Sentences with phrase «possible outcome of his decision»

To drink and drive was actually a personal decision made by the driver and he was aware of the possible outcome of his decision.

Not exact matches

One sign of poor leadership is when the boss speaks before really knowing all of the details or analyzing the possible outcome for a given decision.

Try to imagine the possible outcomes of any particular decision, and think about potential snags that might ensue from it.

To be sure, compensation committee members base their decisions on the beliefs and desires of others, and that leaves a wide range of possible outcomes.

«Buyer Scenario Modeling is the process of analyzing research - based modeling of possible events, nurturing scenarios, buying scenarios, buying behaviors, buying decisions, and alternative future outcomes.»

Previous studies indicated that when a decision is based on visual input, for example, assemblies of neurons start accumulating visual evidence in favour of the possible outcomes, a decision being triggered when the evidence favouring one outcome crosses a threshold.

That is, they give arguments in favor of their views as if questions of better and worse, truth or falsehood, were relevant to the outcome, as if, in other words, rational decision was possible.

Of course, parents must make a decision based on the best possible outcome for each individual child and the family as a whole, and not at the whim of a young chilOf course, parents must make a decision based on the best possible outcome for each individual child and the family as a whole, and not at the whim of a young chilof a young child.

A broader economic approach to the measurement of outcomes, such as stated preference discrete choice modelling, might have captured women's preferences for alternative attributes of planned place of birth and might have been more informative to decision makers, 28 but this was not practically possible given the anonymity involved in the study design and the available resources.

The hope is that, no matter the outcome of the vote, we will all have taken part and we will all have made an as informed decision as possible.

Previous studies have shown that when we have to make a decision based on visual input, assemblies of neurons start accumulating visual evidence in favour of the various possible outcomes.

Decision theory — the tool of management that suggests making optimal choices by summing discounted future values over the probability distribution of all possible outcomes — is of limited usefulness, as are businesses» five - year plans.

The computer model, referred to as a decision analysis, takes into account all possible outcomes for each step of the process.

Although the decision to have your dog undergo surgery is ultimately up to you, our veterinary team will present you with all the facts and possible outcomes to help you make an informed, ethical and compassionate decision that is in the best interest of both you and your loyal canine friend.

The APDT believes that it is unreasonable to expect law enforcement officers to have a thorough understanding of dog behavior and / or ability to read dog body language and make split - second decisions while under stress and duress, that will necessarily result in the best possible outcomes for the dog or dogs in question.

It is possible to view these canvases in procedural terms, for there is always a palpable, enlivening sense of the artist making decisions or changing course, deflecting quick resolutions or alighting on happy accidents that lead to another set of problems, more possible outcomes.

The observations in his REStat paper are artefacts of a specific theory of decision under risk (Subjective Expected Utility) and (to boot) a specific functional form for one of the great universe of underlying functions possible in the SEU framework (logarithmic utility of outcomes, which is unbounded both below and above... a very special case in the universe of possible utilities of outcomes).

In situations where probabilities can not be defined, economic analysis can define scenarios that describe a possible set of outcomes for each adaptation measure which meet some criteria of minimum acceptable benefits across a range of scenarios, allowing the decision - maker to explore different levels of acceptable benefits in a systematic way.

One aspect of the decision making process that seems to get short shrift is quantifying the costs involved in mitigation and adaptation versus the potential costs of future events (obviously, the scenario discovery you mentioned would be the first step to quantifying the full range of possible outcomes).

What you have just written David tells me that the underlying root cause of the problem is the «precautionary principle» itself: IOW the notion that a remotely possible but highly unlikely and uncertain catastrophic outcome must be given heavy weighting in the political decision - making process, simply because the posited impact is so devastating.

You have to consider the entire distribution of possible outcomes when you make decisions like this.»

The Judge concluded the case by pointing out that the dispute demonstrated the range of possible outcomes when parties are calculating Close - Out Amounts, and the wisdom of ISDA making the changes that it did in the 2002 Agreement — NPC illustrated the type of outcome that a party given the role of decision maker and limited only by a requirement of rationality might press for, regardless of the fact of an actual replacement transaction.

Under the reasonableness standard the reviewing court defers to the statutory decision - maker and limits its review to an inquiry as to whether the impugned decision is intelligible, transparent, and justified, as well as within the range of possible outcomes given the applicable facts and law in question (Dunsmuir at para 47).

The clear pros and cons you gave as to the possible outcome of the case, helped me greatly in making decisions.

The choice of who to instruct is a decision for you alone and it is important to find somebody who you feel comfortable working with in order to get the best possible outcome in your divorce.

It was not a disaster for those in support of limiting the actual and apparent corrupting effects of money (and judges» direct solicitation of that money from the lawyers and parties likely to appear before them), but perhaps the best possible outcomes would be either a 5 - 4 decision upholding the Canon or a narrow decision essentially carving out a First - Amendment - driven, mass - mailing - like exception to the Canon.

Review by a court of the reasonableness of a decision made by another repository of power «is concerned mostly with the existence of justification, transparency and intelligibility within the decision - making process» but also with «whether the decision falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law».

A review on the basis of reasonableness, applying the standard from the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 («Dunsmuir»), means that the decision must fall «within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law.

While I still think mediators in a med - arb situation need to be careful in how they express their views of possible outcomes at adjudication, this decision gives sufficient scope to be able to meaningfully assist the parties in coming to a settlement.

A lawyer can explain the nuances of personal injury law and the possible outcomes given the facts of your case so that you can make informed decisions to help you and your family.

What this means is that when undertaking Judicial Review functions on a reasonableness standard, the concern is centred on ``... the existence of justification, transparency and intelligibility...», but where it can be shown that the decision, however much a party such as ATCO may not like it, still falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes, Courts of Appeal will be loathe to intervene.

There's a huge difference between a hypothetical product that could accurately predict the outcome of any case just by analysing the text of past written decisions (this is likely impossible at the current moment) and a predictive analytics product that provides an answer to a well - defined question with only two possible outcomes.

Overall, Justices Miller and Lauwers agreed with their colleague that this case falls within the category of exceptional cases in which remitting the matter to the decision - maker would be pointless since there is only one possible outcome.

This is so because failing to give reasons might be considered a paradigm case of a legal flaw in the making of a decision that «makes no difference» to the outcome, thus making it entirely possible to conclude that it is «highly likely» that the outcome for the claimant would have been the same even if the «conduct complained of» — that is, the failure to give reasons — had not occurred.

However there is an exception where doing so would be «pointless» as there is only one possible outcome in view of the court's decision.

Referring to SCC decisions of Canada v. Khosa, 2009 SCC and Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan, 2003 SCC 20 *, the C.A. held the chambers judge was required to consider whether the arbitrator's decision fell within a range of possible acceptable outcomes defensible in light of the facts and the law.

The C.A. agreed the chambers judge was correct to conclude the arbitrator's decision was unreasonable and not within the range of possible outcomes defensible in light of the facts and law.

What is important there is not so much the outcome of the Supreme Court decision on the process for «Brexit» but certainty, as soon as possible, about when the UK Government will trigger article 50 and what — given that we now know that the UK is leaving the single market — transitional arrangements for insurance and financial services will look like.

But it is also concerned with whether the decision falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law.

The other possible outcome of the Wong decision is it may prompt employers to take a stronger position if they suspect a terminated employee has breached a confidentiality provision but they weren't sure whether to pursue it further.

Therefore, the applications judge erred by finding that the decision of the majority was reasonable and within the range of possible outcomes.»

It uses a Monte Carlo simulation model, a technique used to configure several possible outcomes, for better decision making in times of risky investment.

Consequential thinking is the process of considering possible outcomes when you are making a decision while experiencing pronounced emotion.

Collaborative Law is worth considering if some or all of the following are true for you: (a) you want a civilized, rational resolution of the issues, (b) you would like to keep open the possibility of a viable working relationship with your partner down the road, (c) you and your partner will be raising children together and you want the best working relationship possible, (d) you want to protect your children from the harm associated with litigation between parents, (e) you have ethical or spiritual beliefs that place high value on taking personal responsibility for handling conflicts with integrity, (f) you value control and autonomous decision making and do not want to hand over decisions about restructuring your financial and parenting arrangements to a stranger (a judge), (g) you recognize the restricted and often unpredictable range of outcomes and «rough justice» generally available in the public court system and want a more creative and individualized range of choices available to you and your spouse or partner for resolving the issues.

There are as many outcomes possible as there are communities, ways of governing, exercising control and administering decisions.

In «feeling» decisions, one considers the impact of possible outcomes on the different people who would be affected by the decision.

There may be as many outcomes possible as there are communities, ways of governing, exercising control and administering decisions.

The absence of appropriate internal and external decision - making processes in native title not only delays the determination of outcomes, it provides opportunities for latent conflict (such as intra / inter-family disputes, economic disparity, and historical and contemporary cultural issues that centre on identity) to surface and further complicate and delay reaching the best possible outcome.

There are many ways to make an investment decision, but one of the best is expected value, the sum of values of all possible outcomes for a given decision.