Sentences with phrase «positive global effect»

«Grindsted is our largest emulsifier production facility and ships to an international customer base, so the sustainability benefit accruing for our customers is expected to have a positive global effect.»

Not exact matches

The global liquidity that is returning to the region is having a positive effect on financial markets, says Gary Dugan, chief investment officer, private banking, at Emirates NBD, based in Dubai.

But no sooner had China's industrial base started to show some positive effects from the pickup in global commodity prices — which has allowed its factories to push through some price increases after many years of producer price deflation — than several of the industrial materials most reliant on Chinese demand started to come under pressure during April.

Despite concerns about higher tariff proposals, we think negotiations should limit their effects, and our fundamental outlook for global growth remains positive.

Furthermore, according to the report, the fundraising method has positive effects on the network, can target global investors (or donors) in a non-discriminatory manner while providing a fast and easy fundraising mechanism.

Among the positive effects of global economic competition is a chastened realism about the relation between wage increases and increased productivity, and the relation between increased productivity and continuous learning.

Our goal is twofold: Helping people make better food choices by providing delicious healthy options and having a positive effect on our earth and the global community.

«As partners, I urge that we work together to support this effort of the African Union that will have a positive effect on global economic development and integration.»

For example, some experts say repopulating Siberia with mammoth - alikes would refill a niche that would make the ecosystem flourish, and have a positive effect on global warming.

The model explicitly accounts for the effects of temperature and soil moisture changes (positive and negative) on global and regional wheat production fluctuations.

«Global warming could have some positive effects.

However, many effects of global warming are likely to be less positive.

Another positive feedback of global warming is the albedo effect: less white summer ice means more dark open water, which absorbs more heat from the sun.

The research also appears to solve one of the great unknowns of climate sensitivity, the role of cloud formation and whether this will have a positive or negative effect on global warming.

Also, steps you can take to improve local air quality — driving less, using less electricity, turning the thermostat down, etc. — will have the positive side effect of helping mitigate global warming.

We are helping to build a global mindful movement, one that will have positive effects on society long after the event is over.

Global perceived effect scores were higher for the intervention group and 29 of 32 words of descriptive feedback included positive words regarding foam rolling.

We strongly believe that this balanced academic exchange will have a positive, sustainable and long - lasting effect — rewarding Amazon communities and the curious and open - minded Global College student.

But it does seem to comport with a recent meta - analysis of global and U.S. voucher initiatives, by Shakeel, Anderson, and Wolf, showing a prevalent and consistent trend toward early dips in performance followed by year - three and year - four positive effects, in both literacy and mathematics.

Meyers: Our goals include providing a media venue where people from all walks of life can have their voices heard in a safe, commercial - free, child - friendly environment; promoting positive role models; empowering young people to realize their own potential to effect positive change in the world; bridging the digital divide and continuing to enrich this digital media archive with inspiring stories from around the globe; enlisting support from foundations, grants, and government agencies, corporations, and individuals so that this global learning project can continue to grow and provide a freely - accessible, online multi-media resource to educators and students around the world for decades to come.

«The use of Echo360 in our global EMBA program and widely deployed throughout our other programs at LSE has had a positive effect for our students.

Investing in young children is likely to have enormous positive effects on the U.S. economy by increasing economic growth, improving the skills of the workforce, reducing poverty, and strengthening U.S. global competitiveness.

Using Numbers In a Book Title Recently on LinkedIn, J.D. Gershbein, a global speaker and social branding specialist, raised the question, «Does a numbered step approach to titling a book have a positive effect on sales?»

But the global move to capitalism has had positive and negative effects on the US — positive for capital, negative for labor.

According to Global Affairs Canada, «NAFTA has had an overwhelmingly positive effect on the Canadian economy,» and its increased trilateral trade within North American from $ 288 billion in 1993 to more than $ 1 trillion in 2015.

Paul VanDevelder obviously lacks perspective on the global positive effects of PSA screening.

The event also benefits Youth Interactive www.youthinteractive.us, the host organization, which works with at - risk youth in Arts and Entrepreneurship and the umbrella organization Media4Good www.media4good.org, is a global media non-profit which uses film to effect positive change around the world.

The Biorock ® reef system has helped global efforts for the reef restoration due to positive effects on all marine life, eco-tourism and various conservation projects.

The organization encourages the implementation of the Global Code of Ethics for Tourism, with a view to ensuring that member countries, tourist destinations, and businesses maximize the positive economic, social, and cultural effects of tourism and fully reap its benefits, while minimizing its negative social and environmental impacts.

Human induced trend has two components, namely (a) greenhouse effect [this includes global and local / regional component] and (b) non-greenhouse effect [local / regional component]-- according to IPCC (a) is more than half of global average temperature anomaly wherein it also includes component of volcanic activities, etc that comes under greenhouse effect; and (b) contribution is less than half — ecological changes component but this is biased positive side by urban - heat - island effect component as the met network are concentrated in urban areas and rural - cold - island effect is biased negative side as the met stations are sparsely distributed though rural area is more than double to urban area.

This could have enormously (positive) effects on global warming, but it is something politicians can not see.

However both do in fact force global temperature, therefore both could be called forcings and the greenhouse effect of water vapour would then be a positive feedback forcing.

Re 9 wili — I know of a paper suggesting, as I recall, that enhanced «backradiation» (downward radiation reaching the surface emitted by the air / clouds) contributed more to Arctic amplification specifically in the cold part of the year (just to be clear, backradiation should generally increase with any warming (aside from greenhouse feedbacks) and more so with a warming due to an increase in the greenhouse effect (including feedbacks like water vapor and, if positive, clouds, though regional changes in water vapor and clouds can go against the global trend); otherwise it was always my understanding that the albedo feedback was key (while sea ice decreases so far have been more a summer phenomenon (when it would be warmer to begin with), the heat capacity of the sea prevents much temperature response, but there is a greater build up of heat from the albedo feedback, and this is released in the cold part of the year when ice forms later or would have formed or would have been thicker; the seasonal effect of reduced winter snow cover decreasing at those latitudes which still recieve sunlight in the winter would not be so delayed).

Is less poleward transport of heat by the Gulf Stream as the AMOC weakens a positive feedback for global warming, since that energy will escape more slowly in the humid (higher water vapor GHG effect) tropics than near the poles?

This is what I get out of it: the Arctic - ice - albedo situation is more complicated than earlier thought (due to clouds, sun - filled summers, dark winters, etc), but NET EFFECT, the ice loss and all these other related factors (some negative feedbacks) act as a positive feedback and enhance global warming.

The irony is obvious, but there's also the added point that while oil money is behind a lot of the denial, they themselves are ready to jump on the positive — for them — effects of global warming.

And because using biogas for power generation will have a positive effect on global warming, we can feel good about it as well.

d) You could have a positive effect on reducing global GHG emissions if you put your effort into advocating for solutions that are currently too expensive because of ideology, fear - mongering, misinformation, etc — i.e. nuclear energy.

Before it is safe to attribute a global warming or a global cooling effect to any other factor (CO2 in particular) it is necessary to disentangle the simultaneous overlapping positive and negative effects of solar variation, PDO / ENSO and the other oceanic cycles.

It is hardly likely that such a high level of TSI compared to historical levels is going to have no effect at all on global temperature changes and indeed during most of that period there was an enhanced period of positive Pacific Decadal Oscillation that imparted increasing warmth to the atmosphere.

If natural cycles were to cause a «step up» in their positive phase, then they would also cause a «step down» in their negative phase, thus having zero net long - term effect on global temperatures.

However, with the global demand for passengers expected to double over the next 20 years, further steps must be taken to ensure that efficiency gains will have a net positive effect on total emission reductions.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

These proposals, including a potential political compromise, would have a positive effect on access to energy services without any significant impact on global greenhouse gas emissions.

Global warming catastrophists in fact have to argue against historical data, and say it is flawed in two ways: First, they argue there are positive feedbacks in climate that will take hold in the future and accelerate warming; and second, they argue there are other anthropogenic effects, specifically sulphate aerosols, that are masking man - made warming.

Existing climate models with a positive feedback from H2O are plain wrong, since they don't allow the heated water vapour to rise, forming clouds that contribute to global dimming, offsetting CO2 effects on temperature.

Some skeptics ask, «If global warming has a positive feedback effect, then why don't we have runaway warming?

The challenge, now, is for humans to have significant and positive effect on global warming.

In summation, the material presented in this chapter represents overwhelming evidence for a positive effect of global warming on human health.

Although a limited range of positive effects of global warming on humans have been identified, the overwhelming majority of effects are increasingly dangerous.