Pleistocene climate oscillations yield a fast - feedback climate sensitivity of 3 ± 1 °C for a 4 W m − 2 CO2 forcing if Holocene warming relative to the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) is used as calibration, but the error (uncertainty) is substantial and partly subjective because of poorly defined LGM global temperature and
possible human influences in the Holocene.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was ostensibly organized in 1988 to examine
possible human influences on Earth's climate.
Its original goal was to assess
possible human influences on global warming and potential risks of human - induced warming.
But if we only calculate
possible human influence as merely difference in emission per year........
Since the first thoughts of
a possible human influence on climate over a hundred years ago, more and more evidence has accumulated and the idea gradually gained credibility.
Not exact matches
Self - comparison can be a strong
influence on
human behavior, and because people tend to display the most positive aspects of their lives on social media, it is
possible for an individual to believe that their own life compares negatively to what they see presented by others.
Whether one is a determinist or a believer in self - transcendence, HGI may provide information that makes it
possible to
influence human destiny through biological engineering.
Consequently, if it is not
possible for him, psychologically to surround each being with that particular, overflowing affection which characterizes our
human love, at least he can nurture in his heart that generalized but none the less real affection for all that is which will cause him to cherish in each thing, over and above its surface qualities, the being itself — that is to say, that indefinable, elect part of each thing which, under God's
influence, gradually becomes flesh of his flesh.
If I am not mistaken, There was recently a scientific conclusion that it was not
possible for the
human body to have just happened, that there had to have been an
influence that is beyond their ability to explain.
Modern psychosomatic medicine has made some progress in analyzing along these lines; for example, it seems quite
possible that the emotional tone of my soul may directly alter the patterns of physical feeling in my stomach.4 Still, we should not suppose too quickly that the aims of a
human personality have any very effective direct
influence on the molecules of body cells, other than those in the brain.
However, there is a mode of consciousness by which we at the
human level of emergence might become aware, in a non - controlling, non-comprehensive sort of way, of
possible higher purposive principles and patterns of
influence operative in the cosmos.
«It's
possible that some of these same mechanisms that we've seen in yeast may be
influencing the amount of damage that is forming and how quickly it is repaired in
human cells,» he said.
In lyrical prose, Fox ruminates on how these perceptions might
influence our attitude toward the planet once
human travel is
possible.
«This is by far the largest twin study of gene expression ever published, enabling us to make a roadmap of genes versus environment,» Sullivan says, adding that the study measured relationships with disease more precisely than had been previously
possible, and uncovered important connections to recent
human evolution and genetic
influence in disease.
To attribute any specific extreme weather event — such as the downpours that caused flooding in Pakistan or Australia, for example — requires running such computer models thousands of times to detect any
possible human impact amidst all the natural
influences on a given day's weather.
In addition, given that many
human influences are driving both climate change and biodiversity loss, researchers should look for «win - win» solutions wherever
possible.
The research made use of the weather@home citizen - science project, part of Oxford's climateprediction.net climate modelling experiment, to model
possible weather for January 2014 in both the current climate and one in which there was no
human influence on the atmosphere.
To be able to do this world we made use of over 100,000 weather@home simulation of
possible weather in January 204 in both the current climate and one in which there was no
human influence on the atmosphere.
Instead, it is
possible that the variant could help to
influence human activity in a way that leads to changes in societal pressure and behaviour.
RE: the strength of the scores — it's entirely
possible (and in fact, likely given the way we
humans work) that the strength of the early praise for Braid has
influenced subsequent reviewers.
Isn't it
possible that some
humans may have figured out how to
influence pre-human climate by teleporting thought waves through space / time anomalies?
The climate panel was created in 1988 under United Nations auspices to periodically review factors,
human and natural,
influencing climate and assess
possible ways to limit risks.
It's certainly
possible to filter out «weather» from the temperature record, but I'm uncomfortable ascribing the label «
Human Signal» to what's left — You could use «Climatic / Temperature trend» instead, and attribute an
influence on that trend as being Anthropogenic in origin — which I think is what you mean.
To get a sense of how the views of Arctic experts have coalesced around a rising
human influence on the region's climate, you can scan previous stories from 2001, 2005, and 2007 on ice trends and
possible causes.
In many cases, it is now often
possible to make and defend quantitative statements about the extent to which
human - induced climate change (or another causal factor, such as a specific mode of natural variability) has
influenced either the magnitude or the probability of occurrence of specific types of events or event classes.»
For a very long time now I have been trying every
possible way to tell the story of the growing
human influence on that sheath of air in a way that catches attention but remains true to what is known, and unknown, about what lies ahead.
But the
human influence could be much smaller than what you can imagine physically
possible.
I think that debate of any null hypothesis less rigorous than the claim that «any
human influence on climate is more catastrophic than any
possible alternative action man might take» will ultimately be used by the CAGW forces as if that catastrophic version were indeed the one that had been debated and not falsified.
As we say often, it is perfectly
possible to believe that
humans have
influenced the climate, and that this
influence will cause problems, while remaining sceptical of the political actions to try and stop it.
Two to, say, 5 generations from now, it's quite
possible to mitigate OUR
human influence on climate...
Since IPCC ClimAstrology ONLY looks at
human influence and doesn't even bother with the knowns much less the unknown unknowns, they haven't even advanced to first base yet which is gathering as much data as
possible before advancing a theory to be tested with comparison to reality.
«[I] t is not
possible to tell how much of the modest recent warming can be ascribed to
human influences,» wrote Happer, Koonin and Lindzen, «and there have been no detrimental changes observed in most salient climate variables and projections of future changes are highly uncertain.»
«Due to the large amount of variability in UK rainfall, it's not yet
possible to say whether
human influence directly impacted this year's total.»
The ONLY warming has come from El Ninos which can not, in any
possible way, be
influenced by
human anything.
People have ignored seafloor volcanoes on the idea that their
influence is small ============= But, but, but we have studied all the
possible explanations we can find for global warming, but none of them are the cause, so therefore we know it must be
humans.
This will help scientists explore, more accurately than is
possible today, how rising temperatures, shifting precipitation patterns, increasing greenhouse gas levels, and other natural and
human - induced changes affect tropical forests»
influence on Earth's climate.
It makes no sense at all to claim that an explanation of later 20th century warming is not
possible without including «
human influences,» when in fact an explanation of later 20th century warming is not
possible, period.
Back to more recent times, natural factors like the PDO have a demonstrated huge
influence on global temperatures, so large that any
possible «
human influence» greatly pales in comparison.