One possible reason for the differing results is that real people move more during a crash and are prone to be out of position at the start, compared with relatively stiff and precisely
positioned crash test dummies.
Not exact matches
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the
crash test indicates that the passenger's survival space was maintained very well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the
crash test indicates that the passenger's survival space was maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well in the Institute's
test.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space wasn't maintained well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well (Institute
test car shown).
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well (Institute
test vehicle shown).
Aside from the intruded door frame when the door hinges were sheared off in the second
test (shown), the
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the
crash test indicates that the passenger's survival space was maintained very well (Institute
test car shown).
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the first
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well.
The newly introduced side - pole
crash test exclusively uses the small female
crash dummy in a front seating
position.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the
crash test indicates that the passenger's survival space was maintained well.
The side - barrier
crash test now implements a combination of male and female
crash test dummies, with the male
positioned in a front seating
position (as before) and the small female (new) in a rear seating
position.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the second
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the
crash test indicates that the passenger's survival space was maintained well (Institute
test car shown).
Despite some buckling of the A-pillar and roof rail, the
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates the driver's upper survival space was maintained well, but there was more footwell intrusion than is desirable.
The driver's survival space was maintained well, as indicated by the
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the second
crash test.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained extremely well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates the driver's survival space wasn't maintained well (second
test with front and side curtain airbag deployment).
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the
crash test, together with the footwell intrusion, indicates that the driver's survival space wasn't maintained well (first
test shown).
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the second
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well (intrusion pattern in first
test appeared very similar).
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after both
crash tests indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well (second
test shown).
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test, together with the footwell intrusion, indicate that the driver space wasn't maintained well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver space was maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was severely compromised.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.
The driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well, as indicated by the
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the third
crash test.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the first
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well.
By looking at
crash tests using different
dummy positions, the effect of optimising occupants» seating
position before the start of the impact could then be determined.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well, despite some buckling of the A-pillar.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the
crash test indicates that the passenger's survival space was not maintained well.
The
dummy's
position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well in the second
test.
The driver's survival space was maintained well, as indicated by the
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the third
crash test.
IIHS requests reconsideration of agency's denial of Institute's initial petition (September 5, 2002) concerning
dummy seating
positions in
tests for occupant
crash protection
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after all three
crash tests indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well (third
test shown).
The
dummy's
position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the
crash test indicates the driver's survival space was maintained well.