Feuerbach, for example, was one of the first to understand
the positive value of religion in society, even when religion is understood as a human creation and expressed in naturalistic terms.
One can not find any convincing proofs that, for such persons,
the positive value of their religion in assuring their salvation was done away with after Jesus Christ.
Not exact matches
The «everything associated with
religion is bad» approach is ridiculous on its face; Dennett tries to examine the
value of religion to society from an objective viewpoint, examining whether it is a net
positive despite being based on fantasy.
Positive moral
value is taken in most
religions as an expression
of the will
of God.
We are learning to appreciate the
positive value in the nature
religion of indigenous peoples; we see it as a genuine form
of spirituality, no longer to be arrogantly dismissed as primitive magic.
All this being granted, Father Vagaggini said, it would appear that one can accept a further hypothesis: There is nothing to deny the fact that in the non-Christian
religions even after Jesus Christ there have been elements, in greater or lesser number — whether
of a ritualistic, institutional or doctrinal nature — with a
positive value for salvation, in the sense that God makes use
of them to effect the salvation
of those persons
of sincere faith who belong to these
religions.
However, there are groups
of tamed adherents
of secular ideologies and religious faiths who feel that in the dialogue between
religions and secular ideologies they must find some alternative path to save the
positive human
values and what modernity has realized
of them through the last three or four centuries.