Sentences with phrase «possibilities of human errors»

Automatic validation is applied for eBook conversions which eliminates possibilities of human errors present in the source materials.

The methods used for dating are accurate except for the possibility of human error.

Contraception is the promise of child - free sex, and when something goes wrong and a child is conceived ¯ due either to the technical failure rate of contraception or to the possibility of human error in anything we humans undertake ¯ abortion takes that child - free promissory note to the bank.

The printer enables Atala to scale up the technology, eliminating the time it takes to create new organs by hand and the possibility of human error.

The VIPS device requires very little training to operate compared to that required to learn standard emergency examination skills, thereby reducing the possibility of human error during emergency diagnosis.

When products are dispensed, there is always the slim possibility of human error, and there may have been a simple mistake (such as picking the wrong sized pack off the shelf).

Then there's the possibility of human error after your maintenance is complete.

Granted, there is always the possibility of human error and as such, the Moto X Pure Edition could have come out on top.

Not exact matches

That is defensible only if one is certain that the baseline level of possible robotic error in civilian protection exceeds that baseline level of human error... I, for one, would not bet against the possibility that for some military applications, we will some day come to see mere human judgment as guaranteeing an unacceptable level of indiscriminate and disproportionate violence.

80: «The mere process of verbalization, being a human and hence fallible operation, introduces possibilities of error that involve more than memory.»

While all attempts are made to provide accurate, current and reliable information, the Authority recognizes the possibility of human and / or mechanical error.

High reliability organisations — which have less than their fair share of accidents — recognise that human variability is a force to harness in averting errors, but they work hard to focus that variability and are constantly preoccupied with the possibility of failure

Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by Mergent's sources, Mergent or others, Mergent does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, timeliness or availability or for the results obtained from the use of such information.

Conspiracies are fine, but if they eradicate the possibility of human (or machine) error, what's even the point?

Consider the multiple possibilities of unfair coins, unexpected externalities that could affect outcomes, skilled coin toss experts and their chaotic human whims, social engineering of observers by dishonest actors and their chaotic whims, observational errors and the whims of observers, one would have to call actual coin tosses a spatial - temporal chaos model, in particular if one decides beforehand to do what one can to generate that outcome.

People are not machines and human error is as much a possibility in healthcare as any walk of life.