Sentences with phrase «possible signal to noise»

This allows us to build imaging systems that detect specific application relevant information in the huge amount of accessible optical data with the best possible signal to noise ratio.

Not exact matches

«One of our biggest challenges was to make it possible to compare various measured data and climate archives from a wide variety of regions and filter out the natural noise that can greatly distort the signal of climate archives.»

Tuomi's team ran statistical analyses to tease out possible planetary signals from background noise.

With our technique, high contrast wide field imaging with high signal to noise ratio is now possible, which leads to high sensitivity wide field imaging.»

As reported recently in Nature, physicists at the Weizmann Institute of Science used a similar trick to measure the interaction between the smallest possible magnets — two single electrons — after neutralizing magnetic noise that was a million times stronger than the signal they needed to detect.

Modern electronic techniques make it relatively easy to distinguish true signals from noise; in addition, computers make possible the performance of significant experiments concerning the complex relationship between stimulus and action.

In addition, a photonic integrated circuit can remove background noise from an RF signal with unprecedented precision, which will increase the signal to noise performance and make possible new benchmarks in low power performance.

After we have calculated the S indices for the 5,648 main - sequence stars based on the LAMOST spectra with signal - to - noise ratios higher than 10 in the blue part of the spectrum, including the subset of 48 superflare stars, it is possible to calculate the flare rates.

But they still took great pains to rule out alternative explanations, scrutinizing a variety of detector data and the output of numerous on - site instruments that measure seismic activity, radio interference and many other possible sources of «noise» that could conceivably mimic a gravitational - wave signal, team members said.

Thus the time scale for reliability of BVP runs needs a sufficient time scale such that you have a good sampling of possible paths (i.e. the signal has to be distinguished from the weather «noise»).

How does the IPCC consensus justify allocating as much variability as possible to external forcings, and assuming the remainder is «noise» — given that this will obviously tend to underestimate the noise and overestimate the signal?

Ask them if it is statistically correct to assume as much of the variation as possible is attributable to external cause (signal), and ASSUME the residual is internal «noise».

Please enlighten me as to why I should be reasonably concerned with an anthropogenic signal, sea - level wise, which is at best 10 % of the most recent end extreme interglacial climate «noise», and which, at worst, is 2.8 % of the possible +21.3 m MSL which may have been achieved the last time we were at an eccentricity minimum.......

Anyway, our paper concluded by suggesting that, in view of the extreme significance of upper - level humidity to the climate change story, the international radiosonde data on upper - level humidity should not be «written off» without a serious attempt at abstracting the best possible humidity signal from within the noise of instrumental and operational changes at each of the relevant radiosonde stations.