They didn't even look at climate change, only
the possible human causes of climate change.
Not exact matches
«A full reading
of Bernstein's email reveals an important point ---- his assertion that, in the 1980s, we never denied the
possible role
of human activity as a
cause for
climate change, and he further makes clear that, at that point in time, there was a great deal
of uncertainty and lack
of understanding
of climate change, even among leading scientists and experts,» said Keil, adding that today, Exxon «believes the risk
of climate change is clear, and warrants action.»
This magma plume isn't an alternative
possible cause of recent upticks in melting along the West Antarctic Ice Sheet attributed to
human - generated
climate change.
One paper found that a 2016 marine heat wave off the coast
of Alaska was unprecedented in terms
of the temperatures it reached and concluded that it would not have been
possible in a world where
human -
caused climate change was not occurring.
The National
Climate Assessment offers a wealth of actionable science about the causes, effects, risks and possible responses to human - caused climate
Climate Assessment offers a wealth
of actionable science about the
causes, effects, risks and
possible responses to
human -
caused climate climate change.
Scientifically, the meteorologists, climatologists, and atmospheric physicists, who were responsible for «discovering» the
human contribution to the terrestrial greenhouse effect, have been the most consistent champions
of its importance, while the solar physics community, and especially those interested in solar - terrestrial relations, have increasingly stressed the
possible importance
of the long - term variations
of the solar constant as the chief
cause of climate change.
Why do folk such as Fred Singer, Sallie Baliunas, Richard Lindzen, Pat Michaels, Bill Gray and others use their scientific credentials at every
possible opportunity when they speak out against the reality
of human caused climate change?
Any useful summary
of knowledge on the
causes and consequences
of climate change and
possible responses would have to include a hard look at the substantial (and sobering) body
of work on what shapes
human behavior: how people absorb or ignore scientific information — including the
climate panel's own reports — and what roadblocks in
human behavior await the menu
of possible policy options for limiting
climate - related risks.
The e-mail exchanges among several prominent American and British
climate -
change scientists appear to reveal efforts to keep the work
of skeptical scientists out
of major journals and the
possible hoarding and manipulation
of data to overstate the case for
human -
caused climate change.
Including the idea
of carbon removal enables us to explain
climate change in as simple a way as
possible:
climate change is
caused by the giant (albeit invisible) mess
humans are making in the sky by emitting carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses.
The consistency
of climate models made the eastern Mediterranean a great place to start looking for
possible connections between
human -
cause climate change and conflict.
Newsweek is out with a major survey
of possible ways to modify Earth's systems to mitigate or avoid
human -
caused climate change.
But we must implement these tools — wind, solar, EVs, efficiency, biomass, geothermal, biogas, tidal and others — as swiftly as
possible if we are to have much hope for avoiding the worst impacts
of human -
caused climate change.
The researchers, all
of whom are
possible candidates for the red team, attacked the findings
of mainstream science that
humans are the primary
cause of climate change.
I have found, through careful consideration, that the main
cause of this debacle where a majority believe
humans can control a complex system like planetary
climate is the quality
of responses to that pernicious assertion.It is not
possible to restore stability to
climate research based on contending with people who would literally become ill before they would
change their conclusions and it for this reason that people here are more accountable for the material they are responsible for.
On the basis
of well - established evidence from the past 20 years, there is now wide consensus among scientific organizations and approximately 97 %
of climatologists that
human - generated greenhouse gas emissions are the
cause of climate change.1 — 4 Although the effects
of climate change are already being felt across the world, the magnitude
of the effects
of future
changes depends on our ability to substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions and implement adaptation strategies within the ensuing decades.5 Thus, it remains
possible to protect children, families, and communities from the worst potential effects
of climate change.
There is growing observational data, physical analysis
of possible mechanisms, and model agreement that
human -
caused climate change is strengthening atmospheric circulation patterns in a way «which implies that the periodic and inevitable droughts California will experience will exhibit more severity...» «there is a traceable anthropogenic warming footprint in the enormous intensity
of the anomalous ridge during winter 2013 — 2014 and the associated drought.»
And if the
climate is currently warming, and we can (and have) eliminated other
possible causes for that
change, then
human produced greenhouse gasses are the most likely
cause of our current warming.
Although we were motivated in this research by an objective to expose effects
of human - made global warming as soon as
possible, we use an empirical approach that does not require knowledge
of the
causes of observed
climate change.