-LSB-...] NOTE: In Senia Maymin's New Year's Day article, she writes, «Positive Psychology is the study of
positive subjective experiences, positive traits, and positive institutions.»
Not exact matches
Depending on the scope and purpose of the research, happiness is often measured using objective indicators (data on crime, income, civic engagement and health) and
subjective methods, such as asking people how frequently they
experience positive and negative emotions.
On the negative side, no living person had any
subjective experience of death, and on the
positive side, the dead person who appeared and spoke to him in his dreams seemed just as alive as ever.
Now it is exactly in situations like this — according to the standard account of orthodox Whiteheadians — that God is supposed to lure the world, by means of what he proffers to actual occasions via
subjective aims, toward that falling out of events which will make his future
experience most
positive.
From a process point of view, this is to say that God has a
subjective aim towards goodness, variety; and ever - increasing intensity of (rich and
positive forms of)
experience.
Positive emotions, such as happiness, love, gratitude and pride, are more similar both as
subjective experiences and at the level of brain activity.
This lack of explicit protection in combination with the long - standing controversial and
subjective nature of history / social study standards, give states and local districts have the power to either deny these students a
positive, inclusive
experience.
The
Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988; Terracciano et al., 2003) assessed the affective components of subjective well - being by requiring participants to indicate on a 5 - point Likert scale to what extent (1 = very slightly, 5 = extremely) they generally experienced 20 adjectives describing affective states (10 for positive affect and 10 for negative affect) during a specific period («in this moment, today, last week, last month, or generally&
Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988; Terracciano et al., 2003) assessed the affective components of
subjective well - being by requiring participants to indicate on a 5 - point Likert scale to what extent (1 = very slightly, 5 = extremely) they generally
experienced 20 adjectives describing affective states (10 for
positive affect and 10 for negative affect) during a specific period («in this moment, today, last week, last month, or generally&
positive affect and 10 for negative affect) during a specific period («in this moment, today, last week, last month, or generally»).
Finally, our results are consistent with findings of other studies that observed that suppression was used to regulate many negative emotions, such as anger, and to decrease the
subjective experience of
positive emotions (Gross & Levenson, 1997; Gross, 1998).
Positive experience comprised positive emotions and subjective well
Positive experience comprised
positive emotions and subjective well
positive emotions and
subjective well - being.
Measures utilized include the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Spielberger State - Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the
Subjective Units of Disturbance (SUD), the Dissociative
Experiences Scale (DES), Impact of Events Scale (IES), the Modified PTSD (MPTSD) Scale, the Global Severity Index (GSI),
Positive Symptom Distress subscale (PSD), and the Dissociative Interview Schedule (DIS).
We evaluated the association between dismissing attachment and
positive bias in school - aged children's reports of their own emotional
experience and their parental care, hypothesizing that: (1) compared to secure children, dismissing children would underreport their
subjective distress relative to physiological indicators of distress, and (2) dismissing children would report that their parents were warmer / more caring than would secure children.