But at least much
positive than the long ones quoted to us by Reality's every day..!
Not exact matches
Some emails back were significantly
longer than the
ones I sent, all overwhelmingly
positive and open.
One of the best economic indicators, the yield curve or the spread between short and
long - term bonds remains in
positive territory, with the
long - term much higher
than the short.
«
One of the reasons why economic growth has been weaker in this expansion
than others is a lack of government spending now I think that in the short - term negative in the
long run I think a move in resources from the government sector to the private sector is
positive but it takes a while for that to manifest itself in stronger overall GDP growth».
In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more
than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a
positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the
long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no
one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the
long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating
than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative
one (much like Wenger's)
Expressing negative feelings is easier
than expressing
positive ones, so next time you're about to pass off a not - very - nice comment, think twice — it will be stored in your child's head for a
long time, she will «replay» your words to herself over and over again, because they matter to her, even if she won't admit it — is it really necessary?
On
one hand, the higher rates of preschool participation among children today suggest that any
positive long - term effects of extending universal public schooling to four - year - olds may be even smaller
than those estimated here for kindergarten.
One way to confirm this is the problem is to hook the car up to a scan tool and confirm
positive long term fuel trim (LTFT) values; with the given symptoms I expect the values to be relatively high (more
than +10 %).
Even more
than the sales and
positive reviews, this community of women is
one for which I have looked for a very
long time.
CC - I read into that piece an implicit admission that the Canadian market - place is dominated by bank owned brokerages pushing mutual funds (in a scale the American market - place is not) and it is a much easier sell to have actively managed portfolios begin to move to some passive investing products rather
than do the hard and
long sale of converting actively managed portfolios to passive managed
ones lock, stock and barrel - not to mention trying to ease the minds of the gatekeepers, the IA's, who may view Vanguard's entry in a much less
positive light
than the blogging community.
On the Premium Economy side of things I'm very
positive about this offer as I think Cathay has a very solid Premium Economy product — I'd be more
than happy to pay $ 1,185 for a trip as
long as the
one between New York and Hong Kong when I know I'll be getting a true Premium Economy product.
Even in simple systems, small
positive feedbacks can lead to stable situations as
long as the «gain» factor is less
than one (i.e. for every initial change in the quantity, the feedback change is less
than the original
one).
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower)
than lands on
long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a
positive feedback: or the water warms
than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly
positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower
than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's
one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer
than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
In fact, later in the book he argues for a
long - term alpha value of about 3.0 W / m ^ 2 / °C, indicating a weak
positive feedback, rather
than a strongly negative
one.
In an article published this week in Business Insider, Hannah Fry, a math whiz who works for at the UCL Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis in London, breaks down happily ever after in this formula, developed by another mathematician based on research at The Gottman Institute: The
longest - lasting couples felt they had more
positive interactions
than negative
ones on a daily basis, while those with the least longevity generally feel their negative interactions are more common
than happy
ones.
It concludes that these programs have short and
long term
positive consequences for students; in
one particularly dramatic finding, «in follow - up assessments an average of 3.5 years after the last intervention, the academic performance of students exposed to SEL programs was an average 13 percentile points higher
than their non-SEL peers, based on the eight studies that measured academics.»
I have found this method of working with couples to be far more effective in achieving immediate, sustained,
positive change
than the more common practice of meeting for a
one - hour therapy session, on a weekly basis, over a
long period of time.
Another way this type of video separates itself from others listed here is that it should end up being
one of your
longer recordings, as you will want to relay every
positive attribute about your company in the clip, including what makes your business special, how your firm is
one of the best - performing
ones in the area, and how you're a fixture in your community — all of which can't effectively be relayed in less
than 4 - 5 minutes.