The IPCC TAR produced global temperature projections based on a number of
possible greenhouse gas emissions scenarios from their Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES).
Not exact matches
Our analyses focused on projecting the
possible range of temperature and precipitation amounts in Montana, under our chosen
greenhouse gas emission scenarios.
Based on results from large ensemble simulations with the Community Earth System Model, we show that internal variability alone leads to a prediction uncertainty of about two decades, while
scenario uncertainty between the strong (Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5) and medium (RCP4.5) forcing
scenarios [
possible paths for
greenhouse gas emissions] adds at least another 5 years.
Unlike the
scenarios developed by the IPCC and reported in Nakicenovic et al. (2000), which examined
possible global futures and associated
greenhouse - related
emissions in the absence of measures designed to limit anthropogenic climate change, RCP4.5 is a stabilization
scenario and assumes that climate policies, in this instance the introduction of a set of global
greenhouse gas emissions prices, are invoked to achieve the goal of limiting
emissions and radiative forcing.
The main purpose of the first phase (development of the RCPs) is to provide information on
possible development trajectories for the main forcing agents of climate change, consistent with current
scenario literature allowing subsequent analysis by both Climate models (CMs) and Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs).1 Climate modelers will use the time series of future concentrations and
emissions of
greenhouse gases and air pollutants and land - use change from the four RCPs in order to conduct new climate model experiments and produce new climate
scenarios as part of the parallel phase.
To the extent
possible, the
scenarios were mutually consistent, such that
scenarios of population (United Nations medium range estimate) and Gross Domestic Product (GDP)(moderate growth) were broadly in line with the transient
scenario of
greenhouse gas emissions (based on the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)
scenario A, see Hansen et al., 1988), and hence CO2 concentrations.
This suggests that IPCC projections of future global warming, which are based on various
possible human
greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, are reliable.