Significant hazard classification —
possible loss of human life and likely significant property or environmental destruction if the dam fails,
Not exact matches
There is necessary War, and there are rules we can impose and measures we can take to try and preserve as much
of our humanity as
possible, but the widescale risk and
loss of human life that is garaunteed with war is not and CAN NOT be just.
Also the collateral damage, specifically the
possible loss of innocent
human life, is taken into account.
If the whole
of Eastern Antarctica melts, a 19m global sea - level rise is
possible, but the effect
of this lesser rise would still be catastrophic to both cities and agricultural land, apart from immediate
loss of human lives.
In many cases, it appears that
possible negative impacts
of climate change pose risks
of higher total monetary damages in industrialised areas (i.e., currency valuations
of property damages) but higher total
human damages in less - developed areas (i.e.,
losses of life and dislocations
of population)-- although such events as Hurricane Katrina show that there are exceptions (Section 7.4.2.5) for developed countries, and monetary damages in developing countries may represent a larger share
of their GDP.