As per my understanding, buying more quantity of an expensively valued long - term compounder should also be judged in terms of individual
portfolio allocation strategy of an investor.
My key questions then are: is the first - order benefit gained from applying McClung's drawdown and
portfolio allocation strategy rather than annual rebalancing to fixed asset proportions; and is modifying a globally diversified market cap portfolio to a Triad (or similar) portfolio necessary to benefit from McClung's strategy or is the global cap portfolio likely to be adequate and the required changes only offer second - order benefits?
In their April 2016 paper entitled «Protective Asset Allocation (PAA): A Simple Momentum - Based Alternative for Term Deposits», Wouter Keller and Jan Willem Keuning examine a multi-class, dual -
momentum portfolio allocation strategy with crash protection based on multi-market breadth.
Yesterday I detailed a paired switching
portfolio allocation strategy using SPY (SPDR S&P 500) and TLT (iShares Barclays 20 Year Treasury Fund) and offered back test results dating to 2003.
RobCast: Nine Valuation - Informed - Indexing Portfolio Allocation Strategies
For those sticking to
your portfolio allocation strategy based on age, ages 0 — 30 have ample opportunity to allocate capital to individual securities.
To potentially manage downside risk in a relatively uncertain market environment, we believe investors must avoid complacency and should reevaluate
their portfolio allocation strategy.
Juicy Excerpt # 4: Rob Bennett in his podcast «RobCast # 137, Nine VII
Portfolio Allocation Strategies,» indicates some preference for his high - medium - low strategy, which would be 60 % stocks in the baseline, but would switch to 30 % stocks when the PE10 ratio moves above 21, and would switch to 90 % stocks when the PE10 ratio moves below 12.