The ISPM generalizes as follows: «Attribution studies to date do not take into account all known sources of
possible influence on the climate.»
In addition, the amended standards add «natural forces» as an area of study for
its possible influence on climate change.
Not exact matches
The research made use of the weather@home citizen - science project, part of Oxford's climateprediction.net
climate modelling experiment, to model
possible weather for January 2014 in both the current
climate and one in which there was no human
influence on the atmosphere.
To be able to do this world we made use of over 100,000 weather@home simulation of
possible weather in January 204 in both the current
climate and one in which there was no human
influence on the atmosphere.
In 2014,
Climate Central helped create the World Weather Attribution (WWA) initiative, a groundbreaking international effort to analyze and communicate the possible influence of climate change on extreme weather events such as storms, extreme rainfall, heat waves, cold spells, and dr
Climate Central helped create the World Weather Attribution (WWA) initiative, a groundbreaking international effort to analyze and communicate the
possible influence of
climate change on extreme weather events such as storms, extreme rainfall, heat waves, cold spells, and dr
climate change
on extreme weather events such as storms, extreme rainfall, heat waves, cold spells, and droughts.
To get a sense of how the views of Arctic experts have coalesced around a rising human
influence on the region's
climate, you can scan previous stories from 2001, 2005, and 2007
on ice trends and
possible causes.
[Response: While I wouldn't quite characterize this in terms of a «permanent El Nino», a reasonably up - to - date discussion of
possible climate change
influences on ENSO is provided in our previous article El Nino and Global Warming — mike]
So: The study finds a fingerprint of anthropogenic
influences on large scale increase in precipitation extremes, with remaining uncertainties — namely that there is still a possibility that the widespread increase in heavy precipitation could be due to an unusual event of natural variability.The intensification of extreme rainfall is expected with warming, and there is a clear physical mechanism for it, but it is never
possible to completely separate a signal of external forcing from
climate variability — the separation will always be statistical in nature.
I think that debate of any null hypothesis less rigorous than the claim that «any human
influence on climate is more catastrophic than any
possible alternative action man might take» will ultimately be used by the CAGW forces as if that catastrophic version were indeed the one that had been debated and not falsified.
«Solar Variability
Influences on Weather and
Climate:
Possible Connections through Cosmic Ray Fluxes and Storm Intensification.»
The press actually produced quite a bit of nuanced coverage, which explained that while it's impossible to peg any single weather event to
climate change, many scientists felt that summer's extremes would not have been
possible without humanity's
influence on the
climate system.
Focusing
on the «pause» is mainly significant in context of the comparison between
climate model projections and surface temperatures... Attempts to spin 2014 as a
possible «warmest year» is exactly that: spin designed to
influence the Lima deliberations....
This similar pacing suggests
possible stadium - wave
influence on synchronizations of interannual - to - interdecadally - varying indices within the
climate network.
Two to, say, 5 generations from now, it's quite
possible to mitigate OUR human
influence on climate...
The slower components of the
climate system (e.g. the ocean and biosphere) affect the statistics of
climate variables (e.g. precipitation) and since they may feel the
influence of their initial state at multi decadal time scales, it is
possible that
climate changes also depend
on the initial state of the
climate system (e.g. Collins, 2002; Pielke, 1998).
Nobody denies the existence of a solar
influence on climate, indeed it seems to have been a major cause of the LIA, and to have played a part in early 20th century warming, but Mike Lockwood showed that all the
possible solar
influences were of the wrong sign to explain recent GW.
The
climate change had already affected the seas around Antarctica and is warming some coastal waters.So now both Antarctic Peninsula and West Antarctica Ice sheet are losing ice.For now, the East Antarctic Ice sheet is stable but it will
influence on global
climate change due to sea ice.In the future there is growing concern about the
possible impact of
climate change.Is Antarctica gaining ice that meant it will effect to
climate change and the ecosystem of the regions?
The Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change was ostensibly organized in 1988 to examine possible human influences on Earth's c
Climate Change was ostensibly organized in 1988 to examine
possible human
influences on Earth's
climateclimate.
Possible evidence of the resonant
influence of solar forcing
on the
climate system.
Since the first thoughts of a
possible human
influence on climate over a hundred years ago, more and more evidence has accumulated and the idea gradually gained credibility.
This will help scientists explore, more accurately than is
possible today, how rising temperatures, shifting precipitation patterns, increasing greenhouse gas levels, and other natural and human - induced changes affect tropical forests»
influence on Earth's
climate.
Unger, N.B., D.T. Shindell, D.M. Koch, M. Amann, J. Cofala, and D.G. Streets, 2006:
Influences of man - made emissions and
climate changes
on tropospheric ozone, methane and sulfate at 2030 from a broad range of
possible futures.
Arctic change and
possible influence on mid-latitude
climate and weather: A US CLIVAR White Paper (Cohen and Coauthors)