and can achieve great things.
61 %
of the diverse student
population are
children who come from economically
disadvantaged families.
ESEA, Title I, Improving the Academic Achievement
of the
Disadvantaged $ 14.4 Billion Funding based on the
population of children living below the federal poverty level (FPL) and the state expenditure per pupil.
If we do not test every
child in every grade, then historically
disadvantaged populations will be allowed to sink even further and the promise
of equal opportunity will be lost.
In 2017, 91 percent, or 336
of the 371 schools in Texas with failing marks from the TEA serve
populations with more than 60 percent economically
disadvantaged children.
Purpose Prep, a school in its third year
of existence with a student
population comprised
of 98 % students
of color, 74 % economically
disadvantaged and nearly every
child is reading at or above grade level.
Aboriginal Australians experience multiple social and health
disadvantages from the prenatal period onwards.1 Infant2 and child3 mortality rates are higher among Aboriginal
children, as are well - established influences on poor health, cognitive and education outcomes, 4 — 6 including premature birth and low birth weight, 7 — 9 being born to teenage mothers7 and socioeconomic
disadvantage.1, 8 Addressing Aboriginal early life
disadvantage is
of particular importance because
of the high birth rate among Aboriginal people10 and subsequent young age structure
of the Aboriginal
population.11 Recent
population estimates suggest that
children under 10 years
of age account for almost a quarter
of the Aboriginal
population compared with only 12 %
of the non-Aboriginal
population of Australia.11
Area - level explanatory variables will include: accessibility and remoteness, as measured by the Accessibility / Remoteness Index
of Australia Plus (ARIA +); 54 socioeconomic
disadvantage, as measured by the Australian Bureau
of Statistics (ABS) Socioeconomic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA); 55 presence
of Aboriginal Medical Services; presence
of an AMIHS; proportion
of Aboriginal pregnancies / births in an area managed by an AMIHS; numbers
of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal
children attending preschool; numbers
of full - time equivalent health workers (including general medical practitioners, nurses, midwives and Aboriginal health workers) per 10 000
population; measures
of social capital from the NSW
Population Health Survey; 56 features
of local communities (derived from ABS Census data), such as information on median personal and household income, mortgage repayment and rent; average number
of persons per bedroom and household size; employment; non-school qualifications and housing type for Aboriginal residents in each area.57
Effects
of responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions on
children's development and growth at age 4 years in a
disadvantaged population in Pakistan: a longitudinal follow - up
of a cluster - randomised factorial effectiveness trial.
The higher - than -
population normal levels
of psychological distress found among families
of children with ID might therefore be attributable to pre-existing socioeconomic
disadvantage (the distal cause), rather than
child ID per se.
The project will extend the evidence on the efficacy
of the intervention from two previous randomized efficacy trials
of the KITS Program with special needs
populations to examine the impacts
of the intervention on the broader
population of children from
disadvantaged backgrounds in general education.
These variables were selected based on the literature indicating that more frequent use
of outpatient services is associated with better health in
children from
disadvantaged and other at - risk
populations, while frequent use
of the ER and hospitalizations are associated with poorer health.
Other measures
of general health, such as
children's nutritional status, would also be interesting, especially among economically
disadvantaged populations.
This confirms the idea that when affordability is attained across the
population through universal health insurance, multiple factors such as parenting, parent's mental health, neighborhood characteristics, parent's background in terms
of disadvantage, and other established risk factors continue to play a role in determining patterns
of health care for
children.