Interestingly, on that same day, ABC (with several other organizations as signatories) issued a letter (PDF) to Department of Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, urging «swift action to address the threat to wildlife populations and human health
posed by feral cats.»
But advocates don't have to make their case by brushing off the environmental risks
posed by feral cats, as if they're a mostly harmless addition to the landscape.
«Because western society's orientations toward wildlife is becoming more moralistic and less utilitarian,» explain the authors of a study recently published online in PLoS ONE, «conservation biologists must develop innovative and collaborative ways to address the threats
posed by feral cats rather than assuming wholesale removal of feral cats through euthanasia is a universally viable solution.»
The authors conclude that bird conservation professionals must develop innovative and collaborative ways to address threats
posed by feral cats instead of advocating for euthanasia in all situations (Peterson et al., 2012).
In addition to advocating for responsible pet ownership, we also oppose Trap, Neuter, Release (TNR) for feral cats because of the persistent and severe threats
posed by feral cat colonies.
In the past decade or two, the threat
posed by the feral cat has forced scientists and researchers to radically rewrite Australia's ecological story.
Not exact matches
Our action plan calls for a public - awareness campaign encouraging responsible
cat ownership
by showing the impact
feral and free - ranging
cats pose to native wildlife.
Instead, it opted for a low - key approach of meeting with the
cat - colony supporters and
cat owners in a public relations campaign «focusing on responsible
cat ownership and the impact on native wildlife
posed by feral and free - ranging
cats.»
Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that
cats are rarely a source of disease, and that it is unlikely for anyone to get sick from touching or owning a
cat.3 «
Feral cats pose even less risk to public health than pet
cats because they have minimal human contact, and any contact that does occur is almost always initiated
by the person,» says Ackerman.
If ABC is truly concerned about the public health threat
posed by «
feral cat colonies,» why withhold such critical information?
Consequently, many conservation initiatives have been aimed at the eradication of
feral cats on islands (Nogales et al. 2004), but the threat that free - ranging house
cats pose to wildlife is also serious and has gained recognition
by both researchers and conservationists (e.g., Kays and DeWan 2004; Baker et al. 2005; Sims et al. 2008; Morgan et al. 2009; Bonnington et al. 2013).
(2) Due to the large number of stray and abandoned
cats, euthanasia is not a cost effective, acceptable or ethical solution to the threats to public health and safety
posed by large populations of stray,
feral or homeless
cats.
While it's true that
feral cats do
pose a threat to endangered birds, the bigger threat comes from a disasterous loss of habitat caused
by indiscriminate development.