Also some info on
possible effects of global warming would be a useful addition.
There are many helpful ways to consider and discuss
the possible effects of global warming.
50 Beech Future range Overlap Present range Fig. 20 - 13, p. 478 Figure 20.13 Natural capital degradation:
possible effects of global warming on the geographic range of beech trees based on ecological evidence and computer models.
Natural capital degradation:
possible effects of global warming on the geographic range of beech trees based on ecological evidence and computer models.
32 Effects on Biodiversity: Winners and Losers
Possible effects of global warming on the geographic range of beech trees based on ecological evidence and computer models.
Possible effects of global warming on the geographic range of beech trees based on ecological evidence and computer models.
Some possible effects of global warming are the inundation of low - lying islands due to rising sea levels, increased frequency of severe storms and the retreat of glaciers and icecaps.
So we have Stefan saying: Pam's high intensity and terrible impact on Vanuatu have invariably raised the question of
the possible effect of global warming on its characteristics.
Not exact matches
It's now commonplace to talk about
global warming and carbon footprints, so much so that it's easy to forget that until quite recently few thought it was even
possible that the actions
of our species could have a potentially catastrophic
effect on the Earth's climate.
What is alarming is that the volume
of water and the extent and rapidity
of its movement is suprisingly much greater than previously believed, and that a
possible, perhaps likely,
effect of this on ice sheet dynamics is to make the ice sheets less stable and more likely to respond more quickly to
global warming than previously expected.
His research interests include studying the interactions between El Niño / Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the monsoons
of Asia; identifying
possible effects on
global climate
of changing human factors, such as carbon dioxide, as well as natural factors, such as solar variability; and quantifying
possible future changes
of weather and climate extremes in a
warmer climate.
A
global warming phenomenon in our spaceship is one
of several unintended
effects of the unregulated, swift increase
of 1) absolute
global human population numbers, 2) per capita consumption
of limited resources, and 3) large - scale business activities that could be occurring synergistically and approaching a point in history when it will not be
possible for the Earth's resource base and frangible ecosystems services to sustain life as we now know it to be.
Note the reference to the
possible «countervailing
effects»
of particulates — and the recognition that
global warming could become a national security issue («a natural for NATO»), and
of the need to «stop burning fossil fuels».
In short, since 1997 there has been neither any
global warming nor any enhancement
of the greenhouse
effect to cause it in the first place, and with no
possible correlation between increased CO2 emissions and
global warming; there is simply no scientific basis for the for the ludicrous concept that fossil fuel derived CO2 emissions are or could even cause catastrophic
global warming!
It identifies locations in Maryland thought to be especially vulnerable to the
effects of global warming and makes provisions to protect them to the extent
possible from these
effects.
The science
of climate change «attribution» — linking specific extreme weather events to the
effects of global warming — is making substantial progress, so it is becoming increasingly
possible for scientists to tie particular weather patterns to climate change.
It is apparent to us that Tillerson was seeing climate change in a different light: the
global warming trend was having the
effect of making it
possible to drill for oil in areas that had heretofore been too covered in thick ice to make drilling feasible.
It may then be
possible to limit the disastrous
effects of anthropogenic
global warming.»
If after five years
of filtered sunlight a disaster occurred — a drought in India and Pakistan, for example, a
possible effect in one
of the modeling studies — we would not know whether it was caused by
global warming, the solar filter or natural variability.
«Although we were motivated in this research by an objective to expose
effects of human - made
global warming as soon as
possible...» UNQUOTE
«Although we were motivated in this research by an objective to expose
effects of human - made
global warming as soon as
possible...»
«Although we were motivated in this research by an objective to expose
effects of human - made
global warming as soon as
possible...» PNAS will have to answer for permitting this «special pleading» paper to be published.
The climate change had already affected the seas around Antarctica and is
warming some coastal waters.So now both Antarctic Peninsula and West Antarctica Ice sheet are losing ice.For now, the East Antarctic Ice sheet is stable but it will influence on
global climate change due to sea ice.In the future there is growing concern about the
possible impact
of climate change.Is Antarctica gaining ice that meant it will
effect to climate change and the ecosystem
of the regions?
In addition to rising temperatures, the report discussed a variety
of «other
possible effects of an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide», including melting
of the Antarctic ice cap, rise
of sea level,
warming of sea water, increased acidity
of fresh waters (which also applies to the danger
of ocean acidification,
global warming's evil twin), and an increase in plant photosynthesis.
Indeed, a portion
of that small linear trend difference might be due to human CO2 emissions; or, then again, it might be due to the vast urbanization
effect over the last 60 + years; or due to the large deforestation that's taken place; or, maybe it's entirely due to the serial fabrication
of global warming by the world's climate agencies; or it's even
possible that the post-1950
warming was entirely a natural phenomenon - the same as the prior 64 - year period experience.
Don't you think in order to remove the
effect of oscillation in the
global warming trend you need to consider the longest period
possible?
Concern with relatively small
effects of possible anthropogenic caused
global warming is a misplaced distraction, and will probably lead to the public losing confidence in scientists, and could weaken the support needed when real problems occur.»
Some
of this gas inevitably escaped into the environment, even though it was trapped as well as
possible, and since it is about 17000 times as powerful as a
global warming gas as CO 2, it had an
effect on the carbon footprints
of the cells.
Of the 67 percent of voters who told the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press in 2006 that it is possible to reduce the effects of global warming, nearly twice as many said it would require major sacrifices than said it could be done with technolog
Of the 67 percent
of voters who told the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press in 2006 that it is possible to reduce the effects of global warming, nearly twice as many said it would require major sacrifices than said it could be done with technolog
of voters who told the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press in 2006 that it is
possible to reduce the
effects of global warming, nearly twice as many said it would require major sacrifices than said it could be done with technolog
of global warming, nearly twice as many said it would require major sacrifices than said it could be done with technology.
Not only did you attack my comment on the basis
of my fairly offhand reference to hydrocarbon formation, (my intial comment primarily related to the dead zone off the Oregon coast and its
possible causes and
effects) you used my comment to claim that this website, which is one
of the few places where unbiased scientific discussion
of global warming appears outside
of strictly academic circles, has «way too much junk science».
In particular, you contend that given NOAA's February press release on the
possible acceleration
of global warming, it is important and appropriate for you to incorporate its
effects into your work at NWS.
The most widely quoted estimates, like those in the Dynamic Integrated Model
of Climate and the Economy, known as DICE, used by Yale's William Nordhaus and colleagues, depend upon educated guesswork to place a value on the negative
effects of global warming in a number
of crucial areas, especially agriculture and coastal protection, then try to make some allowance for other
possible repercussions.
Although we were motivated in this research by an objective to expose
effects of human - made
global warming as soon as
possible, we use an empirical approach that does not require knowledge
of the causes
of observed climate change.
What is alarming is that the volume
of water and the extent and rapidity
of its movement is suprisingly much greater than previously believed, and that a
possible, perhaps likely,
effect of this on ice sheet dynamics is to make the ice sheets less stable and more likely to respond more quickly to
global warming than previously expected.
If
possible at all, delaying the rise by storing water on Antarctica would only show significant
effects in a scenario
of ambitious climate policy, strictly limiting
global warming.