Imago relationship therapy: focusing on such skills as constructive couples dialogue, anger / rage containment and
positive anger expression, re-romanticizing, and passion enhancement.
Not exact matches
However, an intervening nap blocked and even reversed this negative emotional reactivity to
anger and fear while conversely enhancing ratings of
positive (happy)
expressions.
We assessed mood and emotion regulation with the following measures:
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), 22 the Differential Emotions Scale (DES), 23 the Aggression scale, 24 and the State - Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI - 2).25 The PANAS yields 2 factors: positive affect and negative affect, with good reliability in our sample (positive affect α = 0.81 and 0.89; negative affect α = 0.84 an
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), 22 the Differential Emotions Scale (DES), 23 the Aggression scale, 24 and the State - Trait
Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI - 2).25 The PANAS yields 2 factors:
positive affect and negative affect, with good reliability in our sample (positive affect α = 0.81 and 0.89; negative affect α = 0.84 an
positive affect and negative affect, with good reliability in our sample (
positive affect α = 0.81 and 0.89; negative affect α = 0.84 an
positive affect α = 0.81 and 0.89; negative affect α = 0.84 and 0.87).
The objective is to equip low - income couples with relationship skills to improve couple interaction by reducing negative exchanges (
anger, criticism, contempt, and blaming) and strengthening
positive behaviors (
expressions of support, humor, empathy, and affection).
Further, bullying was positively associated with
positive attitudes towards bullying and
anger expression and neither of these associations were moderated by the level of victimization.
Results showed that accurate recognition of facial
expressions of negative emotions (
anger, contempt, disgust, fear, and sadness) predicted less conflict engaging behaviors during conflict with their romantic partners (but not
positive problem solving and withdrawal), which in turn predicted greater relationship satisfaction.
Five 7 - point rating scales were used: supportive presence (i.e.,
expression of
positive regard and emotional support to the child), hostility (i.e.,
expression of
anger, discounting, rejecting or blaming the child), intrusiveness (i.e., interfering with the child's needs, interests and behaviors), clarity of instruction (i.e., structuring, timely hints and adequate pace of instruction), and confidence (i.e.,
expression of confidence in the child's ability to fulfill the task).