They may be a smaller percent of
your portfolio than you desire and there is a good chance they are a better bargain at the lower price.
Not exact matches
In other words, focus on keeping your
portfolio balanced between your
desired mix of stocks and bonds, rather
than which stocks and bonds to choose.
There's also an academic Modern
Portfolio Theory explanation for why you should diversify among risky assets (aka stocks), something like: for a given desired risk / return ratio, it's better to leverage up a diverse portfolio than to use a non-diverse portfolio, because risk that can be eliminated through diversification is not compensated by increased
Portfolio Theory explanation for why you should diversify among risky assets (aka stocks), something like: for a given
desired risk / return ratio, it's better to leverage up a diverse
portfolio than to use a non-diverse portfolio, because risk that can be eliminated through diversification is not compensated by increased
portfolio than to use a non-diverse
portfolio, because risk that can be eliminated through diversification is not compensated by increased
portfolio, because risk that can be eliminated through diversification is not compensated by increased returns.
Obviously we would
desire the highest possible income growth, but even a 7 % yearly
portfolio «salary raise» should be more
than sufficient to outpace inflation over time.
Generally, the two scenarios in which there are significant cost savings are: 1) When implementing the
desired allocation at the account level (rather
than at the
portfolio level) results in using high - cost funds, and 2) When implementing the
desired allocation at the account level (rather
than at the
portfolio level) results in using tax - inefficient funds in a taxable account.
To rebalance your
portfolio, you would buy more of the asset class that's lower
than desired, possibly using some of the proceeds of the asset class that is now larger
than you intended.
Similarly, an investor with a very low risk tolerance that has the financial capacity for some risk and
desire for better returns may be better suited for a
portfolio that entails more risk
than the client's risk tolerance would indicate.
It is back, better
than ever and the idea for this trackball innovation was inspired by our users, who invented creative ways to achieve their
desired level of comfort, sometimes adding additional wedges under their trackball for elevated angles,» said Anatoliy Polyanker, global
portfolio and