What was once suspected — that elected officials could their trade policy
positions for campaign contributions — has become more and more openly discussed.
Not exact matches
In some cases, evidence of past incorrect opinion is sufficient: The CEO of the software firm Mozilla, Brendan Eich, was hounded from his post in 2014
for a $ 1,000
contribution to a 2008 California referendum
campaign against gay marriage, evidence of a
position he shared at the time with Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
According to New York law, state - level
campaign contributions can be used
for «any lawful purpose,» but they «shall not be converted by any person to a personal use which is unrelated to a political
campaign or the holding of a public office or party
position.»
The report cited a 2013 legislative proposal by Cuomo that
campaign contributions should be used only
for a purpose «directly related to promoting the nomination or election of a candidate or the execution of duties associated with the holding of a public office or party
position.»
She criticizes Maragos
for his past
positions as a Republican against abortion and same - sex marriage and
for taking
campaign contributions from county vendors when he ran
for comptroller.
An executive order signed last week will require chaplains to be active clergy members and also live in Westchester County comes as a response to a federal probe into whether or not former County Executive Rob Astorino, a Republican, offered up a chaplain
position in exchange
for campaign contributions.
The candidates selected will need to take a
position on hard issues, like the five outlined at reform.to, which provide concrete plans to create a small donor system
for campaign financing: matching citizen
contributions and providing voters with vouchers.
It would bar the mayor and department heads from holding
positions in any political party or soliciting subordinates
for campaign contributions for anyone running
for a city office.
«That's why you have big
campaign contributions and you get the temptation
for the people within government to take advantage of their
positions of power.»
On his questionnaire, Astorino refused to take a
position on lowering
campaign contribution limits
for legislative and statewide candidates.
However, in 1999, the FEC reversed its
position and decided that LLCs should be treated either as a corporation or a partnership
for the purposes of
campaign contribution limits — but not the limits set
for human beings.
The governor went so as far as to circulate a questionnaire to candidates quizzing them on their support
for ethics law changes, asking their
position on limiting lawmakers» outside income and stricter
campaign contribution requirements
for Limited Liability Companies (LLCs).