Of these studies, 11 report
positive test score effects among their primary findings.
Despite the vast majority of randomized control trials (RCTs) of private school choice showing significant,
positive test score effects for at least some subgroups of students, some of those gains have been modest and other effects have been null for at least some subgroups.
Not exact matches
Fariña recently told Capital she believes some charter schools can have a
positive effect on the public system, while knocking others (without naming specific schools) for touting high
test scores, but not accepting special education or English Language Learner students.
«Although some types of school moves can have
positive effects, most are associated with a range of negative outcomes, including lower
test scores, grade retention, low self - esteem, trouble fitting into schools, dropping out and event adult substance abuse.»
The authors found that PLCs have a
positive effect on student learning: student
scores increased in reading, writing, math, science, and social studies subject
tests.
We find the program did not reduce
test scores; likely, it increased them, with
positive effects most pronounced in schools that serve a more disadvantaged student population.
After analysts at the National Center on Performance Incentives (NCPI) reported no
positive effects on student
test scores, the Dallas Morning News declared the program a failure.
Finally, earlier evaluations of these programs found neutral to
positive effects on
test scores.
Nonetheless, they still reveal significantly
positive effects of attending private schools on African - American
test scores.
Commentary on «Great Teaching: Measuring its
effects on students» future earnings» By Raj Chetty, John N. Friedman and Jonah E. Rockoff The new study by Raj Chetty, John Friedman, and Jonah Rockoff asks whether high - value - added teachers (i.e., teachers who raise student
test scores) also have
positive longer - term impacts on students, as reflected in college attendance, earnings, -LSB-...]
Two experimental studies of the Charlotte privately - funded scholarship program, here and here, reported clear
positive effects on student
test scores but were limited to just a single year after random assignment.
Schneider and his colleagues believe that consumer choice in schooling can have
positive effects on education quality, and they support their belief with
test score data from New York City.
And to turn back to school choice for a moment, Imberman finds that charters in an unnamed urban district had no
effect on student
tests scores — but had large
positive effects on discipline and attendance.
The original evaluation identified, after three years, large
positive effects of the voucher opportunity on the
test scores of African Americans but not on the
test scores of students from other ethnic groups.
Charter schools benefit students in neighboring district schools
Positive effects found on
test scores, grade completion, and more, increasing with proximity
For example, the Gates Foundation's small school reforms were widely panned as a flop in early reviews relying on student
test scores, but a number of later rigorous studies showed (sometimes substantial)
positive effects on outcomes such as graduation and college enrollment.
Because
test scores and enrollment in college are not the end of the road for most students, and because emerging evidence suggests that these
positive effects may fade as students begin their adult lives.
The same program in recent years has generally not shown
positive effects on students»
test scores.
This pattern of
test -
score effects — showing
positive results in urban areas with many low - income students, but neutral or even negative
effects elsewhere — also appears in a national study of oversubscribed charter middle schools funded by the U.S. Department of Education.
This meta - analysis of social and emotional learning interventions (including 213 school - based SEL programs and 270,000 students from rural, suburban and urban areas) showed that social and emotional learning interventions had the following
effects on students ages 5 - 18: decreased emotional distress such as anxiety and depression, improved social and emotional skills (e.g., self - awareness, self - management, etc.), improved attitudes about self, others, and school (including higher academic motivation, stronger bonding with school and teachers, and more
positive attitudes about school), improvement in prosocial school and classroom behavior (e.g., following classroom rules), decreased classroom misbehavior and aggression, and improved academic performance (e.g. standardized achievement
test scores).
When those two factors are taken into account, the
positive effect of cognitive skills on annual economic growth becomes somewhat smaller, but is still 0.63 percentage points per half of a standard deviation of
test scores.
The
positive effect of taking statistics (relative to remedial elementary algebra without workshops) was similar across students with a wide range of placement
test scores (Figure 2).
The fallacy is in assuming that the majority of choice studies reporting
positive effects on
test scores is the same majority of choice studies reporting
positive effects on attainment.
The fallacy is in assuming that the majority of choice studies reporting
positive effects on
test scores
In Mike's second post criticizing our study he claims that the
test score effects of choice programs do reliably and positively predict their attainment
effects because, after throwing out some cases (I'll get to that later), «both short - term
test scores and long - term outcomes are overwhelmingly
positive.»
We found little evidence that the Choice program increased the
test scores of participating students, though our final analysis revealed a
positive effect of the program on reading
scores when combined with high stakes
testing.
If I had to bet on which intervention is most likely to work at scale, I'd be inclined to bet on a massive data set that found
positive effects on
test scores rather than a very narrow data set of three studies where only two study found higher degree attainment.
As Jay points out, the most rigorous charter research finds
positive effects on
test scores rather than attainment.
When I look within a three - mile radius, I find no evidence of spillover
effects on
test scores of students at district schools,
positive or negative.
Giving teachers both the lesson plans and support had a
positive, significant
effect on students» end - of - year math
test scores, according to the study, which was published as a working paper by the National Bureau of Economic Research.
The
effects of minimum - competency exams on average 8th grade NAEP
test scores were
positive but small and mainly insignificant.
But the total
effect on
test scores also increases because the
positive effect of adding a day to the school year is always greater than the negative
effect of the needed reduction in class size.
A 2004 study established the
positive effect of even modest increases in family income on student
test scores.
The paper, published in Education Finance and Policy, details the achievement impacts of 41 KIPP charter middle schools nationwide and reports consistently
positive and statistically significant
test -
score effects in reading, math, science, and social studies.
Promisingly, researchers have found that it is possible to orient students toward
positive learning mindsets through low - cost interventions, including online programs that teach students about growth mindsets and purpose.29 According to Carol Dweck and her colleagues, ``... educational interventions and initiatives that target these psychological factors can have transformative
effects on students» experience and achievement in school, improving core academic outcomes such as GPA and
test scores months and even years later.»
They found «a modest, statistically significant,
positive effect on student
test scores,» which they quantified as three additional weeks of learning per year in American schools (and four weeks when international studies were included).
«Research has consistently found that attending a charter school in Boston has large
positive effects on math and reading
test scores,» Cohodes reported.
Based on
scores in nationally standardized
tests (fourth grade reading and math and eighth grade reading and math), greater union membership of educators tends to have a
positive impact on student
test scores while larger class sizes tend to have a negative
effect.
We find some small differences across charter types, but none of the charter school enrollment
effects on
test score growth for any cohort were
positive among any of the three types examined.
However, when parents can choose how their children learn, research shows other
positive effects, in place of or in addition to
test scores.
Increasing racial, ethnic, linguistic, socio - economic, and gender diversity in the teacher workforce can have a
positive effect for all students, but the impact is even more pronounced when students have a teacher who shares characteristics of their identity.20 For example, teachers of color are often better able to engage students of color, 21 and students of color
score higher on standardized
tests when taught by teachers of color.22 By holding students of color to a set of high expectations, 23 providing culturally relevant teaching, confronting racism through teaching, and developing trusting relationships with their students, teachers of color can increase other educational outcomes for students of color, such as high school completion and college attendance.24
In a 2010 research review, Harvard University's Susan Eaton noted that racial segregation in schools has such a severe impact on the
test score - gap that it outweighs the
positive effects of a higher family income for minority students.
The study found that Boston charter schools have strong
positive effects of student
test score gains.
The arts integration program had a
positive statistically significant
effect on student standardized state
test scores as compared to control schools.
We find robust
positive effects of each program on third - grade
test scores in both reading and math.
They conclude that a teacher's experience,
test scores and regular licensure all have
positive effects on student achievement, with larger
effects for math than for reading.
We find that TFA teachers tend to have a
positive effect on high school student
test scores relative to non-TFA teachers, including those who are certified in - field.
In addition to these four state - based studies of voucher program impacts on
test scores, some recent studies do show
positive effects on graduation rates, parent satisfaction, community college enrollment, and other nonachievement - based outcomes, but it is unclear if these outcomes are lasting and valid.23 For example, research shows that nationally, graduation rates for students in public schools and peers participating in voucher programs equalize after adjusting for extended graduation rates.24 Some critics suggest that private schools may graduate students who have not successfully completed the full program.25 Also, in regard to parent satisfaction, while some studies do show greater satisfaction among parents whose children participate in voucher programs, the most recent evaluation of the D.C. voucher program shows that any increase in parent or student school satisfaction is not statistically significant.26
Find out all the details of this exclusive research project showing the
positive effects of the use of Reading Rods ® on literacy standardized
test scores for Grades 1 and 2.
The paper, by Raj Chetty and John N. Friedman of Harvard and Jonah E. Rockoff of Columbia, tracked 2.5 million students over 20 years, and using a value added approach, found that teachers who help students raise their standardized
test scores have a lasting
positive effect on those students» lives beyond academics, including lower teenage - pregnancy rates, greater college matriculation and higher adult earnings.