That, too, is not an easy decision, given that some analytics strategies can generate revenue or
positive publicity if they're sold or marketed.
Not exact matches
This kind of
publicity gets noticed and
if you are the author who created it, it also has long term
positive ramifications as you move ahead in your writing career.
I think that an article on them [Lexis / West], even
if not
positive, just gives their China businesses some much needed
publicity and is thus not good for us independent publishers.
Probably this takedown will generate even more
publicity for Blakes than the original stunt did, most of it relatively
positive, so even
if it's an unforeseen consequence, it will probably end up being a good one.