So, all in all, I'm pretty confident in
my position as an atheist, whereas some conservative Christians probably are being disobedient to this law, right?
~ The Superior Atheist believes that
its position as an atheist grants it an intellectual superiority above all others.
Thanks for the essay, Casile I've been following your dad's blog for several months now, and from my own
position as an atheist, I have appreciated the honest questioning and exploration of many aspects of religion.
Not exact matches
If you stop looking at it
as good vs. evil, and start looking at it
as right vs. wrong it becomes a lot easier to understand the
atheist's
position.
There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When
atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic
positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (
as far
as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in
atheists» atrocities.
In his recent book God and the New Atheism, the Georgetown theologian John Haught has usefully captured this quasi-religious absolutism among the New
Atheists by summarizing their
position as a seven - point «creed»:
Or perhaps I simply realize that many of the so called rational
atheists who post on CNN are dedicated to reason only
as long
as it supports their
positions and when it doesn't immediately switch to ad hominem attacks to try to get people to ignore the legitimate point that was made.
An
atheist will find that
position ridiculous, since an
atheist will find
position A to be false (creating the false cause you note),
as would someone who perhaps doesn't hold to the classical Western Christian cosmology, but it is possible for Santorum to hold to A and not - B.
Why do you
atheists, who hold science up
as a god, hold so many
positions that science rejects?
The point is not trying to force people to believe the same
as the
atheist; the point is to respect all people, allow them to live
as they believe best, and do not allow people in
positions of power or government to force their religious beliefs upon others.
midwest rail I am puzzled
as to why
atheists or non believers call it a lie when a Christian takes an unlikely but not ruled out
position that is contrary to mainstream scientific consensus.
«To
atheists, I make an especially avid plea to reconsider their own
position as well.
Now, while this does not directly demonstrate the existence of God, it does open up a whole world beyond the material universe and so it makes the average
atheist refreshingly ner vous that his own
position is nothing like
as secure
as he, misguidedly, tends to think it is.
Now if
atheists proclaimed «there is no god»
as a factual statement (which some do) you would be right... but that isn't the
position all, or even most, take.
Well, Christians are just
as abusive towards
atheists, and there is no calling out from other Christians... I think that says more about the nature of the anonymous internet and which
position one holds, than anything.
Oh gosh, why would becoming an
atheist, even temporarily, ever jeopardize your
position as a pastor or seminary lecturer?
Yes David religion of atheism
as some have used the legal definition of religion in law suits in favour of an
atheist position.
Instead, too many
atheists simply regurgitate the «official»
atheist position (ironic, given that this is what they accuse believers of doing vis - a-vis the Bible...), not only without having read the book recently enough to cite it accurately, but also not taking into account the most recent arguments supporting or undermining — not only by believers, but by
atheist scientists
as well.
Science (like
Atheists) forgets they are limited by their own perspective, their literal physical
position as a human being here on Earth.
I tend to fall on the side of
Atheist as I find it easeir to believe there is no God...
as opposed to your
position of... there is a God and it is the one I believe in and not those other guys.
Oh, and I'm an
atheist from the point of view that i do not believe that a god or gods exist, but i do not say — nor do i take the
position — that there is no god or gods,
as it is within the realm of possibility.
@Mike: From Smurfettes post... «Oh, and I'm an
atheist from the point of view that i do not believe that a god or gods exist, but i do not say — nor do i take the
position — that there is no god or gods,
as it is within the realm of possibility.»
The only way you can not see what monk said
as being a straw man argument is if you consider his representation of the
atheists position an accurate one.
The leaders you brand «
atheist» are more aptly labelled «authotheists»
as they put themselves into the Godhead
position.
Theists view agnostics
as atheists, while
atheists view them
as theists (how could anyone fail to see that the
atheist position is the only scientific one?).