Sentences with phrase «possible parties in the cases»

Not exact matches

It's possible the WFP could endorse Nixon but not give her its ballot line, putting a placeholder candidate there instead — just in case there's a post-primary peace deal between the governor and the party that requires her to go away quietly before the November general, though, as Nick reported yesterday, there are ways of getting her name off the ballot if necessary, too.

This was done to eliminate the potential of a collateral damage to his chances to the highest office of the land, in case of a possible slip of tongue in indecent language inJohn's submissions on behalf of the party in his conversation with the media and opponents of the Pparty in his conversation with the media and opponents of the PartyParty.

In some cases, it's possible that elections will end up being re-run — creating a raft of potentially awkward by - elections for the party.

Both of the Michigan Libertarian Party ballot access cases are still actively trying to win a court ruling that will make it possible for voters to vote «Libertarian» for President without the need to cast a write - in vote.

In that case, investigators are examining whether donations to the candidates were funneled through county party committees to evade contribution limits, a violation of state law and a possible felony.

A statistical analysis of possible primary results by FiveThirtyEight previewed what the national write - ups will say in the case of such a result: «Winning only 70 percent of the vote would mean that voters in his party don't like Cuomo much more than voters in general do.

It is possible that the centre right will fall short of a majority; in this case New Zealand First and the Maori party would hold the balance of power.

The Deputy Chairman of the Conservative party, Michael Fallon has said that «getting special access to the party» has never been the case with the Conservative government, and that Peter Cruddas «was wrong» in suggesting that it was possible.

In this case, allowing a new lender to enter the situation, even if the existing lender will be primed, may be the best possible option for all parties involved.

In many cases, it's possible to work out an arrangement that all parties can live with.

In A v A [2006] EWHC 2900 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 41 (Jan) Baron J raised the question of whether it may be inappropriate for legal advisers to act again for a party where an agreement is subsequently challenged; and in this I v I Charles J questions whether the wife's lawyers should have acted for her in this case because of a possible conflicIn A v A [2006] EWHC 2900 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 41 (Jan) Baron J raised the question of whether it may be inappropriate for legal advisers to act again for a party where an agreement is subsequently challenged; and in this I v I Charles J questions whether the wife's lawyers should have acted for her in this case because of a possible conflicin this I v I Charles J questions whether the wife's lawyers should have acted for her in this case because of a possible conflicin this case because of a possible conflict.

In this case, we can name all responsible parties in your personal injury lawsuit to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation possiblIn this case, we can name all responsible parties in your personal injury lawsuit to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation possiblin your personal injury lawsuit to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation possible.

Whenever possible, parties and their attorneys should be empowered to select processes for addressing issues in their cases that are compatible with the family's needs, financial circumstances, and legal requirements.

The Judge concluded the case by pointing out that the dispute demonstrated the range of possible outcomes when parties are calculating Close - Out Amounts, and the wisdom of ISDA making the changes that it did in the 2002 Agreement — NPC illustrated the type of outcome that a party given the role of decision maker and limited only by a requirement of rationality might press for, regardless of the fact of an actual replacement transaction.

Where a case has been unsuccessful, the court proceeds to hold a mandatory case management conference with the parties and their counsel (as another means of exploring the issues in dispute and possible resolution) before proceeding to trial.

We will thoroughly explore and pursue all possible liable parties in your case.

In PAP and non-PAP cases: notice of the existence of a funding arrangement should be communicated to all other parties as soon as possible; if proceedings are started for limitation reasons with bad pre-action manners, the parties should seek to agree to apply to the court for a stay while they take steps to comply; and where proceedings are started, the claimant should state in the claim form or particulars of claim whether they have complied with the PD and any relevant PAIn PAP and non-PAP cases: notice of the existence of a funding arrangement should be communicated to all other parties as soon as possible; if proceedings are started for limitation reasons with bad pre-action manners, the parties should seek to agree to apply to the court for a stay while they take steps to comply; and where proceedings are started, the claimant should state in the claim form or particulars of claim whether they have complied with the PD and any relevant PAin the claim form or particulars of claim whether they have complied with the PD and any relevant PAP.

In those cases where it is clear either (a) that the parties did not intend a joint tenancy at the outset or (b) had changed their original intention, but it is not possible to ascertain by direct evidence or by inference what their actual intention was as to the shares in which they would own the property, «the answer is that each is entitled to that share which the Court considers fair having regard to the whole course of dealing between them in relation to the property»In those cases where it is clear either (a) that the parties did not intend a joint tenancy at the outset or (b) had changed their original intention, but it is not possible to ascertain by direct evidence or by inference what their actual intention was as to the shares in which they would own the property, «the answer is that each is entitled to that share which the Court considers fair having regard to the whole course of dealing between them in relation to the property»in which they would own the property, «the answer is that each is entitled to that share which the Court considers fair having regard to the whole course of dealing between them in relation to the property»in relation to the property».

In particular, note that Civil Procedure Rule 31.4 and Practice Direction 31.2 A require that parties discuss with their opponents and, where possible, agree a strategy for the search and production of key evidence including ESI at an early stage, before the Case Management Conference.

It is important to have an experienced personal injury attorney review the facts in your case, investigate, and determine who all the possible responsible parties are.

While it is theoretically possible for native title disputes to be settled quickly and cooperatively, the combination of procedural and evidential complexity, high stakes, multiple parties, uncertainty of outcome, and a winner - take - all approach means that most cases are heavily litigated, go on for years, cost a fortune in legal and other costs — and often result in crushing disappointment, since claimants bear the onus of proof in difficult circumstances.»

Mr. Doran has made such cases a mission and takes them on with personal commitment to seek the maximum possible compensation in a lawsuit or claim against the responsible party.

With every case, we thoroughly investigate the facts pertaining to the case, including examining the evidence, interviewing witnesses and communicating with important parties, such as the prosecution and local judges, in order to prepare our clients» cases as efficiently as possible.

* The name of the case, the identity of the party we represent, and how to bill the time; * The issue that needs to be answered; * The facts of the case I think are most pertinent to the issue; * The procedural posture of the case and how the work product will be used — for a motion to compel, for a response to a motion for summary judgment, for an evaluation letter to the client, etc. * Whether I think the issue has been researched at any other time in the office, and how to find the old research; * The result I want to reach, i.e., what I'd like the answer to be, if possible.

It gives rise to questions of how can cases of complex inquiry best be handled by family courts in a way which parties feel is as fair as possible.

Since in references for a preliminary ruling the determinations of national courts will generally be accepted by the CJEU, and a request to intervene in a preliminary ruling procedure to submit observations on third country law is not possible, there is a risk that a judgment in such a case could be based on an insufficient evaluation of third country law, such as when the evidence concerning such law is uncontested and is presented only by a single party.

«A represented party is entitled to every possible and reasonable leeway to present a case in its entirety and... strict mechanical rules should be relaxed for unrepresented litigants.»

But I am fortified in the knowledge that this will probably be explored in private during the mediation and if one party is labouring under a misapprehension about the strength of their case, then surely it assists for that party to be disabused as early as possible?

In this case the parties exchanged a total of seven emails about the plaintiff Girouard's possible purchase of the defendant Druet's condominium apartment in MonctoIn this case the parties exchanged a total of seven emails about the plaintiff Girouard's possible purchase of the defendant Druet's condominium apartment in Monctoin Moncton.

In any case where the documentation for an appeal is likely to be substantial, and especially where several related appeals are to proceed together, it is appropriate for economy of documentation to be agreed, if possible, between the parties, and if necessary for relevant directions to be sought from the court.

Covenience In any case where the documentation for the appeal or appeals was likely to be substantial, and especially where several related appeals were to proceed together, it was appropriate for economy of documentation to be agreed, if possible, between the parties, and if necessary for relevant directions to be sought from the court.

-- The involvement of other parties to the suit is only relevant in cases where that is asserted as a possible connecting factor and in relation to avoiding a multiplicity of proceedings under forum non conveniens.

Most cases involving support issues go before a Dispute Resolution Officer who is a senior lawyer volunteering to help resolve cases, if possible, or at least ensure that the parties are ready for the next step in the process.

Thus, the 1963 Council of Europe Convention on the Reduction of Cases of Multiple Nationality and Military Obligations in Cases of Multiple Nationality (which has not been signed by the Republic of Lithuania) provides: the Member States of the Council of Europe, signatory hereto, considering that cases of multiple nationality are liable to cause difficulties and that joint action to reduce as far as possible the number of cases of multiple nationality, as between member States, corresponds to the aims of the Council of Europe (Preamble); nationals of the Contracting Parties who are of full age and who acquire of their own free will, by means of naturalisation, option or recovery, the nationality of another Party shall lose their former nationality and they shall not be authorised to retain their former nationality (ArticlCases of Multiple Nationality and Military Obligations in Cases of Multiple Nationality (which has not been signed by the Republic of Lithuania) provides: the Member States of the Council of Europe, signatory hereto, considering that cases of multiple nationality are liable to cause difficulties and that joint action to reduce as far as possible the number of cases of multiple nationality, as between member States, corresponds to the aims of the Council of Europe (Preamble); nationals of the Contracting Parties who are of full age and who acquire of their own free will, by means of naturalisation, option or recovery, the nationality of another Party shall lose their former nationality and they shall not be authorised to retain their former nationality (ArticlCases of Multiple Nationality (which has not been signed by the Republic of Lithuania) provides: the Member States of the Council of Europe, signatory hereto, considering that cases of multiple nationality are liable to cause difficulties and that joint action to reduce as far as possible the number of cases of multiple nationality, as between member States, corresponds to the aims of the Council of Europe (Preamble); nationals of the Contracting Parties who are of full age and who acquire of their own free will, by means of naturalisation, option or recovery, the nationality of another Party shall lose their former nationality and they shall not be authorised to retain their former nationality (Articlcases of multiple nationality are liable to cause difficulties and that joint action to reduce as far as possible the number of cases of multiple nationality, as between member States, corresponds to the aims of the Council of Europe (Preamble); nationals of the Contracting Parties who are of full age and who acquire of their own free will, by means of naturalisation, option or recovery, the nationality of another Party shall lose their former nationality and they shall not be authorised to retain their former nationality (Articlcases of multiple nationality, as between member States, corresponds to the aims of the Council of Europe (Preamble); nationals of the Contracting Parties who are of full age and who acquire of their own free will, by means of naturalisation, option or recovery, the nationality of another Party shall lose their former nationality and they shall not be authorised to retain their former nationality (Article 1).

When dealing with a family matter in court, it is important to work with a Loudoun County family lawyer that can offer objective guidance and is acquainted with the other parties during the proceedings to ensure the best outcome possible for your case.

In many child custody cases, the noncustodial party is required to pay child support to ensure that the child is given ample opportunity to receive the best life possible.

Fiss would likely agree with Brown's view in Markicevic that «the primary purpose of our civil justice system must be to enable those who have legal disputes against each other to secure an impartial third - party adjudication of their disputes [and that] the best way to adjudicate the merits of the case is not through endless interlocutory motions... nor is it through making every case pass through the hoop of rigid mandatory mediation, when the nature of some disputes dictates getting before a judge as soon as possible.»

Both cases show that it is possible to adduce third - party expert evidence in a form not governed by CPR Pt 35 and in circumstances where the author of the evidence will not be called, and, indeed, may not even be named or identified clearly.

The purpose of the Judicial Case Conference is to try to narrow the issues between the parties and reach consensus if possible and in some cases, reach an overall settlement of the cCase Conference is to try to narrow the issues between the parties and reach consensus if possible and in some cases, reach an overall settlement of the casecase.

In some cases, parties with an interest in the outcome of a wrongful death case may be reluctant to produce evidence necessary to the plaintiff's case and may even be tempted to destroy it, so it is critical for surviving family members to retain legal counsel as soon as possiblIn some cases, parties with an interest in the outcome of a wrongful death case may be reluctant to produce evidence necessary to the plaintiff's case and may even be tempted to destroy it, so it is critical for surviving family members to retain legal counsel as soon as possiblin the outcome of a wrongful death case may be reluctant to produce evidence necessary to the plaintiff's case and may even be tempted to destroy it, so it is critical for surviving family members to retain legal counsel as soon as possible.

Whether you are a contractor involved in a construction defect dispute with several different parties or you are a commercial property owner facing a landlord - tenant dispute, our firm has the experience and resources to obtain the best possible outcome in your case.

In any case, it is a good idea to serve these documents as soon as possible to avoid the party asking for and receiving an adjournment.

Comparing her predictions to the ultimate results, Shullman concluded that it was possible to predict the result in most cases by a simple measure — the party being asked the most questions generally lost.

In this case, the Court of Appeal found it was possible for more than one party to be the occupier of the property where the accident took place at the relevant time, the pleadings disclosed enough facts to permit the Application Judge's conclusion that the Hellers and not the Respondents were occupiers (at the relevant time).

In some cases, however, where a third party is at fault for the injury, an additional lawsuit against that third party may be possible in addition to the workers» compensation claiIn some cases, however, where a third party is at fault for the injury, an additional lawsuit against that third party may be possible in addition to the workers» compensation claiin addition to the workers» compensation claim.

When this approach is not possible or desirable in an enforcement case, we will act quickly to pursue an enforcement and / or contempt of court action against the noncompliant party.

Might it perhaps have been argued in the case of Austria, Finland and Sweden - and could it be argued similarly in the case of the UK - that it is not possible for one of the EEA Contracting Parties to «apply to become a party to this Agreement», since they are already a party.

Punitive damages are possible in a pedestrian accident case when the conduct of the party that caused the accident is deemed to be particularly reckless.

In an era of increasingly collaborative divorce, and particularly in cases where the parties have children, the goal of ensuring the most amicable possible future relationship between the parties is not best served by including inflammatory statements within the petitioIn an era of increasingly collaborative divorce, and particularly in cases where the parties have children, the goal of ensuring the most amicable possible future relationship between the parties is not best served by including inflammatory statements within the petitioin cases where the parties have children, the goal of ensuring the most amicable possible future relationship between the parties is not best served by including inflammatory statements within the petition.

While it is always important to give timely notice of a work injury, in equipment accident cases an employee should also seek legal counsel as soon as possible after the accident because they may also have a «third - party action» that might result in additional compensation.