Not exact matches
3) The authors do not actually put forth «moral licensing» as their favored explanation
of the non-eco behaviors
of the
climate - believing subsample: they give equal weight, at least rhetorically, to the
possibility that the «Highly Concerned» «felt that federal policies were the more effective means
of addressing climate change (vs. individual pro-environmental behaviors).»
Of course, at the same time they could include comment addressing the possibility of other factors playing quantitatively significant roles in warming / climate chang
Of course, at the same time they could include comment
addressing the
possibility of other factors playing quantitatively significant roles in warming / climate chang
of other factors playing quantitatively significant roles in warming /
climate change.
The document analyzes the
possibility of addressing malnutrition, in a context where the effects
of climate change could threaten the progress achieved.
We have a unique opportunity to end the rancorous debate about
climate change, a debate that is poisoning the air — the political air, that is — and inhibiting progress on two fronts: progress on
addressing the
possibility that we are on the road to a catastrophic warming
of the globe, and progress on reforming our anti-growth tax structure, which is so inequitable that it is straining the public's belief in the fairness
of capitalism and what we like to call «the American Dream.»